Literature DB >> 28049358

Thrombophilia Screening: Universal, Selected, or Neither?

Giuseppe Colucci1,2, Dimitrios A Tsakiris2.   

Abstract

The utility of thrombophilia testing in clinical practice is still a matter of debate because studies have not shown a benefit in the reduction of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk in patients with thrombosis, despite the clearly higher VTE risk for first thrombosis. Screening for thrombophilia is indicated in selected patients. Particularly in selected young patients, especially women of childbearing age, the knowledge of the genetic thrombophilic defect may help in specific situations to decrease the risk of VTE events. Avoidance of modifiable risk factors and/or prophylactic thromboembolic procedures may be evaluated in selected patients. A comprehensive workup including personal and familial history, clinical examination, and laboratory test results including hereditary thrombophilia remains helpful in assessing the cumulative risk and the management of this group of selected patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  genetic thrombophilia; thrombophilia screening; venous thromboembolism

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28049358     DOI: 10.1177/1076029616683803

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost        ISSN: 1076-0296            Impact factor:   2.389


  6 in total

1.  Requirement for a Pathologist's Second Signature Limits Inappropriate Inpatient Thrombophilia Testing.

Authors:  Jesse L Cox; Sara M Shunkwiler; Scott A Koepsell
Journal:  Lab Med       Date:  2017-11-08

2.  Successful treatment in one myelodysplastic syndrome patient with primary thrombocytopenia and secondary deep vein thrombosis: A case report.

Authors:  Wen-Bin Liu; Jian-Xiong Ma; Hong-Xuan Tong
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 1.534

3.  Appropriateness of thrombophilia testing in patients in the acute care setting and an evaluation of the associated costs.

Authors:  Riddhi Virparia; Luigi Brunetti; Stuart Vigdor; Christopher D Adams
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Patients with SERPINC1 rs2227589 polymorphism found to have multiple cerebral venous sinus thromboses despite a normal antithrombin level: A case report.

Authors:  Feng Liao; Jun-Ling Zeng; Jian-Gang Pan; Jing Ma; Zhi-Jian Zhang; Zhi-Jun Lin; Li-Feng Lin; Yu-Sen Chen; Xiao-Tang Ma
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 1.337

5.  Prevalence of thrombophilia-associated genetic risk factors in blood donors of a regional hospital in southern Brazil.

Authors:  Jéssica Dick-Guareschi; Juliana Cristine Fontana; Maria Teresa Vieira Sanseverino; Francyne Kubaski; Leo Sekine; Nanci Félix Mesquita; Tor Gunnar Hugo Onsten; Sandra Leistner-Segal
Journal:  Hematol Transfus Cell Ther       Date:  2021-03-16

Review 6.  Thrombophilia screening revisited: an issue of personalized medicine.

Authors:  Giuseppe Colucci; Dimitrios A Tsakiris
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.300

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.