Literature DB >> 28045298

Rats show adaptive choice in a metacognitive task with high uncertainty.

Shoko Yuki1, Kazuo Okanoya1.   

Abstract

Metacognition refers to the use of one's cognitive processes to coordinate behavior. Many higher cognitive functions such as feeling-of-knowing judgment and theory of mind are thought to be metacognitive processes. Although some primate species also show this ability in the form of behavioral control, a rodent model of metacognition is required for advanced studies of this phenomenon at behavioral, molecular, and neural levels. Here we show that rats could reliably be trained in a metacognitive task. The rats were trained to remember the location of a nose-poke hole and later indicate the location via a behavioral task. Rats had options of either demonstrating their memory or switching to an easier task (escape). Four rats were used in a two-choice metacognitive task, and 3 were used in a six-choice task. In the six-choice task, rats increased the likelihood of receiving a reward by utilizing the option to escape, in exchange for a decrease in the amount of reward received per correct trial. Furthermore, rats escaped more in sample-omitted trials than in standard trials. Results are consistent with the hypothesis that rats have metacognition, and could be utilized as a benchmark for further metacognition studies in rats. However, rats in the two-choice task did not use the escape response adaptively. These results were consistent with those seen in capuchin monkeys. Similarity between rodents and primates in task switching should expand the possibility of comparative studies of metacognition. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28045298     DOI: 10.1037/xan0000130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn        ISSN: 2329-8456            Impact factor:   2.478


  6 in total

1.  Slow Progress with the Most Widely Used Animal Model: Ten Years of Metacognition Research in Rats, 2009-2019.

Authors:  Victoria L Templer
Journal:  Anim Behav Cogn       Date:  2019-11

2.  Rats use memory confidence to guide decisions.

Authors:  Hannah R Joo; Hexin Liang; Jason E Chung; Charlotte Geaghan-Breiner; Jiang Lan Fan; Benjamin P Nachman; Adam Kepecs; Loren M Frank
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats.

Authors:  Keith A Lee; Aidan J Preston; Taylor B Wise; Victoria L Templer
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Subjective decision threshold for accurate visual detection performance in rats.

Authors:  Yuma Osako; Yoshio Sakurai; Junya Hirokawa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Molecular and neurocircuitry mechanisms of social avoidance.

Authors:  Anne-Kathrin Gellner; Jella Voelter; Ulrike Schmidt; Eva Carolina Beins; Valentin Stein; Alexandra Philipsen; René Hurlemann
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 9.261

6.  Chimpanzees show some evidence of selectively acquiring information by using tools, making inferences, and evaluating possible outcomes.

Authors:  Bonnie M Perdue; Theodore A Evans; Michael J Beran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.