Literature DB >> 28044472

How clinical practice is changing the rules: the sunitinib 2/1 schedule in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Sergio Bracarda1, Sylvie Negrier2, Jochen Casper3, Camillo Porta4, Manuela Schmidinger5, James Larkin6, Marine Gross Goupil7, Bernard Escudier8.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Currently, sunitinib is a standard of care in first-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, with the standard 4/2 schedule (sunitinib 50 mg/day; 4 consecutive weeks on treatment; 2 weeks' rest), 50% of patients require dose reductions to mitigate toxicity, highlighting the need to investigate alternative dosing schedules that improve tolerability without compromising efficacy. Areas covered: We present a concise critical review of published studies comparing the efficacy and safety of the 4/2 and 2/1 schedule (2 weeks on treatment; 1 week rest) for sunitinib. While all studies evaluating the 2/1 schedule have a low level of evidence, the results indicate that the 2/1 schedule improves tolerability compared with the 4/2 schedule, including significant reductions in the incidence of specific adverse events. It was not possible to make any definitive conclusions regarding efficacy due to methodologic limitations of these studies. Expert commentary: In the absence of strong evidence supporting the safety and efficacy of the 2/1 schedule, we recommend that patients should be initiated on sunitinib therapy with the standard 4/2 schedule and only be switched to the 2/1 schedule after the development of dose-limiting toxicities from weeks 3-4 (cycle 1) of the 4/2 schedule cycle.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Angiogenesis inhibitors; dose schedule; renal cell carcinoma; standard of care; sunitinib

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28044472     DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2017.1276830

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther        ISSN: 1473-7140            Impact factor:   4.512


  5 in total

Review 1.  Sunitinib in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma: an update on recent evidence.

Authors:  Mimma Rizzo; Camillo Porta
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2017-06-29

2.  Significance of introduction of alternative dosing schedule for sunitinib during first-line treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Hideaki Miyake; Yuto Matsushita; Hiromitsu Watanabe; Keita Tamura; Takahisa Suzuki; Daisuke Motoyama; Toshiki Ito; Takayuki Sugiyama; Atsushi Otsukav
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  'The same old story': thoughts on authorized doses of anticancer drugs.

Authors:  Fausto Meriggi; Alberto Zaniboni
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 8.168

4.  PRISM protocol: a randomised phase II trial of nivolumab in combination with alternatively scheduled ipilimumab in first-line treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Hannah L Buckley; Fiona J Collinson; Gemma Ainsworth; Heather Poad; Louise Flanagan; Eszter Katona; Helen C Howard; Geraldine Murden; Rosamonde E Banks; Joanne Brown; Galina Velikova; Tom Waddell; Kate Fife; Paul D Nathan; James Larkin; Thomas Powles; Sarah R Brown; Naveen S Vasudev
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  A 2/1 Sunitinib Dosing Schedule Provides Superior Antitumor Effectiveness and Less Toxicity Than a 4/2 Schedule for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Huan Deng; Meng Li; Qian Wu; Li Wang; Zhengdong Hong; Fengming Yi; Yiping Wei; Wenxiong Zhang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 6.244

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.