| Literature DB >> 28044472 |
Sergio Bracarda1, Sylvie Negrier2, Jochen Casper3, Camillo Porta4, Manuela Schmidinger5, James Larkin6, Marine Gross Goupil7, Bernard Escudier8.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Currently, sunitinib is a standard of care in first-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, with the standard 4/2 schedule (sunitinib 50 mg/day; 4 consecutive weeks on treatment; 2 weeks' rest), 50% of patients require dose reductions to mitigate toxicity, highlighting the need to investigate alternative dosing schedules that improve tolerability without compromising efficacy. Areas covered: We present a concise critical review of published studies comparing the efficacy and safety of the 4/2 and 2/1 schedule (2 weeks on treatment; 1 week rest) for sunitinib. While all studies evaluating the 2/1 schedule have a low level of evidence, the results indicate that the 2/1 schedule improves tolerability compared with the 4/2 schedule, including significant reductions in the incidence of specific adverse events. It was not possible to make any definitive conclusions regarding efficacy due to methodologic limitations of these studies. Expert commentary: In the absence of strong evidence supporting the safety and efficacy of the 2/1 schedule, we recommend that patients should be initiated on sunitinib therapy with the standard 4/2 schedule and only be switched to the 2/1 schedule after the development of dose-limiting toxicities from weeks 3-4 (cycle 1) of the 4/2 schedule cycle.Entities:
Keywords: Angiogenesis inhibitors; dose schedule; renal cell carcinoma; standard of care; sunitinib
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28044472 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2017.1276830
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Expert Rev Anticancer Ther ISSN: 1473-7140 Impact factor: 4.512