Literature DB >> 28044238

Vaporize, anatomically vaporize or enucleate the prostate? The flexible use of the GreenLight laser.

Luca Cindolo1,2, Lorenzo Ruggera3, Paolo Destefanis4, Claudio Dadone5, Giovanni Ferrari6.   

Abstract

PURPOSES: GreenLight laser has gained increasing acceptance as a less invasive treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH/LUTS). Three surgical options were developed: standard photovaporization (PVP), anatomical PVP and GreenLight enucleation of prostate (GreenLEP); however, literature lacks a direct comparison among the procedures. Aim of the present study is to compare the three techniques in a multicentre series of patients.
METHODS: Data were collected from consecutive patients with indication to surgical management of BPH/LUTS in five institutions. Patients underwent standard PVP, anatomical PVP or GreenLEP according to surgeon preferences. Standard parameters associated with transurethral prostate surgery were documented prior surgery and during the follow-up. Patients' perception of improvement was measured using a single-item scale. Early (within first 30 post-operative days) and delayed post-operative complications were recorded. Descriptive statistics, univariate and multivariate analysis were used.
RESULTS: We evaluate 367 consecutive patients (mean age 69.1 years). Median prostate size and PSA were 68 ml (IQR 50-90) and 2.8 ng/ml (IQR 1.7-4.3), respectively. The median operative time and applied energy were 60 min (IQR 45-75) and 250 kJ (IQR 160-364). Catheterization time and median post-operative stay were 1 and 2 days. No patient was transfused. The overall median Q max values increased for 8-19 ml/s (p < 0.05), median International Prostate Symptoms Score decreased from 24 to 7 (p < 0.05). A total of 7.4% urinary retention, 33.4% bothersome storage symptoms, 2.5% short-term stress incontinence were recorded. Three heart attacks, one pulmonary embolism and one death occurred. Prostate volume was a predictive factor for post-operative storage symptoms (p = 0.049). Nine percentage of patients experienced long-term complications (4, 0.9 and 0.9% of urethral stricture, bladder neck contracture and prostatic fossa sclerosis, respectively) with 2.5% of long-term stress urinary incontinence (conservatively managed). The reintervention rate was 6%. Late complications were associated at univariate analysis with pharmacological therapy (combination therapy vs. alpha blockers alone vs. none: p value = 0.042) and with the surgical approach (standard PVP vs. anatomical PVP vs. GreenLEP p value = 0.011). The patients' perception of satisfaction was 68% "greatly improved", 27% "improved", 4% "not changed" and 1% "worsened" with no differences between techniques.
CONCLUSION: The availability of three different GreenLight laser techniques allows surgeons with different skills to safety use this technology that remains effective with high patient satisfaction. Anatomical vaporization seems to guarantee the best balance between functional outcomes, surgical procedures and complications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BPH; GreenLight laser 180 watt; LUTS; Patient satisfaction; Prostate photovaporization

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28044238     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-016-1494-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  17 in total

Review 1.  GreenLight laser vaporization of the prostate: has it come of age?

Authors:  Fernando Gomez-Sancha
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 2.  Safety, efficacy and reliability of 180-W GreenLight laser technology for prostate vaporization: review of the literature.

Authors:  Pietro Castellan; Roberto Castellucci; Luigi Schips; Luca Cindolo
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  GreenLight™ laser (XPS) photoselective vapo-enucleation versus holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Ahmed M Elshal; Mohamed A Elkoushy; Ahmed R El-Nahas; Ahmed M Shoma; Adel Nabeeh; Serge Carrier; Mostafa M Elhilali
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Efficacy of transurethral prostate enucleation by bipolar system for patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Katsuhiko Sato; Daisuke Obinata; Daigo Funakoshi; Fuminori Saito; Shogo Takada; Akiko Ito; Yasutaka Murata; Daisaku Ashikari; Yuichiro Ikado; Tomohiro Igarashi; Tsuyoshi Matsui; Junichi Mochida; Yataro Yamanaka; Kenya Yamaguchi; Satoru Takahashi
Journal:  Minerva Urol Nefrol       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 3.720

5.  Multicentre prospective evaluation of the learning curve of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP).

Authors:  Grégoire Robert; Jean-Nicolas Cornu; Marc Fourmarier; Christian Saussine; Aurélien Descazeaud; Abdel-Rahmène Azzouzi; Eric Vicaut; Bertrand Lukacs
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  GreenLight XPS 180W vs HPS 120W laser therapy for benign prostate hyperplasia: a prospective comparative analysis after 200 cases in a single-center study.

Authors:  Tal Ben-Zvi; Pierre-Alain Hueber; Daniel Liberman; Roger Valdivieso; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Drug adherence and clinical outcomes for patients under pharmacological therapy for lower urinary tract symptoms related to benign prostatic hyperplasia: population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Luca Cindolo; Luisella Pirozzi; Caterina Fanizza; Marilena Romero; Andrea Tubaro; Riccardo Autorino; Cosimo De Nunzio; Luigi Schips
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 8.  Meta-analysis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic enlargement.

Authors:  Sascha A Ahyai; Peter Gilling; Steven A Kaplan; Rainer M Kuntz; Stephan Madersbacher; Francesco Montorsi; Mark J Speakman; Christian G Stief
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Comparison of Photoselective Vaporization versus Holmium Laser Enucleation for Treatment of Benign Prostate Hyperplasia in a Small Prostate Volume.

Authors:  Kang Sup Kim; Jin Bong Choi; Woong Jin Bae; Su Jin Kim; Hyuk Jin Cho; Sung-Hoo Hong; Ji Youl Lee; Sang Hoon Kim; Hyun Woo Kim; Su Yeon Cho; Sae Woong Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Comparison of Predictive Factors for Postoperative Incontinence of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate by the Surgeons' Experience During Learning Curve.

Authors:  Katsumi Shigemura; Kazushi Tanaka; Fukashi Yamamichi; Koji Chiba; Masato Fujisawa
Journal:  Int Neurourol J       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 2.835

View more
  6 in total

1.  A novel vaporization-enucleation technique for benign prostate hyperplasia using 120-W HPS GreenLight™ laser: Seoul technique II in comparison with vaporization and previously reported modified vaporization-resection technique.

Authors:  Sangjun Yoo; Juhyun Park; Sung Yong Cho; Min Chul Cho; Hyeon Jeong; Hwancheol Son
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Standard vs. anatomical 180-W GreenLight laser photoselective vaporization of the prostate: a propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Luca Cindolo; Cosimo De Nunzio; Francesco Greco; Paolo Destefanis; Franco Bergamaschi; Giovanni Ferrari; Giuseppe Fasolis; Fabiano Palmieri; Claudio Divan; Rino Oriti; Lorenzo Ruggera; Andrea Tubaro; Claudio Dadone; Gaetano De Rienzo; Antonio Frattini; Vincenzo Mirone; Luigi Schips
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Reasons to believe in vaporization: a review of the benefits of photo-selective and transurethral vaporization.

Authors:  Russell N Schwartz; Felix Couture; Iman Sadri; Adel Arezki; David-Dan Nguyen; Ahmed S Zakaria; Kyle Law; Dean Elterman; Malte Rieken; Hannes Cash; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  En bloc greenlight laser enucleation of prostate (GreenLEP): about the first hundred cases.

Authors:  Frédéric Panthier; Jennifer Pasquier; Sébastien Bruel; Vidal Azancot; Alexandre De La Taille; Daniel Gasman
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Quality of life after photo-selective vaporization and holmium-laser enucleation of the prostate: 5-year outcomes.

Authors:  Inyoung Sun; Sangjun Yoo; Juhyun Park; Sung Yong Cho; Hyeon Jeong; Hwancheol Son; Seung-June Oh; Jae-Seung Paick; Min Chul Cho
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Endoscopic enucleation vs endoscopic vaporization procedures for benign prostatic hyperplasia: how should we choose: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xinbao Yin; Jun Chen; Hui Sun; Ming Liu; Zehua Wang; Benkang Shi; Xueping Zheng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 1.817

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.