Evren Ozcinar1, Mehmet Cakici1, Oktay Korun2, Unsal Han3, Ugursay Kiziltepe4. 1. 1 Ankara University, School of Medicine, Cardiovascular Surgery, Ankara, Turkey. 2. 2 Dr. Siyami Ersek Training and Research Hospital, Cardiovascular Surgery, Istanbul, Turkey. 3. 3 Diskapi Yildirim Beyazid Training and Research Hospital, Pathology, Ankara, Turkey. 4. 4 Diskapi Yildirim Beyazid Training and Research Hospital, Cardiovascular Surgery, Ankara, Turkey.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the heat induced damage at the saphenofemoral junction level according to histopathological changes after radiofrequency or 1,470 nm radial tip laser ablation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Varicose vein segments of 6-10 mm in diameter were exposed to radiofrequency (Closure Fast catheter, 7 cm heat segment, one cycle, 15 seconds, 10 Watt, 120 °C) or laser ablation (1,470 nm radial tip, continuous wave, vein diameter: 6 cm/8 cm/10 cm-power: 10 Watt-pullback speed: 2.2 mm/s, 1.7 mm/s, 1.3 mm/s-LEED: 45J/cm, 60J/cm, 75J/cm-EFE 25J/cm2, respectively). Approximate 2 cm segments of the vein were left untreated, then histopathological examinations of the untouched segments (5 slices: level 1 - furthest segment, level 2 - nearest segment) for heat induced damage were performed. A total damage scoring system was established, including the presence of endothelial swelling, intimal thickening, cellular vacuolisation in the muscle layer, oedema in the tunica media, and extent of necrosis. RESULTS: At level 1, the furthest segment of the specimen, there was no significant difference between the laser and control group, while the total damage score of the radiofrequency group was significantly higher than the control group (p < 0.01). Radiofrequency group had higher total damage score compared to the laser group at level 1 (p < 0.01), 2 (p < 0.01), and 5 (p < 0.01); while no significant difference was observed at level 3 (p = 0.46) and 4 (p = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: Significant heat induced damage may be seen even if the 2 cm segment of the vessel is left unablated. Radiofrequency ablation seems to cause more histological damage than laser ablation in this ex vivo study. Further in vivo studies are necessary, in order to validate these findings.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the heat induced damage at the saphenofemoral junction level according to histopathological changes after radiofrequency or 1,470 nm radial tip laser ablation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Varicose vein segments of 6-10 mm in diameter were exposed to radiofrequency (Closure Fast catheter, 7 cm heat segment, one cycle, 15 seconds, 10 Watt, 120 °C) or laser ablation (1,470 nm radial tip, continuous wave, vein diameter: 6 cm/8 cm/10 cm-power: 10 Watt-pullback speed: 2.2 mm/s, 1.7 mm/s, 1.3 mm/s-LEED: 45J/cm, 60J/cm, 75J/cm-EFE 25J/cm2, respectively). Approximate 2 cm segments of the vein were left untreated, then histopathological examinations of the untouched segments (5 slices: level 1 - furthest segment, level 2 - nearest segment) for heat induced damage were performed. A total damage scoring system was established, including the presence of endothelial swelling, intimal thickening, cellular vacuolisation in the muscle layer, oedema in the tunica media, and extent of necrosis. RESULTS: At level 1, the furthest segment of the specimen, there was no significant difference between the laser and control group, while the total damage score of the radiofrequency group was significantly higher than the control group (p < 0.01). Radiofrequency group had higher total damage score compared to the laser group at level 1 (p < 0.01), 2 (p < 0.01), and 5 (p < 0.01); while no significant difference was observed at level 3 (p = 0.46) and 4 (p = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: Significant heat induced damage may be seen even if the 2 cm segment of the vessel is left unablated. Radiofrequency ablation seems to cause more histological damage than laser ablation in this ex vivo study. Further in vivo studies are necessary, in order to validate these findings.