Literature DB >> 28042970

Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing in Molecular Subtyping of Lower-Grade Diffuse Gliomas: Application of the World Health Organization's 2016 Revised Criteria for Central Nervous System Tumors.

Jamal H Carter1, Samantha N McNulty1, Patrick J Cimino2, Catherine E Cottrell1, Jonathan W Heusel1, Katinka A Vigh-Conrad3, Eric J Duncavage4.   

Abstract

The 2007 World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System classifies lower-grade gliomas [LGGs (grades II to III diffuse gliomas)] morphologically as astrocytomas or oligodendrogliomas, and tumors with unclear ambiguous morphology as oligoastrocytomas. The World Health Organization's newly released (2016) classification incorporates molecular data. A single, targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel was used for detecting single-nucleotide variation and copy number variation in 50 LGG cases originally classified using the 2007 criteria, including 36 oligoastrocytomas, 11 oligodendrogliomas, 2 astrocytomas, and 1 LGG not otherwise specified. NGS results were compared with those from IHC analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization to assess concordance and to categorize the tumors according to the 2016 criteria. NGS results were concordant with those from IHC analysis in all cases. In 3 cases, NGS was superior to fluorescence in situ hybridization in distinguishing segmental chromosomal losses from whole-arm deletions. The NGS approach was effective in reclassifying 36 oligoastrocytomas as 30 astrocytomas (20 IDH1/2 mutant and 10 IDH1/2 wild type) and 6 oligodendrogliomas, and 1 oligodendroglioma as an astrocytoma (IDH1/2 mutant). Here we show that a single, targeted NGS assay can serve as the sole testing modality for categorizing LGG according to the World Health Organization's 2016 diagnostic scheme. This modality affords greater accuracy and efficiency while reducing specimen tissue requirements compared with multimodal approaches.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Investigative Pathology and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28042970     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2016.10.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.568


  16 in total

1.  Discriminating a common somatic ASXL1 mutation (c.1934dup; p.G646Wfs*12) from artifact in myeloid malignancies using NGS.

Authors:  Michael O Alberti; Sridhar Nonavinkere Srivatsan; Jin Shao; Samantha N McNulty; Gue Su Chang; Christopher A Miller; Jennifer B Dunlap; Fei Yang; Richard D Press; Qingsong Gao; Li Ding; Jonathan W Heusel; Eric J Duncavage; Matthew J Walter
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 11.528

2.  Targeted next-generation sequencing panel (TruSight Tumor 170) in diffuse glioma: a single institutional experience of 135 cases.

Authors:  Kiyong Na; Hyun-Soo Kim; Hyo Sup Shim; Jong Hee Chang; Seok-Gu Kang; Se Hoon Kim
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Scarring in Patients With PIK3CA-Related Overgrowth Syndromes.

Authors:  Jack E Steiner; Catherine E Cottrell; Jenna L Streicher; John N Jensen; David M King; Patricia E Burrows; Dawn H Siegel; Megha M Tollefson; Beth A Drolet; Katherine B Püttgen
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 10.282

4.  Updates in prognostic markers for gliomas.

Authors:  Elisa Aquilanti; Julie Miller; Sandro Santagata; Daniel P Cahill; Priscilla K Brastianos
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 5.  Diagnostic test accuracy and cost-effectiveness of tests for codeletion of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q in people with glioma.

Authors:  Alexandra McAleenan; Hayley E Jones; Ashleigh Kernohan; Tomos Robinson; Lena Schmidt; Sarah Dawson; Claire Kelly; Emmelyn Spencer Leal; Claire L Faulkner; Abigail Palmer; Christopher Wragg; Sarah Jefferies; Sebastian Brandner; Luke Vale; Julian Pt Higgins; Kathreena M Kurian
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-03-02

6.  Molecular Biomarker Testing for the Diagnosis of Diffuse Gliomas.

Authors:  Daniel J Brat; Kenneth Aldape; Julia A Bridge; Peter Canoll; Howard Colman; Meera R Hameed; Brent T Harris; Eyas M Hattab; Jason T Huse; Robert B Jenkins; Dolores H Lopez-Terrada; William C McDonald; Fausto J Rodriguez; Lesley H Souter; Carol Colasacco; Nicole E Thomas; Michelle Hawks Yount; Martin J van den Bent; Arie Perry
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 5.686

7.  Diagnostic Utility of Oncomine Comprehensive Assay v3 in Differentiating Between Isocitrate Dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutated Grade II-III Astrocytoma and Oligodendroglioma.

Authors:  So-Woon Kim; Bong Jin Park; Hyun-Soo Kim; Kiyong Na
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

8.  Mass spectrometry-based assay for the molecular diagnosis of glioma: concomitant detection of chromosome 1p/19q codeletion, and IDH1, IDH2, and TERT mutation status.

Authors:  Chiara Pesenti; Leda Paganini; Laura Fontana; Emanuela Veniani; Letterio Runza; Stefano Ferrero; Silvano Bosari; Maura Menghi; Giovanni Marfia; Manuela Caroli; Rosamaria Silipigni; Silvana Guerneri; Silvia Tabano; Monica Miozzo
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-08

Review 9.  Recent Advancement of the Molecular Diagnosis in Pediatric Brain Tumor.

Authors:  Jeong-Mo Bae; Jae-Kyung Won; Sung-Hye Park
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2018-05-01

10.  Precision Medicine in Relapsed and Refractory Childhood Cancers: Single-center Experience, Literature Review, and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Oz Mordechai; Myriam Weyl-Ben-Arush
Journal:  Rambam Maimonides Med J       Date:  2018-07-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.