| Literature DB >> 28042578 |
Michihiro Nakayama1, Atsutaka Okizaki1, Koji Takahashi1.
Abstract
Objective. The aim of this study was to investigate effects of aromatherapy in decreasing salivary gland damage for patients undergoing radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). Materials and Methods. The subjects were 71 patients with DTC. They were divided into aromatherapy group (group A, n = 35) and a control group (group B, n = 36). We blended 1.0 mL of lemon and 0.5 mL of ginger essential oils. The patients in the inhalation aromatherapy group inhaled this blend oil and those in the control group inhaled distilled water as placebo for 10 min during admission. We statistically compared salivary gland function before and after treatment between groups A and B. Results. In comparison with group B, the rate of change of the accumulation rate was significantly higher in the parotid glands and submandibular glands of group A (P < 0.05). In comparison with group B, a significant increase in rate of secretion change before and after treatment was noted in the bilateral parotid glands in group A (P < 0.05). Conclusion. Because an amelioration of salivary gland function was observed in the present study, our results suggest the efficacy of aromatherapy in the prevention of treatment-related salivary gland disorder. This trial is registered with UMIN Clinical Trial Registry: UMIN000013968.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28042578 PMCID: PMC5155074 DOI: 10.1155/2016/9509810
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Regions of interest on the summation image as obtained by dynamic scintigraphy.
Figure 2Measurement of salivary gland functions by salivary gland scintigraphy.
Patient characteristics.
| Characteristics | Group A ( | Group B ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age at diagnosis (y), mean (range) | 61.6 (35–78) | 59.8 (30–86) | 0.61 |
| Gender (female/male) | 25/10 | 30/6 | 0.27 |
| TNM stage | |||
| I | 2 | 2 | 0.94 |
| II | 0 | 0 | |
| III | 2 | 3 | |
| IV A/B/C | 14/0/17 | 12/1/18 | |
| I-131 dose (GBq), average ± standard deviation | 5.37 ± 0.20 | 5.24 ± 0.66 | 0.59 |
Comparisons of salivary gland scintigraphic parameters by using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.
| Group A | Group B |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rate of change of maximum accumulation ratio [%] | |||
| Rt. parotid gland | 29.31 ± 10.65 | 4.66 ± 5.50 | <0.05 |
| Lt. parotid gland | 47.08 ± 14.34 | 4.19 ± 5.98 | <0.05 |
| Rt. submandibular gland | 19.56 ± 6.23 | 1.96 ± 3.24 | <0.05 |
| Lt. submandibular gland | 13.91 ± 4.77 | 0.16 ± 3.86 | <0.05 |
| Rate of change of washout ratio [%] | |||
| Rt. parotid gland | 82.75 ± 38.56 | 18.58 ± 19.66 | <0.05 |
| Lt. parotid gland | 185.73 ± 75.78 | 3.39 ± 11.87 | <0.05 |
| Rt. submandibular gland | 60.73 ± 29.11 | 47.06 ± 17.96 | 0.45 |
| Lt. submandibular gland | 94.96 ± 33.13 | 18.58 ± 19.66 | 0.10 |
Figure 3Comparison of rate of change of maximum accumulation ratio in parotid glands.
Figure 4Comparison of rate of change of maximum accumulation ratio in submandibular glands.
Figure 5Comparison of rate of change of washout ratio in parotid glands.
Figure 6Comparison of rate of change of washout ratio in submandibular glands.