| Literature DB >> 28042572 |
Kexin Wang1, Alejandro Fernandez-Escobar2, Shuhong Han3, Ping Zhu4, Jun-Hui Wang5, Yu Sun6.
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) has been described in the literature, to be associated with impairment of executive function which develops early in the course of disease, and an effective treatment for this clinical feature remains elusive. Preclinical studies have implied that lamotrigine, an antiepileptic agent, could be a potential treatment for executive dysfunction in AD patients. Although there have been promising results in previous studies with lamotrigine, executive function has never been measured using animal models. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of lamotrigine on executive function and determine whether lamotrigine can attenuate inflammatory response in an AD mouse model. Nontransgenic and transgenic mice were treated with lamotrigine (0 or 30 mg/kg/day) in a standard laboratory chow diet starting at 3 months of age. After 6 months of continuous lamotrigine administration, there was a marked improvement in executive function and a significant attenuation in the expression of proinflammatory cytokines. These results suggest that lamotrigine could ameliorate executive dysfunction and brain inflammatory response in the mouse model of AD and early lamotrigine intervention may be a promising therapeutic strategy for AD.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28042572 PMCID: PMC5155079 DOI: 10.1155/2016/7810196
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1APP/PS1 mice (9 months old) showed plaque deposition, astrocyte activation, and higher level of IL-6 and IL-1β production in the brains. (a) Representative photograph of plaque deposition (Congo Red) in 9-month-old APP/PS1 mice (left); representative photograph of costaining of GFAP and Congo Red in 9-month-old APP/PS1 mice (right). Scale bar represents 500 μm. (b) Western blot analysis showed an increase of GFAP expression in APP/PS1 mouse brain cortex ( p < 0.001). n = 4. (c) Western blot analysis showed an increase of IL-1β in APP/PS1 mouse brain cortex ( p < 0.05). n = 4. (d) IL-6 was measured with ELISA kit in the brain tissue of cortical area of WT and APP/PS1 mice ( p < 0.05). n = 5. (e) IL-1 β was measured with ELISA kit in the brain tissue of cortical area of WT and APP/PS1 mice ( p < 0.05). n = 5. All data are expressed as means ± SEM.
Figure 2Lamotrigine decreased IL-6 and IL-1β production and inhibited GAFP expression in brain cortex of APP/PS1 mice. (a) IL-6 was measured with ELISA kit in the brain tissue of cortical area of WT and APP/PS1 mice with or without lamotrigine treatment ( p < 0.05). n = 5. (b) IL-1β was measured with ELISA kit in the brain tissue of cortical area of WT and APP/PS1 mice with or without lamotrigine treatment ( p < 0.05). n = 5. (c) GFAP expression in APP/PS1 mouse brain cortex was measured with western blot analysis in the brain tissue of cortical area of APP/PS1 mice with or without lamotrigine treatment ( p < 0.05). n = 4. All data are expressed as means ± SEM.
Figure 3Lamotrigine inhibits IL-1β production of cultured astrocytes from APP/PS1 mice. (a) Representative photograph of 4-week-old cultures astrocytes labeled with the specific marker protein of GFAP and Hochest 33258 for nucleus staining. (b) IL-1β was measured with ELISA kit in the cultured astrocytes treated with lamotrigine for 24 hours at different doses ( p < 0.05). n = 14–17. (c) IL-1β expression level was measured with western blot analysis in cultured astrocyte treated with 500 μM lamotrigine for 24 hours ( p < 0.05). n = 5. All data are expressed as means ± SEM.
Figure 4Lamotrigine attenuates executive function deficits of APP/PS1 mice in a puzzle box test. (a) Latencies of mice in each group to complete the task on day 1 (T1–T3). (b) Latencies of mice in each group to complete the task on day 1 (T4–T6). (c) Latencies of mice in each group to complete the task on day 1 (T7–T9). (d) Latencies of mice in each group to solve a new problem during the 3-day test. (e) Latencies of mice in each group to solve a repeat new problem after 3-minute interval during the 3-day test (short-term memory). (f) Latencies of mice in each group to solve a repeat new problem after 24-hour interval during the 3-day test (long-term memory). All data are expressed as means ± SEM. p < 0.05 versus WT; # p < 0.05 versus APP/PS1, n = 8.