| Literature DB >> 28042106 |
Abstract
Tuta absoluta (Meyrick, 1917) is a key tomato pest in South America and, recently, in Europe and Africa. To develop efficient control methods for this pest, adequate rearing protocols are desirable. As an alternative to tomato leaves (natural diet), we evaluated four artificial diets. Biological traits including larval and pupal viability and development time, pupal weight and deformations were assessed. Additionally, the optimum container size and larval density were evaluated. The diet based on casein, wheat germ and cellulose allowed the best development of T. absoluta, showing higher viability and no negative effects on larval instars and pupal weight. The best container was a glass tube measuring Ø 1 × h 6 cm, topped with waterproof cotton, with a density of three larvae. To evaluate the suitability of this diet, T. absoluta was reared during eight generations and life-table parameters were estimated for the F1, F3, F6, and F8 generations. The total viability (egg-adult) increased over the generations, reaching 75% in the eighth generation. Based on life-table estimations no differences among generations were found. The net reproductive rate (Ro) was higher than 40, the intrinsic rate of increase (rm) ranged between 0.08 and 0.11, the finite rate of increase (λ) was 1.1, the mean generation time (T) have a maximum of 44 d and doubling time ranged from 5.89-8.32 generations. These results indicated that a diet based on casein, wheat germ and cellulose was suitable for T. absoluta rearing in laboratory conditions.Entities:
Keywords: Rearing technique; fitness; life table
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28042106 PMCID: PMC5270397 DOI: 10.1093/jisesa/iew105
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Insect Sci ISSN: 1536-2442 Impact factor: 1.857
Composition of artificial diets for rearing T. absoluta
| Component | D1 | D2 | D3 | D4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| White beans | 37.5 g | – | – | – |
| Wheat germ | 30.0 g | 27.0 g | 22.5 g | 22.5 g |
| Cellulose | – | – | 3.7 g | 3.7 g |
| Soy protein | 15.0 g | – | – | – |
| Saccharose | – | 45.0 g | 26.2 g | 26.2 g |
| Choline chloride | – | 0.9 g | 0.7 g | 0.7 g |
| Wesson salts | – | 9.0 g | 7.5 g | 7.5 g |
| Casein | 15.0 g | 27.0 g | 26.2 g | 26.2 g |
| Brewer’s yeast | 18.7 g | – | – | – |
| Ascorbic acid | 1.8 g | 3.6 g | 3.0 g | 3.0 g |
| Sorbic acid | 0.9 g | – | – | – |
| Methyl parahydroxybenzoate (Nipagin) | 1.5 g | 1.3 g | 1.5 g | 1.5 g |
| Tetracycline | 56.5 mg | 0.2 mg | 0.5 mg | 0.5 mg |
| Formaldehyde 37% | 1.8 ml | 0.4g | 1.0 ml | 1.0 ml |
| Vitamin solution | 4.5 ml | 9.0 ml | 7.5 ml | 7.5 ml |
| Agar | 11.5 g | 18.0 g | 9.0 g | 9.0 g |
| Water | 600.0 ml | 780.0 ml | 630.0 ml | 630.0 ml |
| Powdered tomato leaves (lyophilized) | 15 g | – | – | 4.0 g |
aMihsfeldt and Parra (1999), based on Greene et al. (1976).
bHensley and Hammond (1968).
cBerger (1963) modified.
dBerger (1963) modified + powdered tomato leaves.
eNiacinamide: 1.0 g; calcium pantothenate: 1.0 g; riboflavin: 0.50 g; thiamin: 0.5 g; pyridoxine: 0.25 g; folic acid: 0.10 g; biotin: 0.02 mg; vitamin B12 (1,000 mg/ml): 2.00 ml.
Effects of five different diets on T. absoluta viability within 7 d after feeding (mean % ±EP), developmental stage duration (mean days ± EP), and egg to adult viability (mean % ± EP).
| Parameter | Diet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | D2 | D3 | D4 | D5 | ||
| Viability with 7 d | 44.67 ± 4.72 d | 65.33 ± 54.36 b | 76.63 ± 2.85 a | 55.33 ± 5.18 c | – | |
| Duration (days) | Larva | 15.83 ± 4.25 ab | 17.64 ± 2.07 bc | 22.10 ± 1.24 d | 16.12 ± 3.87 b | 12.99 ± 1.72 a |
| Pupa | 8.34 ± 0.13 c | 8.65 ± 0,127 bc | 9.20 ± 0, 175 a | 8.22 ± 0.19 c | 9.02 ± 1.16 ab | |
| Viability | Egg | 87.00 ± 1.94 b | 86.33 ± 1.98 b | 94.10 ± 1.37 a | 90.00 ± 1.74 ab | 93.53 ± 1.44 a |
| Larva | 35.33 ± 3.91 d | 57.33 ± 4.05 c | 74.83 ± 2.55 b | 48.00 ± 4.09 cd | 91.39 ± 2.30 a | |
| Pupa | 84.90 ± 4.96 ab | 81.40 ± 4.22 b | 97.74 ± 1.86 a | 74.64 ± 5.19 b | 93.43 ± 2.12 a | |
| Total | 26.36 | 40.00 | 69.71 | 30.80 | 80.29 | |
aMihsfeldt and Parra (1999), based on Greene et al. (1976).
bHensley and Hammond (1968).
cBerger (1963) modified.
dBerger (1963) modified + powdered tomato leaves.
eTomato leaves.
fMeans followed by the same letter in the line do not differ significantly (GLM with quasi-binomial distribution, followed by post hoc Tukey test; P < 0.05).
gMeans followed by the same letter in the line do not differ significantly (GLM with quasi-Poisson distribution, followed by post hoc Tukey test; P < 0.05).
Sex ratio and weight of pupae of T. absoluta reared on five diets
| Diet | Sex ratio | Pupal weight (mg) | Deformations% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Females | Males | |||
| D1 | 0.55 | 2.50 ± 0.18 b | 2.32 ± 0.107 b | 3.76 |
| D2 | 0.44 | 2.51 ± 0.15 b | 2.20 ± 0.12 b | 4.00 |
| D3 | 0.40 | 3.53 ± 0.07 a | 3.34 ± 0.104 a | 3.33 |
| D4 | 0.53 | 3.58 ± 0.09 a | 3.44 ± 0.069 a | 4.33 |
| D5 | 0.50 | 3.64 ± 0.10 a | 3.48 ± 0.047 a | – |
aNo difference in sex ratio (Chi2 = 6.33, df = 4, P = 0.1753).
bMeans followed by the same letter in the column do not differ significantly (GLM with quasi-Poisson distribution, followed by post hoc Tukey test; P < 0.05).
cMihsfeldt and Parra (1999), based on Greene et al. (1976).
dHensley and Hammond (1968).
eBerger (1963) modified.
fBerger (1963) modified + powdered tomato leaves.
gTomato leaves.
Larval viability (%) of T. absoluta reared in three types of containers and water loss of the diet per container
| Container type | Larval viability (%) | Water loss (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Large glass tube (2.0 × 8.5 cm) | 43.33 ± 9.20 b | 15.75 |
| Small glass tube (1.0 × 6.0 cm) | 66.66 ± 8.75 a | 20.40 |
| Plastic cup (4.0 × 6.0 cm) | 23.33 ± 7.85 c | 13.23 |
aMeans followed by the same letter in the column do not differ significantly (GLM with quasi-binomial distribution, followed by post hoc Tukey test; P < 0.05).
Larval and pupal viability of T. absoluta reared at five densities per rearing container
| Number of larvae per container | (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| Larval viability | Pupal viability | |
| 1 | 68.75 ± 4.78 ab | 90.9 ± 10.16 a |
| 3 | 87.5 ± 5.70 a | 93.75 ± 5.84 a |
| 6 | 77.08 ± 7.76 ab | 78.12 ± 10.30 a |
| 9 | 76.39 ± 4.60 ab | 90.40 ± 4.83 a |
| 12 | 61.45 ± 1.35 b | 98.43 ± 1.46 a |
aMeans followed by the same letter in the column do not differ significantly (GLM with quasi-binomial distribution, followed by post hoc Tukey test; P < 0.05).
Viability with 7 d, duration and viability of T. absoluta on diet D3 (casein, wheat germ and cellulose) in the first, fourth, sixth, and eighth generations
| Parameter | Generation | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | F4 | F6 | F8 | ||
| Viability with 7 d | 77.77 ± 2.52 b | 87.66 ± 1.62 ab | 83.00 ± 2.22 ab | 93.33 ± 1.44 a | |
| Duration (days) | Egg | 3.70 ± 0.221 a | 3.00 ± 0.00 c | 3.40 ± 0.16 b | 3.30 ± 0. 15 b |
| Larva | 21.93 ± 1.53 a | 16.24 ± 1.39 c | 20.50 ± 1.73 b | 20.36 ± 2.04 b | |
| Pupa | 9.25 ± 1.15 b | 11.55 ± 1.31 a | 9.36 ± 1.10 b | 9.05 ± 1.67 b | |
| Viability (%) | Egg | 98.75 ± 0.05 a | 94.50 ± 0.11 b | 97.25 ± 0.80 ab | 93.00 ± 0.10 b |
| Larva | 76.00 ± 3.85 a | 83.00 ± 3.63 a | 79.33 ± 2.34 a | 88.33 ± 2.99 a | |
| Pupa | 91.28 ± 1.91 a | 89.75 ± 2.00 a | 93.59 ± 1.80 a | 89.64 ± 1.92 a | |
| Total | 68.87 ± 0.42 | 69.97 ± 0.91 | 71.18 ± 0.70 | 74.66 ± 0.94 | |
aMeans followed by the same letter in the line do not differ significantly (GLM with quasi-binomial distribution, followed by post hoc Tukey test; P < 0.05).
bMeans followed by the same letter in the line do not differ significantly (GLM with quasi-Poisson distribution, followed by post hoc Tukey test; P < 0.05).
Longevity and fecundity of T. absoluta reared for eight generations on a diet based on casein, wheat germ and cellulose
| Generation | Longevity (days) | Fecundity (egss per female) |
|---|---|---|
| F1 | 12.80 ± 1.11 b | 88.06 ± 13.89 b |
| F4 | 11.77 ± 0.79 b | 117.25 ± 10.73 a |
| F6 | 15.97 ± 0.78 a | 130.72 ± 12.32 a |
| F8 | 13.96 ± 0.63 b | 115.88 ± 8.33 a |
aMeans followed by the same letter in the column do not differ significantly (GLM with quasi-Poisson distribution, followed by post hoc Tukey test; P < 0.05).
Life-table parameters for T. absoluta reared for eight generations on diet D3, based on casein, wheat germ, and cellulose (I. C. 95%)
| Generation | Ro | Rm | λ | T | DT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F1 | 45.019 (21.06–82.97) | 0.117 (0.08–0.14) | 1.124 (1.09–1.15) | 32.405 30.26–34.92) | 5.89 (4.80–7.89) |
| F4 | 45.164 (25.24–6.37) | 0.099 (0.07–0.12) | 1.104 (1.08–1.12) | 38.395 (35.88–41.59) | 6.984 (5.78–8.79) |
| F6 | 45.170 (21.41–93.11) | 0.109 (0.08–0.15) | 1.116 1.08–1.16) | 34.689 (32.08–37.92) | 6.310 (4.56–8.59) |
| F8 | 40.930 (17.40–83.02) | 0.0833 (0.06–0.10) | 1.086 1.06–1.10) | 44.558 (42.43–46.96) | 8.320 (6.75–12.01) |
aNet reproductive rate.
bIntrinsic rate of increase.
cFinite growth rate.
dMean duration of one generation.
eDuration time. Parameters compared by bootstrap analysis (10,000 repetitions).