Literature DB >> 28041972

Breast cancer biomarkers before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: does repeat testing impact therapeutic management?

Zhaoying Xian1, Alexander K Quinones2, Gary Tozbikian3, Debra L Zynger4.   

Abstract

In patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), there is no consensus on retesting biomarkers within the excision specimen. Our aim was to investigate the clinical relevance of biomarker changes post-NAC at a large tertiary medical center. A retrospective search was performed to identify cases from 2012 to 2015 with needle biopsy-confirmed invasive breast carcinoma treated with NAC and subsequent excision containing residual invasive tumor. Biomarkers (estrogen receptor [ER], progesterone receptor [PR], and HER2/neu [HER2]) were performed on all pre-NAC biopsies. One hundred fifty-four NAC-treated cases were identified in which 83 (54%) had repeat testing of at least 1 biomarker on the surgical specimen. Twenty-five (30%) of 83 repeated cases demonstrated changes in pre-NAC biopsy versus post-NAC resection biomarker status. There was no impact of age or grade on biomarker status changes. Tumors that were triple negative at biopsy were more likely to remain triple negative. Clinically relevant changes were identified including the following: (1) ER negative to ER positive, 2 (3%) of 75; (2) PR negative to PR positive with ER negative both pre- and post-NAC, 2 (3%) of 73; and (3) HER2 negative to positive, 1 (1%) of 77. Four of 5 of the changes led to modifications of the adjuvant treatment regimen, including the addition of adjuvant tamoxifen, anastrazole, or trastuzumab. In summary, post-NAC biomarker repeat testing in patients with breast cancer impacts therapeutic management in a small subset of patients and therefore, repeat testing may be considered for patients that are hormone receptor and/or HER2 negative before NAC.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarker; Breast cancer; ER; HER2; Neoadjuvant; PR; Repeat testing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28041972     DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2016.12.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  11 in total

Review 1.  Applying the New Guidelines of HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Huina Zhang; Ioana Moisini; Rana M Ajabnoor; Bradley M Turner; David G Hicks
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  The increasing importance of histologic grading in tailoring adjuvant systemic therapy in 30,843 breast cancer patients.

Authors:  C van Dooijeweert; I O Baas; I A G Deckers; S Siesling; P J van Diest; E van der Wall
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Effect of neoadjuvant therapy on breast cancer biomarker profile.

Authors:  Laura Rey-Vargas; Juan Carlos Mejía-Henao; María Carolina Sanabria-Salas; Silvia J Serrano-Gomez
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-07-18       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 4.  Predictors of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Breast Cancer: A Review.

Authors:  Weilin Xu; Xiu Chen; Fei Deng; Jian Zhang; Wei Zhang; Jinhai Tang
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Negative Conversion of Progesterone Receptor Status after Primary Systemic Therapy Is Associated with Poor Clinical Outcome in Patients with Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Soomin Ahn; Hyun Jeong Kim; Milim Kim; Yul Ri Chung; Eunyoung Kang; Eun-Kyu Kim; Se Hyun Kim; Yu Jung Kim; Jee Hyun Kim; In Ah Kim; So Yeon Park
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 4.679

6.  Clonal replacement and heterogeneity in breast tumors treated with neoadjuvant HER2-targeted therapy.

Authors:  Jennifer L Caswell-Jin; Katherine McNamara; Johannes G Reiter; Ruping Sun; Zheng Hu; Zhicheng Ma; Jie Ding; Carlos J Suarez; Susanne Tilk; Akshara Raghavendra; Victoria Forte; Suet-Feung Chin; Helen Bardwell; Elena Provenzano; Carlos Caldas; Julie Lang; Robert West; Debu Tripathy; Michael F Press; Christina Curtis
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 7.  HER2 status in breast cancer: changes in guidelines and complicating factors for interpretation.

Authors:  Soomin Ahn; Ji Won Woo; Kyoungyul Lee; So Yeon Park
Journal:  J Pathol Transl Med       Date:  2019-11-06

8.  Characterizing advanced breast cancer heterogeneity and treatment resistance through serial biopsies and comprehensive analytics.

Authors:  Allen Li; Jamie M Keck; Swapnil Parmar; Janice Patterson; Marilyne Labrie; Allison L Creason; Brett E Johnson; Molly Downey; George Thomas; Carol Beadling; Laura M Heiser; Annette Kolodzie; Alexander R Guimaraes; Christopher L Corless; Joe W Gray; Gordon B Mills; Raymond C Bergan; Zahi I Mitri
Journal:  NPJ Precis Oncol       Date:  2021-03-26

9.  Biomarker dynamics and prognosis in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Cristina Zarotti; Bärbel Papassotiropoulos; Constanze Elfgen; Konstantin Dedes; Denise Vorburger; Bernhard Pestalozzi; Andreas Trojan; Zsuzsanna Varga
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Biomarkers Changes after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: A Seven-Year Single Institution Experience.

Authors:  Saverio Coiro; Elisa Gasparini; Giuseppe Falco; Giacomo Santandrea; Moira Foroni; Giulia Besutti; Valentina Iotti; Roberto Di Cicilia; Monica Foroni; Simone Mele; Guglielmo Ferrari; Giancarlo Bisagni; Moira Ragazzi
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.