Pauline Renou1, Jean-Benoît Thambo2, Xavier Iriart3, Stéphanie Nicot4, Nathanael Kabore5, Zakaria Jalal3, Stéphane Olindo4, Sabrina Debruxelles4, Mathilde Poli4, François Rouanet4, Igor Sibon6. 1. Department of Neurology, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France. Electronic address: pauline.renou@chu-bordeaux.fr. 2. Inserm U-1045, LIRYC, Institut de Rythmologie et Modélisation Cardiaque, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France; Department of Congenital Cardiopathies, Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France. 3. Department of Congenital Cardiopathies, Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France. 4. Department of Neurology, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France. 5. Pôle de Santé Publique, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France. 6. Department of Neurology, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France; INCIA, UMR 5287, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) may be considered in patients with atrial fibrillation and contraindication for long-term anticoagulation. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of LAAC followed by single antiplatelet therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation and previous spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). METHODS: In this explorative, prospective, single-center study, consecutive patients who underwent LAAC because of previous spontaneous ICH over a period of 4 years were analyzed. Risks of ischemic strokes and hemorrhagic complications were estimated using the CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores, respectively. Single antiplatelet therapy was given for at least 6 months post implantation. Clinical follow-up included cardiological evaluations at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, and neurological evaluations at 3 and 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 46 patients underwent LAAC with a mean follow-up of 12 ± 7 months. The observed annual rate of ischemic stroke was 4.35% compared with an expected rate of 7.23% according to the mean risk of the population based on CHA2DS2-VASc score, which translated into a 40% risk reduction. The observed annual rate of major bleeding was 4.35% compared with an expected rate of 8.05% according to the mean risk of the population based on HAS-BLED score, which translated into a 46% risk reduction. CONCLUSIONS: LAAC followed by single antiplatelet therapy is feasible as an alternative to oral anticoagulation in high-risk patients with previous ICH, with an acceptable periprocedural risk. Longer follow-up in a larger number of patients will be needed to establish the effectiveness of LAAC relative to direct oral anticoagulants.
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) may be considered in patients with atrial fibrillation and contraindication for long-term anticoagulation. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of LAAC followed by single antiplatelet therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation and previous spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). METHODS: In this explorative, prospective, single-center study, consecutive patients who underwent LAAC because of previous spontaneous ICH over a period of 4 years were analyzed. Risks of ischemic strokes and hemorrhagic complications were estimated using the CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores, respectively. Single antiplatelet therapy was given for at least 6 months post implantation. Clinical follow-up included cardiological evaluations at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, and neurological evaluations at 3 and 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 46 patients underwent LAAC with a mean follow-up of 12 ± 7 months. The observed annual rate of ischemic stroke was 4.35% compared with an expected rate of 7.23% according to the mean risk of the population based on CHA2DS2-VASc score, which translated into a 40% risk reduction. The observed annual rate of major bleeding was 4.35% compared with an expected rate of 8.05% according to the mean risk of the population based on HAS-BLED score, which translated into a 46% risk reduction. CONCLUSIONS:LAAC followed by single antiplatelet therapy is feasible as an alternative to oral anticoagulation in high-risk patients with previous ICH, with an acceptable periprocedural risk. Longer follow-up in a larger number of patients will be needed to establish the effectiveness of LAAC relative to direct oral anticoagulants.
Authors: Mohammed Osman; Tatiana Busu; Khansa Osman; Safi U Khan; Matthew Daniels; David R Holmes; Mohamad Alkhouli Journal: JACC Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2020-01-29