| Literature DB >> 28041829 |
Alexander Volodarsky-Perel1, Talia Eldar-Geva2, Hananel E G Holzer1, Oshrat Schonberger1, Orna Reichman2, Michael Gal3.
Abstract
The optimal time to perform cryopreserved embryo transfer (CET) after a failed oocyte retrieval-embryo transfer (OR-ET) cycle is unknown. Similar clinical pregnancy rates were recently reported in immediate and delayed CET, performed after failed fresh OR-ET, in cycles with the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol. This study compared outcomes of CET performed adjacently (<50 days, n = 67) and non-adjacently (≥50 to 120 days, n = 62) to the last OR-day of cycles with the GnRH agonist down-regulation protocol. Additional inclusion criteria were patients' age 20-38 years, the transfer of only 1-2 cryopreserved embryos, one treatment cycle per patient and artificial preparation for CET. Significantly higher implantation, clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were found in the non-adjacent group than in the adjacent group: 30.5% versus 11.3% (P = 0.001), 41.9% versus 17.9% (P = 0.003) and 32.3% versus 13.4% (P = 0.01), respectively. These results support the postponement of CET after a failed OR-ET for at least one menstrual cycle, when a preceding long GnRH-agonist protocol is used. Copyright ÂEntities:
Keywords: Assisted reproduction; Cryopreserved embryo transfer; Embryo cryopreservation; Endometrial receptivity; GnRH agonist; Long protocol
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28041829 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.11.013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Biomed Online ISSN: 1472-6483 Impact factor: 3.828