Literature DB >> 28041728

Associations between housing and management practices and the prevalence of lameness, hock lesions, and thin cows on US dairy operations.

A E Adams1, J E Lombard2, C P Fossler3, I N Román-Muñiz4, C A Kopral3.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the association among different housing and management practices on the prevalence of lameness, hock lesions, and thin cows on US dairy operations. This study was conducted as part of the National Animal Health Monitoring System's Dairy 2014 study, which included dairy operations in 17 states. Size categories were assigned as follows: small (30-99 cows), medium (100-499 cows), and large (≥500 cows). Trained assessors visited 191 dairy operations from March through July 2014 and recorded locomotion and hock scores (on a 3-point scale), and the number of thin cows (body condition score ≤2.25) from a total of 22,622 cows (average 118 cows per farm). The majority of cows (90.4%) were considered to be sound (locomotion score = 1), 6.9% were mild/moderately lame (locomotion score = 2), and 2.7% were severely lame (locomotion score = 3). Similarly, most cows (87.3%) had no hock lesions (hock score = 1), 10.1% had mild lesions (hock score = 2), and 2.6% had severe hock lesions (hock score = 3). A low percentage of cows (4.2%) were thin. Univariate comparisons were performed using PROC LOGLINK, which accounts for study design and weighting. Variables meeting the univariate screening criterion of P < 0.20 were eligible for entry into multivariable models. Statistical significance in the multivariable models was declared at P < 0.05. Large operations had a lower within-herd prevalence of cows with locomotion score ≥2 and locomotion score = 3 compared with small or medium-sized operations. Operations on which cows were kept primarily on pasture had a lower percentage of locomotion score = 3 than those housed in freestall or open/dry lot operations. The use of sand bedding was associated with a lower within-herd prevalence of locomotion score ≥2 than straw/hay or dry/composted manure as the primary bedding material. Sand bedding was also associated with a lower within-herd prevalence of locomotion score = 3 than other bedding types except for rubber mats or mattresses. Operations that housed cows in an open/dry lot had a lower percentage of hock score ≥2 and hock score = 3 than other housing types. Providing sprinklers for heat abatement and having a nutritionist balance rations for cows was associated with a lower percentage of thin cows. Results from this study highlight management practices that may reduce the prevalence of lameness, hock lesions, and thin cows on dairy operations in the United States.
Copyright © 2017 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  body condition; dairy cow; hock lesions; lameness

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28041728     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2016-11517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  15 in total

1.  Prevalence of lameness and hoof lesions in all year-round grazing cattle in Brazil.

Authors:  Tiago Facury Moreira; Rafael Romero Nicolino; Leandro Silva de Andrade; Elias Jorge Facury Filho; Antônio Ultimo de Carvalho
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Effects of housing beef cow-calf pairs on drylot or pasture in the Midwest on production parameters and calf behavior through feedlot receiving.

Authors:  Megan E Myerscough; Lucas T Neira; Keifer H Sexton; Lucas S Hofer; Keela M Trennepohl; William T Meteer; Wesley P Chapple; Josh C McCann; Daniel W Shike
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  The farm cost of decreasing antimicrobial use in dairy production.

Authors:  Guillaume Lhermie; Loren William Tauer; Yrjo Tapio Gröhn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A systematic review and meta-analyses of risk factors associated with lameness in dairy cows.

Authors:  Andreas W Oehm; Gabriela Knubben-Schweizer; Anna Rieger; Alexander Stoll; Sonja Hartnack
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Univariate associations between housing, management, and facility design factors and the prevalence of lameness lesions in fourteen small-scale dairy farms in Northeastern Algeria.

Authors:  Zoubida Dendani-Chadi; Khelaf Saidani; Loubna Dib; Fayçal Zeroual; Faouzi Sammar; Ahmed Benakhla
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2020-03-27

Review 6.  Monitoring and Improving the Metabolic Health of Dairy Cows during the Transition Period.

Authors:  Luciano S Caixeta; Bobwealth O Omontese
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-31       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Identifying cow - level factors and farm characteristics associated with locomotion scores in dairy cows using cumulative link mixed models.

Authors:  Andreas W Oehm; Roswitha Merle; Annegret Tautenhahn; K Charlotte Jensen; Kerstin-Elisabeth Mueller; Melanie Feist; Yury Zablotski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Beef production from cull dairy cows: a review from culling to consumption.

Authors:  Ligia C Moreira; Guilherme J M Rosa; Daniel M Schaefer
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.338

Review 9.  Association between Lameness and Indicators of Dairy Cow Welfare Based on Locomotion Scoring, Body and Hock Condition, Leg Hygiene and Lying Behavior.

Authors:  Mohammed B Sadiq; Siti Z Ramanoon; Wan Mastura Shaik Mossadeq; Rozaihan Mansor; Sharifah Salmah Syed-Hussain
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-11-05       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 10.  Keeping Dairy Cows for Longer: A Critical Literature Review on Dairy Cow Longevity in High Milk-Producing Countries.

Authors:  Gabriel M Dallago; Kevin M Wade; Roger I Cue; J T McClure; René Lacroix; Doris Pellerin; Elsa Vasseur
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-13       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.