Literature DB >> 28041649

Development of a nomogram for predicting the risk of anastomotic leakage after a gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

R-H Tu1, J-X Lin1, C-H Zheng1, P Li1, J-W Xie1, J-B Wang1, J Lu1, Q-Y Chen1, L-L Cao1, M Lin1, C-M Huang2.   

Abstract

AIMS: To investigate the incidence of and factors associated with anastomotic leakage (AL) following gastrectomy for gastric cancer.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 3632 patients who underwent a laparoscopic gastrectomy or open gastrectomy for gastric cancer. A logistic regression model was used to identify the determinant variables, and a nomogram for AL was developed.
RESULTS: A total of 3632 patients were included in the study, 50 of whom (1.4%) developed AL. Postoperative deaths occurred in 6 (0.2%) patients with AL failure to rescue. Esophagojejunal AL (27/50) and Billroth I AL (20/50) were the most common types of AL. Gastrografin swallow was the main diagnostic method. The diagnosis was made a median of 9 days postoperatively. The median healing time for AL was 34.5 days. Of the 50 AL patients, 56% of patients could be managed nonsurgically, whereas 28% of patients required percutaneous radiologic drainage, 6% of patients were treated by endoscopy, and 10% of patients required a second surgery. A multivariate analysis showed the following adverse risk factors for AL: age ≥65 years, hemoglobin ≤8.0 g/dL and malnourishment. A multivariable model for AL showed a strong optimism-adjusted discrimination (concordance index, 0.675). The 5-year overall survival rates for patients without or with AL were 59.4% and 67.4%, respectively (p = 0.354).
CONCLUSIONS: AL was infrequent but was more prevalent in patients with age ≥65 years, hemoglobin ≤8.0 g/dL and malnourishment. We created a novel nomogram that can provide individualized prediction of AL in patients after a gastrectomy for gastric cancer, which may help clinicians in making treatment decisions.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anastomotic leakage; Gastrectomy; Nomogram; Risk factor; Stomach cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28041649     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.11.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  10 in total

1.  Lymph Node Noncompliance Affects the Long-Term Prognosis of Patients with Gastric Cancer after Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Guang-Tan Lin; Qi-Yue Chen; Chao-Hui Zheng; Ping Li; Jian-Wei Xie; Jia-Bin Wang; Jian-Xian Lin; Jun Lu; Long-Long Cao; Mi Lin; Ru-Hong Tu; Ze-Ning Huang; Ju-Li Lin; Chang-Ming Huang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage following gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Rie Makuuchi; Tomoyuki Irino; Yutaka Tanizawa; Etsuro Bando; Taiichi Kawamura; Masanori Terashima
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  The safety of esophagojejunostomy via a transorally inserted-anvil method vs extracorporeal anastomosis using a circular stapler during total gastrectomy for Siewert type 2 adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.

Authors:  Xin-Hua Chen; Yan-Feng Hu; Jun Luo; Yue-Hong Chen; Hao Liu; Tian Lin; Hao Chen; Guo-Xin Li; Jiang Yu
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2019-10-11

4.  Prognostic factors for short-term and long-term outcomes of gastric cancer surgery for elderly patients: 10 years of experience at a single tertiary care center.

Authors:  Stefano de Pascale; Daniele Belotti; Andrea Celotti; Eleonora Maddalena Minerva; Vittorio Quagliuolo; Riccardio Rosati; Uberto Fumagalli Romario
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2018-06-30

5.  Risk factors for esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage after curative total gastrectomy combined with D2 lymph node dissection for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Jiadi Xing; Maoxing Liu; Xinyu Qi; Jianhong Yu; Yingcong Fan; Kai Xu; Pin Gao; Fei Tan; Zhendan Yao; Nan Zhang; Hong Yang; Chenghai Zhang; Ming Cui; Xiangqian Su
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 6.  Prediction models for patients with esophageal or gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  H G van den Boorn; E G Engelhardt; J van Kleef; M A G Sprangers; M G H van Oijen; A Abu-Hanna; A H Zwinderman; V M H Coupé; H W M van Laarhoven
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A comparison between pylorus-preserving and distal gastrectomy in surgical safety and functional benefit with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xinyu Mao; Xinlei Xu; Hua Zhu; Chunpeng Ji; Xu Lu; Baolin Wang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 2.754

8.  Machine Learning-based Correlation Study between Perioperative Immunonutritional Index and Postoperative Anastomotic Leakage in Patients with Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Xuanyu Liu; Su Lei; Qi Wei; Yizhou Wang; Haibin Liang; Lei Chen
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 3.642

9.  Prognostic significance of postoperative pneumonia after curative resection for patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Ru-Hong Tu; Jian-Xian Lin; Ping Li; Jian-Wei Xie; Jia-Bin Wang; Jun Lu; Qi-Yue Chen; Long-Long Cao; Mi Lin; Chao-Hui Zheng; Chang-Ming Huang
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 4.452

10.  Development and validation of grade-based prediction models for postoperative morbidity in gastric cancer resection using a Japanese web-based nationwide registry.

Authors:  Yoshio Haga; Hiroaki Miyata; Akira Tsuburaya; Mitsukazu Gotoh; Kazuhiro Yoshida; Hiroyuki Konno; Yasuyuki Seto; Yoshiyuki Fujiwara; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2019-06-20
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.