Literature DB >> 28040844

Application of organic acids for plant protection against phytopathogens.

Igor G Morgunov1,2, Svetlana V Kamzolova3, Emilia G Dedyukhina3, Tatiana I Chistyakova3, Julia N Lunina3, Alexey A Mironov3, Nadezda N Stepanova3,4, Olga N Shemshura5, Mikhail B Vainshtein3,4.   

Abstract

The basic tendency in the field of plant protection concerns with reducing the use of pesticides and their replacement by environmentally acceptable biological preparations. The most promising approach to plant protection is application of microbial metabolites. In the last years, bactericidal, fungicidal, and nematodocidal activities were revealed for citric, succinic, α-ketoglutaric, palmitoleic, and other organic acids. It was shown that application of carboxylic acids resulted in acceleration of plant development and the yield increase. Of special interest is the use of arachidonic acid in very low concentrations as an inductor (elicitor) of protective functions in plants. The bottleneck in practical applications of these simple, nontoxic, and moderately priced preparations is the absence of industrial production of the mentioned organic acids of required quality since even small contaminations of synthetic preparations decrease their quality and make them dangerous for ecology and toxic for plants, animals, and human. This review gives a general conception on the use of organic acids for plant protection against the most dangerous pathogens and pests, as well as focuses on microbiological processes for production of these microbial metabolites of high quality from available, inexpensive, and renewable substrates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agrobiotechnologies; Antimicrobial activity; Biologically active organic acids; Induced immunity; Phytopathogens; Plant protection (defense)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28040844     DOI: 10.1007/s00253-016-8067-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 0175-7598            Impact factor:   4.813


  6 in total

1.  Almond processing residues as a source of organic acid biopesticides during biosolarization.

Authors:  Jesus D Fernandez-Bayo; Emily A Shea; Amy E Parr; Yigal Achmon; James J Stapleton; Jean S VanderGheynst; Amanda K Hodson; Christopher W Simmons
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 7.145

Review 2.  Processing Factors Affecting the Phytochemical and Nutritional Properties of Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Peel Waste: A Review.

Authors:  Tandokazi Pamela Magangana; Nokwanda Pearl Makunga; Olaniyi Amos Fawole; Umezuruike Linus Opara
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 4.411

3.  Comparative transcriptome analysis of two contrasting resistant and susceptible Aegilops tauschii accessions to wheat leaf rust (Puccinia triticina) using RNA-sequencing.

Authors:  Saeideh Dorostkar; Ali Dadkhodaie; Esmaeil Ebrahimie; Bahram Heidari; Mahmood Ahmadi-Kordshooli
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Protective plant immune responses are elicited by bacterial outer membrane vesicles.

Authors:  Hannah M McMillan; Sophia G Zebell; Jean B Ristaino; Xinnian Dong; Meta J Kuehn
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 9.423

5.  A Pyrimidin-Like Plant Activator Stimulates Plant Disease Resistance and Promotes the Synthesis of Primary Metabolites.

Authors:  Jian Li; Ting Long; Tie-Jun Sun; Yun Lu; Jian Yin; Yu-Bing Yang; Guang-Yi Dai; Xiao-Yuan Zhu; Nan Yao
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Metabolomics and Transcriptomics Analyses of Two Contrasting Cherry Rootstocks in Response to Drought Stress.

Authors:  Tian Wan; Ying Feng; Chenglin Liang; Liuyi Pan; Ling He; Yuliang Cai
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.