Bhuvanesh Dave1, Daniel D Gonzalez1, Zhi-Bin Liu1, Xiaoxian Li1, Helen Wong1, Sergio Granados1, Nadeer E Ezzedine1, Douglas H Sieglaff1, Joe E Ensor1, Kathy D Miller1, Milan Radovich1, Agda KarinaEtrovic1, Steven S Gross1, Olivier Elemento1, Gordon B Mills1, Michael Z Gilcrease1, Jenny C Chang1. 1. Affiliations of authors: Houston Methodist Cancer Center, Houston, TX (BD, DDG, ZBL, HW, SG, DHS, JEE, JCC); Division of Basic Science Research, Department of Systems Biology (NEE, AKE, GBM), and Division of Pathology/Lab Medicine, Department of Pathology (MZG), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Breast Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center and Cancer Institute of Fudan University, Shanghai, China (ZBL); Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (XL); Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Institute for Computational Biomedicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY (OE); Joan and Sanford I. Weill Medical School of Cornell University, New York, NY (SSG); Department of Medicine, Indiana University Medical School, Indianapolis, IN (KDM); Departments of Surgery and Medical and Molecular Genetics, IU Center for Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Indianapolis, IN (MR).
Abstract
Background: Metaplastic breast cancer is one of the most therapeutically challenging forms of breast cancer because of its highly heterogeneous and chemoresistant nature. We have previously demonstrated that ribosomal protein L39 (RPL39) and its gain-of-function mutation A14V have oncogenic activity in triple-negative breast cancer and this activity may be mediated through inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS). The function of RPL39 and A14V in other breast cancer subtypes is currently unknown. The objective of this study was to determine the role and mechanism of action of RPL39 in metaplastic breast cancer. Methods: Both competitive allele-specific and droplet digital polymerase chain reaction were used to determine the RPL39 A14V mutation rate in metaplastic breast cancer patient samples. The impact of RPL39 and iNOS expression on patient overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Co-immunoprecipitation and immunoblot analyses were used for mechanistic evaluation of RPL39. Results: The RPL39 A14V mutation rate was 97.5% (39/40 tumor samples). High RPL39 (hazard ratio = 0.71, 95% confidence interval = 0.55 to 0.91, P = 006) and iNOS expression (P = 003) were associated with reduced patient overall survival. iNOS inhibition with the pan-NOS inhibitor NG-methyl-L-arginine acetate decreased in vitro proliferation and migration, in vivo tumor growth in both BCM-4664 and BCM-3807 patient-derived xenograft models (P = 04 and P = 02, respectively), and in vitro and in vivo chemoresistance. Mechanistically, RPL39 mediated its cancer-promoting actions through iNOS signaling, which was driven by the RNA editing enzyme adenosine deaminase acting on RNA 1. Conclusion: NOS inhibitors and RNA editing modulators may offer novel treatment options for metaplastic breast cancer.
Background: Metaplastic breast cancer is one of the most therapeutically challenging forms of breast cancer because of its highly heterogeneous and chemoresistant nature. We have previously demonstrated that ribosomal protein L39 (RPL39) and its gain-of-function mutation A14V have oncogenic activity in triple-negative breast cancer and this activity may be mediated through inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS). The function of RPL39 and A14V in other breast cancer subtypes is currently unknown. The objective of this study was to determine the role and mechanism of action of RPL39 in metaplastic breast cancer. Methods: Both competitive allele-specific and droplet digital polymerase chain reaction were used to determine the RPL39A14V mutation rate in metaplastic breast cancerpatient samples. The impact of RPL39 and iNOS expression on patient overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Co-immunoprecipitation and immunoblot analyses were used for mechanistic evaluation of RPL39. Results: The RPL39A14V mutation rate was 97.5% (39/40 tumor samples). High RPL39 (hazard ratio = 0.71, 95% confidence interval = 0.55 to 0.91, P = 006) and iNOS expression (P = 003) were associated with reduced patient overall survival. iNOS inhibition with the pan-NOS inhibitor NG-methyl-L-arginine acetate decreased in vitro proliferation and migration, in vivo tumor growth in both BCM-4664 and BCM-3807 patient-derived xenograft models (P = 04 and P = 02, respectively), and in vitro and in vivo chemoresistance. Mechanistically, RPL39 mediated its cancer-promoting actions through iNOS signaling, which was driven by the RNA editing enzyme adenosine deaminase acting on RNA 1. Conclusion: NOS inhibitors and RNA editing modulators may offer novel treatment options for metaplastic breast cancer.
Metaplastic breast carcinoma is a rare form of breast cancer, accounting for 0.2% to 5% of
all breast cancers (1). However, it is one of the
most chemotherapy-refractory breast cancer subtypes and is associated with a higher rate of
recurrence and poorer overall survival (OS) (2).
Metaplastic breast cancers exhibit diversity in their carcinomatous and sarcomatous features,
heterologous elements, and histologic and stromal appearance (2–15). This diversity makes it a difficult disease to treat.Metaplastic breast cancers remain a therapeutic dilemma primarily due to our limited
understanding of its pathogenesis. Treatment guidelines for metaplastic breast cancer are yet
to be established, and currently treatment is similar to basal-like triple-negative breast
cancers (TNBCs) (16). Metaplastic breast cancers
express several markers associated with basal-like cancers (eg, epidermal growth factor
receptor and cytokeratin 5/6); however, unlike basal-like carcinomas, they are typically
chemoresistant (17–19).
Three-year survival rates are approximately 40% for node-positive patients compared with
approximately 70% for basal-like TNBCs (15).
Node-positive patients have poorer clinical outcome, with recurrence patterns tending to favor
pulmonary metastasis (2). Using integrated
genomics and proteomics approaches, metaplastic breast cancers were found to be closely
related to the claudin-low breast cancer subtype (20). Claudin-low breast cancer is characterized by the loss of cell-cell adhesion
genes (5). Compared with other breast cancer
subtypes, metaplastic breast cancers and claudin-low breast cancers are enriched for stem
cell–like and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) characteristics (20,21), which partially contribute to their chemoresistance. A better understanding of
the molecular mechanisms underlying metaplastic breast cancer pathogenesis is essential to the
discovery of novel therapeutic targets for treatment.We recently identified a novel cancer gene, ribosomal protein L39
(RPL39), responsible for stem cell self-renewal, treatment resistance, and
lung metastasis in TNBC (22). Mechanistically,
RPL39 increased inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS)-mediated nitric oxide (NO) production
(22). Furthermore, the RPL39A14V mutation was found to be a predictor of early distant metastatic relapse to the lung and
worse OS. Although RPL39 plays a critical role in TNBC, the function of this protein in other
breast cancer subtypes is currently unknown. As metaplastic breast cancers display stem-like
and EMT features, we investigated the role and mechanism of action of RPL39 in this breast
cancer subtype using patient samples and in vitro and in vivo models.
Methods
Mutation Analysis
Previously identified RPL39 gene mutations were analyzed in tissues
samples from 40 patients with pathologically confirmed metaplastic breast cancer. Genomic
DNA isolated from patient tissue samples was analyzed for the presence of wild-type or
mutant allele using a custom-designed competitive allele-specific TaqMan (CAST) polymerase
chain reaction (PCR) assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) according to the
manufacturer’s instructions. The results of the CAST PCR analysis were confirmed by
droplet digital PCR (ddPCR). ddPCR was performed using a standard protocol with custom
RPL39 (A14V) ddPCR probes and primers (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) as detailed in
the Supplementary Methods
(available online). For all experiments, positive, negative, and no template controls were
used in the pre-amplification and ddPCR steps. Wild-type RPL39 plasmid
DNA was used as negative control to determine the cutoff for RPL39A14V
mutation.
Bioinformatics Analysis
The Kaplan-Meier plotter is capable of assessing the effect of 54 675 genes on survival
using 10 188 cancer samples. These include 4142 breast, 1648 ovarian, 2437 lung, and 1065
gastric cancerpatients with a mean follow-up of 69, 40, 49, and 33 months, respectively
(24). Written informed consent was
obtained from all study patients. The primary purpose of the tool is a meta-analysis-based
biomarker assessment, and we used this for determining the impact of RPL39 on TNBC patient
survival. Additionally, we used the Susan G. Komen foundation sequence database for normal
breast tissue from the Susan G. Komen for the Cure Tissue Bank at Indiana University. The
BAM files of twenty normal breast tissue samples were analyzed using Rsamtools pileup
(25) within R (R Development Core Team)
using the PileupParam of min base quality = 20 (Supplementary Table 1, available online) (26).
Immunoblot Analysis
Immunoblot analyses are detailed in the Supplementary Methods (available online).
Animal Studies
All animal studies were performed in accordance with our institutional animal use
committee guidelines and are detailed in the Supplementary Methods (available online).
Statistical Analysis
Patient and tumor characteristics were summarized using descriptive statistics.Association of patientOS with RPL39A14V mutation status and iNOS
expression level was determined using log-rank tests. OS was estimated using the
Kaplan-Meier method, and differences were compared using the log-rank test. Fisher’s exact
test was used for bivariate analysis of categorical factors. Pairwise differences in
fractional abundance were analyzed with the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. The correlations
between biomarkers and their statistical significance were assessed using Pearson’s
correlation coefficient and Student’s t distribution, respectively.For the animal studies, sample means and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) calculated as the
mean plus or minus 1.96 times the standard error of the mean, which is equivalent to the
95% confidence interval, were plotted to visualize changes in tumor volume over time.
Differences in tumor volume were compared using mixed-effects linear models that included
a random subject effect with a heterogeneous autoregressive variance-covariance structure
to account for intra-animal correlation across time points. The models contained fixed
effects for treatment, time point, and the interaction of these main effects.
Satterthwaite’s method was used to calculate the denominator degrees of freedom for the
F-tests of the fixed and simple effects in order to account for the variance
heterogeneity. For proliferation, migration, and apoptosis assays, the Student’s
t test or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare
group differences. For all analyses, a two-tailed P value of less than
.05 was considered statistically significant.
In Vitro Cellular Analyses
Cell proliferation, cellular nitrate, and nitrite, migration, and immunoprecipitation
assays were performed as described in the Supplementary Methods (available online).
Immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemical analyses are detailed in the Supplementary Methods (available online).
Results
Prevalence of RPL39 A14V Mutation in Metaplastic Breast
Cancer
Utilizing a published database of 457 TNBC patients (24), we found that high RPL39 expression was directly correlated
with reduced OS (hazard ratio = 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.55 to 0.91,
P = .006) (Figure 1A). CAST
PCR and ddPCR were used to determine RPL39A14V mutation rate and
fractional abundance in tumor samples from patients with histologically confirmed
metaplastic breast cancer (n = 40) and basal-like TNBC (n = 40) and available clinical
outcome data. RPL39A14V mutation rate (97.5% [39/40] vs 0% [0/40];
Fisher’s exact test, P < .001) (Figure 1B) and fractional abundance (Wilcoxon rank-sum test,
P = .03) (Figure 1C) were
statistically significantly higher in metaplastic breast cancer compared with basal-like
TNBC. To ensure that the metaplastic breast cancerpatient cohort was not skewing the
data, the frequency of common mutations identified in TNBC was evaluated.
Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha
H1047R and E545K mutations were present in 10% (4/40) of primary TNBCs and 17.5% (7/40) of
metaplastic breast cancers, which is consistent with previously published rates (20). Together, these findings demonstrate the
high prevalence of RPL39A14V mutation in metaplastic breast cancer.
Figure 1.
RPL39 (A14V) mutation status analyzed in metaplastic breast
cancer. A) The relationship between ribosomal protein L39 (RPL39)
expression and overall survival was assessed among 457 triple-negative breast cancer
(TNBC) patients. The P value was calculated using a log-rank test.
B)RPL39 A14V mutation rate was determined by
competitive allele-specific TaqMan (CAST) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis
of tumor samples from patients with nonmetaplastic and metaplastic breast cancer
(each n = 40). Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the mutation rate in
metaplastic breast cancer vs nonmetaplastic breast cancer. PIK3CA
mutations (H1047R and E545K) rates are also shown. C) The results of
the CAST PCR analysis were confirmed by droplet digital PCR. Wilcoxon rank-sum test
was used to determine statistically significant differences in the fractional
abundance of the RPL39 A14V mutation between metaplastic breast
cancer and TNBC. We used a threshold of 0.1% fractional abundance to define low
RPL39 expression level. All statistical tests were two-sided. CI = confidence
interval; HR = hazard ratio; MBC = metaplastic breast cancer; TNBC = triple-negative
breast cancer.
RPL39 (A14V) mutation status analyzed in metaplastic breast
cancer. A) The relationship between ribosomal protein L39 (RPL39)
expression and overall survival was assessed among 457 triple-negative breast cancer
(TNBC) patients. The P value was calculated using a log-rank test.
B)RPL39A14V mutation rate was determined by
competitive allele-specific TaqMan (CAST) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis
of tumor samples from patients with nonmetaplastic and metaplastic breast cancer
(each n = 40). Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the mutation rate in
metaplastic breast cancer vs nonmetaplastic breast cancer. PIK3CA
mutations (H1047R and E545K) rates are also shown. C) The results of
the CAST PCR analysis were confirmed by droplet digital PCR. Wilcoxon rank-sum test
was used to determine statistically significant differences in the fractional
abundance of the RPL39A14V mutation between metaplastic breast
cancer and TNBC. We used a threshold of 0.1% fractional abundance to define low
RPL39 expression level. All statistical tests were two-sided. CI = confidence
interval; HR = hazard ratio; MBC = metaplastic breast cancer; TNBC = triple-negative
breast cancer.Next, to confirm that the RPL39A14V mutation was not a
single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), RNA deep sequencing analysis was performed on 20
normal breast tissues. Results, presented as total counts for specified nucleotides within
each sample (Supplementary Table
1, available online), indicated that RPL39A14V is unlikely to
be an SNP. We also analyzed the correlation between RPL39A14V mutation
and iNOS level. The correlation did not reach statistical significance because of the
small sample size (Supplementary Figure
1 and Supplementary Table
2, available online). Given the rarity of metaplastic breast cancer, sufficient
patient samples to accurately assess the correlation between RPL39A14V
mutation and iNOS level would be difficult to obtain.
Correlation of iNOS level With OS in Metaplastic Breast Cancer
We previously reported that RPL39 regulates iNOS expression in TNBC
(22) and downregulation of iNOS signaling
reduces tumor growth (27). We and others
have also reported that high iNOS expression level is associated with worse survival in
TNBC patients (27,28). iNOS levels were immunohistochemically evaluated in the
same cohort of metaplastic breast cancerpatienttumor samples used for
RPL39 mutation analysis. OS was statistically significantly shorter for
metaplastic breast cancerpatients in the high iNOS expression group compared with those
in the low iNOS expression group (log-rank test, P = .003) (Figure 2). These results indicate that increased
iNOS expression is a poor prognostic indicator in metaplastic breast cancer.
Figure 2.
Correlation between inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) expression and patient
overall survival in metaplastic breast cancer. iNOS expression levels were evaluated
by immunohistochemical analysis in a cohort of metaplastic breast cancer patient
tumor samples (n = 40). The graph presents Kaplan-Meier estimated survival curves
for the high and low iNOS expression groups. A two-sided log-rank test was used to
determine the statistical significance of the observed difference in survival. iNOS
= inducible nitric oxide synthase.
Correlation between inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) expression and patient
overall survival in metaplastic breast cancer. iNOS expression levels were evaluated
by immunohistochemical analysis in a cohort of metaplastic breast cancerpatienttumor samples (n = 40). The graph presents Kaplan-Meier estimated survival curves
for the high and low iNOS expression groups. A two-sided log-rank test was used to
determine the statistical significance of the observed difference in survival. iNOS
= inducible nitric oxide synthase.
Effect of iNOS Inhibition on Metaplastic Breast Cancer Cell Proliferation and
Migration
To determine the functional relevance of iNOS, the metaplastic-like breast cancer cell
lines HS578T and BT549 were treated with the pan-NOS inhibitor
NG-methyl-L-arginine acetate (L-NMMA) (27). The HS578T and BT549 cell lines have been reported to possess metaplastic
genotypic characteristics (23) and do not
carry the RPL39A14V mutation. L-NMMA-mediated iNOS inhibition
statistically significantly reduced cell proliferation and migration in a dose-dependent
manner in both cells lines (one-way ANOVA, P = .04 and
P = .02, respectively) (Figure
3, A and B). As metaplastic breast cancers are highly chemoresistant, we
investigated whether L-NMMA increases the sensitivity of HS578T and BT549 cells to
docetaxel. Compared with vehicle control cells, L-NMMA alone did not statistically
significantly increase the number of apoptotic cells (Figure 3C). However, L-NMMA statistically significantly enhanced
docetaxel-mediated apoptosis, as evidenced by the greater number of Annexin V–positive
cells (one-way ANOVA, P = .03) (Figure 3C). Together, our findings indicate that iNOS inhibition demonstrates
potent anticancer effects and decreases chemoresistance in metaplastic breast cancer
cells. Additionally, we analyzed the effect of iNOS inhibition on RPL39 expression and
found that RPL39 expression was reduced by both L-NMMA and iNOS siRNA (Supplementary Figure 2, available
online).
Figure 3.
Role of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) inhibition in metaplastic breast
cancer cell proliferation and migration in vitro. A) Metaplastic breast
cancer cell lines HS578T and BT549 were treated with vehicle control or the
indicated concentrations of L-NMMA for 72 hours. Proliferation was assessed by WST1
assay (HS578T: mean = 0.76, SD = 0.03, P = .04;
BT549: mean = 0.74, SD = 0.01, P = .04). B) Migration
by scratch assay was determined in HS578T and BT549 cells treated with vehicle
control or 1 mM L-NMMA for 72 hours. (HS578T: mean = 12, SD = 1.5,
P = .02; BT549: mean = 24, SD = 3.4, P = .02).
C) HS578T and BT549 cells were treated with vehicle control, L-NMMA
alone (1 mM), docetaxel alone (1 nM), or combined docetaxel and L-NMMA for 72 hours
and the number of apoptotic cells determined by Annexin V staining (docetaxel vs
combination therapy, HS578T, mean = 23.8, SD = 4.1, P = .03; BT549
mean = 22.1, SD = 1.8, P = .03). Data presented are based on three
independent experiments, and error bars represent the standard
deviation. P values were calculated using one-way analysis of
variance, followed by the Tukey test for pairwise comparisons. All statistical tests
were two-sided.
Role of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) inhibition in metaplastic breast
cancer cell proliferation and migration in vitro. A) Metaplastic breast
cancer cell lines HS578T and BT549 were treated with vehicle control or the
indicated concentrations of L-NMMA for 72 hours. Proliferation was assessed by WST1
assay (HS578T: mean = 0.76, SD = 0.03, P = .04;
BT549: mean = 0.74, SD = 0.01, P = .04). B) Migration
by scratch assay was determined in HS578T and BT549 cells treated with vehicle
control or 1 mM L-NMMA for 72 hours. (HS578T: mean = 12, SD = 1.5,
P = .02; BT549: mean = 24, SD = 3.4, P = .02).
C) HS578T and BT549 cells were treated with vehicle control, L-NMMA
alone (1 mM), docetaxel alone (1 nM), or combined docetaxel and L-NMMA for 72 hours
and the number of apoptotic cells determined by Annexin V staining (docetaxel vs
combination therapy, HS578T, mean = 23.8, SD = 4.1, P = .03; BT549
mean = 22.1, SD = 1.8, P = .03). Data presented are based on three
independent experiments, and error bars represent the standard
deviation. P values were calculated using one-way analysis of
variance, followed by the Tukey test for pairwise comparisons. All statistical tests
were two-sided.
Effect of RPL39 on the In Vivo Response to L-NMMA in Metaplastic Breast
Cancer
To investigate the effect of RPL39 on the in vivo response to L-NMMA, we used
RPL39A14V mutation–positive (BCM-4664) and –negative (BCM-3807)
metaplastic breast cancerpatient-derived xenografts (PDXs). Despite the difference in
RPL39 mutation status, both BCM-4664 and BCM-3807 tumors showed high
iNOS expression levels. L-NMMA statistically significantly reduced tumor volume in both
the BCM-4664 and BCM-3807 models compared with the vehicle control (F-tests,
P = .04 and P = .02, respectively) (Figure 4A). Compared with vehicle, L-NMMA
substantially reduced iNOS expression in both the BCM-4664 and BCM-3807 models, verifying
target engagement (Figure 4B). Furthermore,
L-NMMA in combination with docetaxel statistically significantly reduced tumor volume in
the BCM-4664 model compared with docetaxel alone (F-test, P = .007)
(Figure 4C). As BCM-3807 is highly
chemosensitive, combination effects were not observed (Supplementary Figure 3, available
online). These findings suggest that iNOS-expressing metaplastic breast cancers are
responsive to iNOS inhibition with L-NMMA regardless of RPL39 mutation
status and mechanisms other than RPL39A14V mutation may regulate iNOS
expression.
Figure 4.
Testing the impact of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) inhibition on in vivo
tumor growth and chemoresistance in metaplastic breast cancer. A) The
effect of iNOS inhibition on in vivo tumor growth was determined using two
metaplastic breast cancer patient-derived xenograft models, BCM-4664 and BCM-3807.
Mice (n = 10 per group) were treated with vehicle (saline, intraperitoneal [i.p.],
daily) or L-NMMA (200 mg/kg, i.p., daily) for 28 days. Tumor volume was measured
twice weekly. P values were calculated using Student’s
t test. Data are presented as the mean, with the error
bars representing 95% confidence intervals (1.96SEM). B)
Target engagement was verified by immunohistochemical analysis of iNOS expression in
L-NMMA-treated BCM-4664 and BCM-3807 tumors. C) BCM-4664 mice were
treated with docetaxel alone (20 mg/kg, i.p., once every 14 days) or in combination
with L-NMMA for 42 days. Tumor volume was measured twice weekly. Data were analyzed
using Student’s t test and presented as the mean ± 95% confidence
interval (1.96 SEM). All statistical tests were two-sided.
Testing the impact of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) inhibition on in vivo
tumor growth and chemoresistance in metaplastic breast cancer. A) The
effect of iNOS inhibition on in vivo tumor growth was determined using two
metaplastic breast cancerpatient-derived xenograft models, BCM-4664 and BCM-3807.
Mice (n = 10 per group) were treated with vehicle (saline, intraperitoneal [i.p.],
daily) or L-NMMA (200 mg/kg, i.p., daily) for 28 days. Tumor volume was measured
twice weekly. P values were calculated using Student’s
t test. Data are presented as the mean, with the error
bars representing 95% confidence intervals (1.96SEM). B)
Target engagement was verified by immunohistochemical analysis of iNOS expression in
L-NMMA-treated BCM-4664 and BCM-3807 tumors. C) BCM-4664 mice were
treated with docetaxel alone (20 mg/kg, i.p., once every 14 days) or in combination
with L-NMMA for 42 days. Tumor volume was measured twice weekly. Data were analyzed
using Student’s t test and presented as the mean ± 95% confidence
interval (1.96 SEM). All statistical tests were two-sided.
Determination of RPL39 Signal Transduction Pathway in Metaplastic Breast
Cancer
As our data indicate a role of RPL39 and iNOS in metaplastic breast cancer, we
investigated the linking pathways using in silico data analysis (ingenuity pathway
analysis) (Supplementary Figure
4, available online). Ingenuity pathway analysis identified a signaling pathway
linking iNOS to ubiquitin C (UBC) and adenosine deaminase acting on RNA 1 (ADAR1). UBC is
a ubiquitin-encoding gene that has been implicated in DNA repair and NOS signaling. The
RNA-editing protein ADAR1 has recently been reported to play a role in cancer stem cell
(CSC) self-renewal and to be associated with signal transducer and activator of
transcription 3 (STAT3) pathway activation. Based on the results of the pathway analysis,
we hypothesized that UBC may bind to both ADAR1 and RPL39 to activate iNOS signaling
(Figure 5A). To investigate the in vivo
interactions among these proteins, immunoblot analysis and co-immunoprecipitation assays
were performed. Both RPL39 overexpression and A14V mutation increased ADAR1 and
phosphorylated STAT3 expression (Figure 5B).
Co-immunoprecipitation with anti-UBC revealed that UBC directly interacts with ADAR1 and
RPL39 (Figure 5C), whereas
co-immunoprecipitation with anti-ADAR1 showed that ADAR1 interacted with UBC but not RPL39
(Figure 5D). These data suggest an
intermediary role for UBC in the RPL39 and ADAR1 interaction.
Figure 5.
Signal transduction pathway of RPL39 in metaplastic breast cancer. A)
Ingenuity pathway analysis was done to identify potential links between RPL39 and
iNOS. B) Immunoblot analysis of ADAR1 and phosphorylated STAT3 was
performed in HS578T and BT549 cells transfected with a plasmid to overexpress RPL39
or RPL39 A14V. C) Ubiquitin C (UBC) was
immunoprecipitated from HS578T and BT549 cell extracts. Immunoprecipitates were
immunoblotted to detect the presence of the indicated proteins. D)
ADAR1 was immunoprecipitated from HS578T and BT549 cell extracts. Immunoprecipitates
were immunoblotted to detect the presence of the indicated proteins. E)
Immunoblot analysis was performed to determine the expression of UBC, iNOS, and
RPL39 in RPL39-overexpressing and siRNA-treated HS578T and BT549 cells.
F) Immunoblot analysis was performed to determine the expression of
iNOS, ADAR1, and phosphorylated STAT3 in iNOS and RPL39 in RPL39-overexpressing
HS578T and BT549 cells treated with RPL39 or iNOS siRNA. G) Schematic
of the proposed RPL39/UBC/ADAR1/iNOS/STAT3 signaling pathway is shown. β-actin
served as a loading control in (B–F). ADAR1 = adenosine deaminase
acting on RNA 1; IB = immunoblot; iNOS = inducible nitric oxide synthase; IP =
immunoprecipitate; p = phosphorylated; RPL39 = ribosomal protein L39; STAT3 = signal
transducer and activator of transcription 3; UBC = ubiquitin C.
Signal transduction pathway of RPL39 in metaplastic breast cancer. A)
Ingenuity pathway analysis was done to identify potential links between RPL39 and
iNOS. B) Immunoblot analysis of ADAR1 and phosphorylated STAT3 was
performed in HS578T and BT549 cells transfected with a plasmid to overexpress RPL39
or RPL39A14V. C) Ubiquitin C (UBC) was
immunoprecipitated from HS578T and BT549 cell extracts. Immunoprecipitates were
immunoblotted to detect the presence of the indicated proteins. D)
ADAR1 was immunoprecipitated from HS578T and BT549 cell extracts. Immunoprecipitates
were immunoblotted to detect the presence of the indicated proteins. E)
Immunoblot analysis was performed to determine the expression of UBC, iNOS, and
RPL39 in RPL39-overexpressing and siRNA-treated HS578T and BT549 cells.
F) Immunoblot analysis was performed to determine the expression of
iNOS, ADAR1, and phosphorylated STAT3 in iNOS and RPL39 in RPL39-overexpressing
HS578T and BT549 cells treated with RPL39 or iNOS siRNA. G) Schematic
of the proposed RPL39/UBC/ADAR1/iNOS/STAT3 signaling pathway is shown. β-actin
served as a loading control in (B–F). ADAR1 = adenosine deaminase
acting on RNA 1; IB = immunoblot; iNOS = inducible nitric oxide synthase; IP =
immunoprecipitate; p = phosphorylated; RPL39 = ribosomal protein L39; STAT3 = signal
transducer and activator of transcription 3; UBC = ubiquitin C.Next, we deciphered the sequence of signaling events activated by RPL39. To further
investigate the association between RPL39 and UBC, immunoblot analysis of
RPL39-overexpressing and RPL39 siRNA-treated HS578T and BT549 cells was performed. RPL39
overexpression increased UBC expression in both BT549 and HS578T cells (Figure 5E). siRNA-mediated RPL39 downregulation
decreased UBC expression in the BT549, but not the HS578T, cell line (Figure 5E). Changes in UBC expression mirrored those in iNOS
expression (Figure 5E). We also tested the
effect of RPL39 on ADAR1 expression. RPL39 overexpression and A14V mutation increased the
expression of ADAR1 and phosphorylated STAT3 in HS578T and BT549 cells (Figure 5B). Furthermore, siRNA-mediated RPL39, but
not iNOS, knockdown reduced ADAR1 expression in RPL39-overexpressing HS578T and BT549
cells, suggesting that ADAR1 is downstream of RPL39 and upstream of iNOS (Figure 5F). Furthermore, siRNA-mediated RPL39 and
iNOS knockdown reduced phosphorylated STAT3 expression, suggesting that STAT3 is
downstream of ADAR1 and iNOS (Figure 5F). A
schematic of the proposed RPL39 signaling pathway is shown in Figure 5G. These data indicate that the RNA-editing enzyme ADAR1
drives iNOS signaling and a STAT3-dependent signaling pathway in metaplastic breast
cancer.
Role of RPL39 in Metaplastic Breast Cancer Cell Proliferation and Migration
Whole-exome sequencing has previously shown the greatest fold-changes in RNA editing
frequency in specific loci of CSCs (29).
These sites were located within transcripts of the cytidine deaminase apolipoprotein B
mRNA editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide-like 3D (APOBEC3D); GLI family
zinc finger 1(GLI1); antizyme inhibitor 1 (AZIN1); and
ubiquitin ligase human homolog of mouse double minute 2 (MDM2). Analysis
of editing rates from the RNA-seq data set showed increased RNA editing of
APOBEC3D, and GLI1, AZIN1, and
MDM2 in CSCs (29). RNA
editing site-specific quantitative PCR also revealed increased RNA editing of
APOBEC3D, GLI1, AZIN1, and
MDM2 transcripts in lentiviral ADAR1-expressing cells (29).As RPL39 increases ADAR1 expression, we investigated the role of RPL39 in the RNA editing
of these genes. Overexpression of RPL39 in HS578T and BT549 cell lines statistically
significantly increased the edited forms of APOBC3D,
GLI1, and AZN1 RNA (Figure 6, A and B), but not MDM2 (data not
shown), further confirming a role for RNA editing in the RPL39-mediated signaling pathway
in metaplastic breast cancer.
Figure 6.
Role of RPL39 and RNA editing in metaplastic breast cancer cell proliferation and
migration. A and B) RNA editing analysis is shown for
ABOBEC3D, GLI1, and AZIN1 in
RPL39-overexpressing HS578T and BT549 cells (HS578T cells:
ABOBEC3D, mean = 16.1, SD = 2.8, P = .03;
GLI1, mean = 17.2, SD = 3.1, P = .04;
AZIN1, mean = 21.4, SD = 1.8, P = .02) (BT549
cells: ABOBEC3D, mean = 2.1, SD = 0.3, P = .02;
GLI1, mean = 1.6, SD = 0.2, P = .04;
AZIN1, mean = 1.9, SD = 0.2, P = .04).
C) Immunoblot analysis with the indicated antibodies was performed
using cell lysates from RPL39-overexpressing HS578T and BT549 cells treated with
ADAR1-specific siRNA. D) Migration (P < .001) and
(E) proliferation indices were measured in HS578T control cells,
RPL39-overexpressing cells, and RPL39-overexpressing cells treated with
ADAR1-specific siRNA (P < .001). Error bars
represent standard deviation from the mean. Two-sided Student’s t
test was used to calculate the P values. ADAR1 = adenosine
deaminase acting on RNA 1; APOBEC3D = catalytic polypeptide-like 3D; AZIN1 =
antizyme inhibitor 1; GLI1 = GLI family zinc finger 1; iNOS = inducible nitric oxide
synthase; MDM2 = mouse double minute 2; RPL39 = ribosomal protein L39; UBC =
ubiquitin C.
Role of RPL39 and RNA editing in metaplastic breast cancer cell proliferation and
migration. A and B) RNA editing analysis is shown for
ABOBEC3D, GLI1, and AZIN1 in
RPL39-overexpressing HS578T and BT549 cells (HS578T cells:
ABOBEC3D, mean = 16.1, SD = 2.8, P = .03;
GLI1, mean = 17.2, SD = 3.1, P = .04;
AZIN1, mean = 21.4, SD = 1.8, P = .02) (BT549
cells: ABOBEC3D, mean = 2.1, SD = 0.3, P = .02;
GLI1, mean = 1.6, SD = 0.2, P = .04;
AZIN1, mean = 1.9, SD = 0.2, P = .04).
C) Immunoblot analysis with the indicated antibodies was performed
using cell lysates from RPL39-overexpressing HS578T and BT549 cells treated with
ADAR1-specific siRNA. D) Migration (P < .001) and
(E) proliferation indices were measured in HS578T control cells,
RPL39-overexpressing cells, and RPL39-overexpressing cells treated with
ADAR1-specific siRNA (P < .001). Error bars
represent standard deviation from the mean. Two-sided Student’s t
test was used to calculate the P values. ADAR1 = adenosine
deaminase acting on RNA 1; APOBEC3D = catalytic polypeptide-like 3D; AZIN1 =
antizyme inhibitor 1; GLI1 = GLI family zinc finger 1; iNOS = inducible nitric oxide
synthase; MDM2 = mouse double minute 2; RPL39 = ribosomal protein L39; UBC =
ubiquitin C.To determine whether RPL39-mediated iNOS signaling is modulated by ADAR1, iNOS expression
was determined in RPL39-overexpressing HS578T and BT549 cells treated with ADAR1-specific
siRNA. ADAR1 knockdown inhibited iNOS, but not RPL39, expression (Figure 6C), indicating that ADAR1 is downstream of RPL39 and
upstream of iNOS. UBC expression was unaffected by ADAR1 knockdown, suggesting that UBC
acts as bridge between RPL39 and ADAR1 rather than having a direct functional role.
Additionally, ADAR1 knockdown affected cell migration (Figure 6D) and proliferation (Figure 6E) in RPL39-overexpressing cells. Together, these results
indicate that RPL39 signals through an ADAR1/iNOS/STAT3 pathway in metaplastic breast
cancer.
Discussion
Metaplastic breast cancer is an exceedingly rare, highly lethal, and chemotherapy-resistant
TNBC (30). Targeted therapies for metaplastic
breast cancer are currently not available; therefore, understanding the molecular mechanisms
underlying its tumorigenesis is key to developing effective therapies. Hennesey et al.
(21) demonstrated that metaplastic breast
cancertumors were phenotypically similar to claudin-low subtype, with an increased CSC
component (20). Thus, we hypothesized that
mutations previously described in CSCs may play a pivotal role in metaplastic breast cancer.
In the present study, we found that the prevalence of the RPL39A14V
mutation is nearly ubiquitous in metaplastic breast cancer. High cytoplasmic iNOS level was
associated with statistically significantly worse OS in patients with metaplastic breast
cancer. These data provide evidence that iNOS is a valid therapeutic target for metaplastic
breast cancer.Previously, we identified the RPL39A14V mutation in TNBC cells and found
that it conferred a growth advantage (22).
Additionally, RPL39 knockdown reduced the number of CD44+/CD24-/low
and tumor-initiating cells, mammosphere formation efficiency, and lung metastases (22). Mechanistically, RPL39 increased
iNOS-mediated NO production (22). High iNOS
expression was associated with worse survival in patients with basal-like TNBC (27). Importantly, we demonstrated that
L-NMMA-mediated iNOS inhibition suppressed TNBC tumorigenicity by decreasing proliferation,
CSC self-renewal, and migration (27). In the
present study, we found that iNOS inhibition with L-NMMA statistically significantly
decreased proliferation and migration in vitro and statistically significantly enhanced
docetaxel-mediated apoptosis in vitro in the metaplastic-like breast cancer cell lines
HS578T and BT549. Our in vitro findings were corroborated in vivo. L-NMMA statistically
significantly reduced tumor volume in the BCM-4664 (RPL39A14V
mutation–positive) and BCM-3807 (RPL39A14V mutation–negative) metaplastic
PDXs. Together, our in vitro and in vivo findings indicate that L-NMMA may be an effective
therapeutic option for metaplastic breast cancer. L-NMMA decreased tumor volume in
metaplastic PDXs regardless of RPL39 mutational status, suggesting that
high iNOS expression in metaplastic breast cancer may be dependent on RPL39-independent
pathways.Our study is not without limitations. The number of patient samples in the study was small
primarily because of the rarity of the disease. The small sample size prevented accurate
analysis of the correlation of RPL39 and iNOS expression with survival. Furthermore, the
impact of RPL39 on the iNOS-mediated NO pathway was limited to the in vitro analysis of
cellular nitrate and nitrite levels. In vivo biophysical analysis of NO metabolites such as
peroxinitrate, reactive nitrogen species, and reactive oxygen species in the context of the
stromal microenvironment may provide additional mechanistic insights into the role of NO in
metaplastic breast cancer. We plan in future studies to investigate the role of NO and
related species in metaplastic breast cancer through comprehensive analysis involving
biophysical, immunohistochemical, and mass spectrometric techniques.We investigated the mechanism of action of RPL39 and iNOS in metaplastic breast cancer
using in silico data analysis (ingenuity pathway analysis) and identified ADAR1 and UBC as
important components of the RPL39/iNOS-mediated signaling pathway in metaplastic breast
cancer. ADAR1 has recently been implicated in STAT3-dependent signaling in CSCs (29). This pathway may be directly edited in the
CSC self-renewal of other cancers (29). In the
present study, RNA editing was found to play a critical role in the RPL39/iNOS-mediated
signaling pathway. Our results demonstrating the role of iNOS and RNA editing in metaplastic
breast cancer provide a meaningful advancement in the development of potential therapeutic
avenues for this highly lethal disease. The ability of ribosomal proteins to affect cellular
translational capacity through RNA editing is a critical avenue of research for metaplastic
breast cancer. Mutations in genes involved in ribosome function may play a crucial role in
cancer survival and may allow for the development of novel targeted therapies for
therapy-resistant cancers.
Funding
This work was funded by AUP-1010-0025 Chan Soon Shiong Institute of Advanced Health (JCC)
and BCRF (JCC). Foundation Grants were awarded to JCC for studying novel therapeutics of
breast cancer.
Notes
The study funders had no role in the design of the study; the collection, analysis, or
interpretation of the data; the writing of the manuscript; or the decision to submit the
manuscript for publication.Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Bryan T Hennessy; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Sharon Giordano; Thomas A Buchholz; Shu W Kau; Zhigang Duan; Vicente Valero; Gabriel N Hortobagyi Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-11-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Joseph H Taube; Jason I Herschkowitz; Kakajan Komurov; Alicia Y Zhou; Supriya Gupta; Jing Yang; Kimberly Hartwell; Tamer T Onder; Piyush B Gupta; Kurt W Evans; Brett G Hollier; Prahlad T Ram; Eric S Lander; Jeffrey M Rosen; Robert A Weinberg; Sendurai A Mani Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-08-16 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Bryan T Hennessy; Ana-Maria Gonzalez-Angulo; Katherine Stemke-Hale; Michael Z Gilcrease; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Ju-Seog Lee; Jane Fridlyand; Aysegul Sahin; Roshan Agarwal; Corwin Joy; Wenbin Liu; David Stivers; Keith Baggerly; Mark Carey; Ana Lluch; Carlos Monteagudo; Xiaping He; Victor Weigman; Cheng Fan; Juan Palazzo; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Laura K Nolden; Nicholas J Wang; Vicente Valero; Joe W Gray; Charles M Perou; Gordon B Mills Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2009-05-12 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Bracha Erlanger Avigdor; Katie Beierl; Christopher D Gocke; Daniel J Zabransky; Karen Cravero; Kelly Kyker-Snowman; Berry Button; David Chu; Sarah Croessmann; Rory L Cochran; Roisin M Connolly; Ben H Park; Sarah J Wheelan; Ashley Cimino-Mathews Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-04-19 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Zhe-Bin Liu; Nader E Ezzedine; Agda K Eterovic; Joe E Ensor; Helen J Huang; Joan Albanell; Dong S Choi; Ana Lluch; Yi Liu; Federico Rojo; Helen Wong; Eduardo Martínez-Dueñas; Ángel Guerrero-Zotano; Zhi-Min Shao; Jorge G Darcourt; Gordon B Mills; Bhuvanesh Dave; Jenny C Chang Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2019-08-06 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Dimakatso Alice Senthebane; Arielle Rowe; Nicholas Ekow Thomford; Hendrina Shipanga; Daniella Munro; Mohammad A M Al Mazeedi; Hashim A M Almazyadi; Karlien Kallmeyer; Collet Dandara; Michael S Pepper; M Iqbal Parker; Kevin Dzobo Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2017-07-21 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Lei Nie; Yongkun Wei; Fei Zhang; Yi-Hsin Hsu; Li-Chuan Chan; Weiya Xia; Baozhen Ke; Cihui Zhu; Rong Deng; Jun Tang; Jun Yao; Yu-Yi Chu; Xixi Zhao; Ye Han; Junwei Hou; Longfei Huo; How-Wen Ko; Wan-Chi Lin; Hirohito Yamaguchi; Jung-Mao Hsu; Yi Yang; Dean N Pan; Jennifer L Hsu; Celina G Kleer; Nancy E Davidson; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Mien-Chie Hung Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2019-11-08 Impact factor: 14.919