Tingting Tao1, Xuehua Jiang1, Yuehong Chen2, Yiran Song3. 1. Key Laboratory of Drug Targeting and Drug Delivery System, Ministry of Education, West China School of Pharmacy, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China. 2. Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China. 3. Eli Lilly and Company, Suzhou, Jiangzu, People's Republic of China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The addition of ribavirin (RBV) to the combination treatment of Ledipasvir (LDV) and Sofosbuvir (SOF) remains controversial in the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of the LDV-SOF with and without RBV in treating HCV genotype 1 patients. METHOD: The electronical databases of PubMed Medline, EMBASE database, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and ClinicalTrials.gov website with registered trials were searched. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies that assessed the efficacy and safety of LDV-SOF with or without RBV in patients with HCV genotype 1 (GT 1). Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data and assessed methodology quality. Review Manager 5.3 software was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Seven studies involving 2,626 patients with HCV GT 1 - some of whom had cirrhosis - were included in this meta-analysis. The addition of RBV to LDV- SOF regimen neither significantly improved sustained viral response at 12 weeks (SVR12) after the last dose of treatment (RR=1.00, 95%CI 0.99-1.01, p=0.99) nor decreased virologic breakthrough (RR=1.01, 95%CI 0.14-7.19, p=0.99) and relapse (RR=1.36, 95% CI 0.81-2.29, p=0.24). There was no significant difference in the incidence of discontinuation (RR=0.61, 95%CI 0.25-1.53, p=0.30) between LDV- SOF therapy and LDV- SOF plus RBV. LDV- SOF plus RBV therapy had significantly higher rate of the overall adverse events (RR=0.88, 95%CI=0.84- 0.92, p<0.00001). LDV - SOF therapy had higher incidence of serious adverse events (RR=1.60, 95%CI=1.00-2.56, p=0.05) than LDV-SOF plus RBV. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that LDV-SOF based therapy is a safe and effective treatment for patients with GT 1 HCV. The addition of RBV to LDV-SOF may increase toxicity without achieving improved efficacy. However, due to the relatively small sample sizes and moderate risk of bias of included studies, large-scale and high-quality clinical research is still needed to confirm the results.
BACKGROUND: The addition of ribavirin (RBV) to the combination treatment of Ledipasvir (LDV) and Sofosbuvir (SOF) remains controversial in the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of the LDV-SOF with and without RBV in treating HCV genotype 1 patients. METHOD: The electronical databases of PubMed Medline, EMBASE database, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and ClinicalTrials.gov website with registered trials were searched. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies that assessed the efficacy and safety of LDV-SOF with or without RBV in patients with HCV genotype 1 (GT 1). Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data and assessed methodology quality. Review Manager 5.3 software was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Seven studies involving 2,626 patients with HCV GT 1 - some of whom had cirrhosis - were included in this meta-analysis. The addition of RBV to LDV- SOF regimen neither significantly improved sustained viral response at 12 weeks (SVR12) after the last dose of treatment (RR=1.00, 95%CI 0.99-1.01, p=0.99) nor decreased virologic breakthrough (RR=1.01, 95%CI 0.14-7.19, p=0.99) and relapse (RR=1.36, 95% CI 0.81-2.29, p=0.24). There was no significant difference in the incidence of discontinuation (RR=0.61, 95%CI 0.25-1.53, p=0.30) between LDV- SOF therapy and LDV- SOF plus RBV. LDV- SOF plus RBV therapy had significantly higher rate of the overall adverse events (RR=0.88, 95%CI=0.84- 0.92, p<0.00001). LDV - SOF therapy had higher incidence of serious adverse events (RR=1.60, 95%CI=1.00-2.56, p=0.05) than LDV-SOF plus RBV. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that LDV-SOF based therapy is a safe and effective treatment for patients with GT 1 HCV. The addition of RBV to LDV-SOF may increase toxicity without achieving improved efficacy. However, due to the relatively small sample sizes and moderate risk of bias of included studies, large-scale and high-quality clinical research is still needed to confirm the results.
Authors: Joseph K Lim; Ann Marie Liapakis; Mitchell L Shiffman; Anna S Lok; Stefan Zeuzem; Norah A Terrault; James S Park; Charles S Landis; Mohamed Hassan; Joel Gallant; Alexander Kuo; Paul J Pockros; Monika Vainorius; Lucy Akushevich; Larry Michael; Michael W Fried; David R Nelson; Ziv Ben-Ari Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2018-01-03 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Hanaa A El-Araby; Behairy E Behairy; Mohamed A El-Guindi; Nermin M Adawy; Alif A Allam; Ahmad M Sira; Mohamed A Khedr; Ibrahim A Elhenawy; Gihan A Sobhy; Hosam El Din M Basiouny; Menan E Salem; Samira A Abdel-Aziz; Ola A Fouad; Bassam A Ayoub Journal: Hepatol Int Date: 2019-09-12 Impact factor: 9.029
Authors: Massimo Giuseppe Colombo; Erkin Isakovich Musabaev; Umed Yusupovich Ismailov; Igor A Zaytsev; Alexander V Nersesov; Igor Anatoliyevich Anastasiy; Igor Alexandrovich Karpov; Olga A Golubovska; Kulpash S Kaliaskarova; Ravishankar Ac; Sanjay Hadigal Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2019-08-07 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Elizabeth A McGlynn; John L Adams; Jason Kramer; Amandeep K Sahota; Michael J Silverberg; Elizabeth Shenkman; David R Nelson Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2019-06-05