Literature DB >> 28040543

Interactions between the default network and dorsal attention network vary across default subsystems, time, and cognitive states.

Matthew L Dixon1, Jessica R Andrews-Hanna2, R Nathan Spreng3, Zachary C Irving4, Caitlin Mills5, Manesh Girn5, Kalina Christoff6.   

Abstract

Anticorrelation between the default network (DN) and dorsal attention network (DAN) is thought to be an intrinsic aspect of functional brain organization reflecting competing functions. However, the effect size of functional connectivity (FC) between the DN and DAN has yet to be established. Furthermore, the stability of anticorrelations across distinct DN subsystems, different contexts, and time, remains unexplored. In study 1 we summarize effect sizes of DN-DAN FC from 20 studies, and in study 2 we probe the variability of DN-DAN interactions across six different cognitive states in a new data set. We show that: (i) the DN and DAN have an independent rather than anticorrelated relationship when global signal regression is not used (median effect size across studies: r=-.06; 95% CI: -.15 to .08); (ii) the DAN exhibits weak negative FC with the DN Core subsystem but is uncorrelated with the dorsomedial prefrontal and medial temporal lobe subsystems; (iii) DN-DAN interactions vary significantly across different cognitive states; (iv) DN-DAN FC fluctuates across time between periods of anticorrelation and periods of positive correlation; and (v) changes across time in the strength of DN-DAN coupling are coordinated with interactions involving the frontoparietal control network (FPCN). Overall, the observed weak effect sizes related to DN-DAN anticorrelation suggest the need to re-conceptualize the nature of interactions between these networks. Furthermore, our findings demonstrate that DN-DAN interactions are not stable, but rather, exhibit substantial variability across time and context, and are coordinated with broader network dynamics involving the FPCN.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Anticorrelation; Attention; Default network; Dorsal attention network; Dynamic functional connectivity; Frontoparietal control network

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28040543     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  52 in total

1.  Dissociated patterns of anti-correlations with dorsal and ventral default-mode networks at rest.

Authors:  Jingyuan E Chen; Gary H Glover; Michael D Greicius; Catie Chang
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  Towards a Universal Taxonomy of Macro-scale Functional Human Brain Networks.

Authors:  Lucina Q Uddin; B T Thomas Yeo; R Nathan Spreng
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Chronnectome fingerprinting: Identifying individuals and predicting higher cognitive functions using dynamic brain connectivity patterns.

Authors:  Jin Liu; Xuhong Liao; Mingrui Xia; Yong He
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Dynamic range in BOLD modulation: lifespan aging trajectories and association with performance.

Authors:  Kristen M Kennedy; Maria A Boylan; Jenny R Rieck; Chris M Foster; Karen M Rodrigue
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 4.673

5.  Brain networks of the imaginative mind: Dynamic functional connectivity of default and cognitive control networks relates to openness to experience.

Authors:  Roger E Beaty; Qunlin Chen; Alexander P Christensen; Jiang Qiu; Paul J Silvia; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Heterogeneity within the frontoparietal control network and its relationship to the default and dorsal attention networks.

Authors:  Matthew L Dixon; Alejandro De La Vega; Caitlin Mills; Jessica Andrews-Hanna; R Nathan Spreng; Michael W Cole; Kalina Christoff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Resting-state and Vocabulary Tasks Distinctively Inform On Age-Related Differences in the Functional Brain Connectome.

Authors:  Perrine Ferré; Yassine Benhajali; Jason Steffener; Yaakov Stern; Yves Joanette; Pierre Bellec
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 2.331

8.  Between-network Functional Connectivity Is Modified by Age and Cognitive Task Domain.

Authors:  Eleanna Varangis; Qolamreza Razlighi; Christian G Habeck; Zachary Fisher; Yaakov Stern
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 9.  A neurobehavioral account for decentering as the salve for the distressed mind.

Authors:  Anthony P King; David M Fresco
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2019-02-22

10.  Task-evoked functional connectivity does not explain functional connectivity differences between rest and task conditions.

Authors:  Lauren K Lynch; Kun-Han Lu; Haiguang Wen; Yizhen Zhang; Andrew J Saykin; Zhongming Liu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.