PURPOSE: Direct visualization of the posterior segment is not possible with conventional imaging techniques in eyes with corneal opacification. This study evaluated the efficacy of videoendoscopy in visualizing and hence prognosticating the visual outcomes in such eyes. DESIGN: Prospective, noncomparative, consecutive interventional case series. METHODS: This study included 64 eyes of 64 patients with corneal opacification who underwent a diagnostic ophthalmic endoscopy procedure from March 2014 to May 2016. All eyes also underwent conventional B-scan ultrasonography as part of their comprehensive ocular examination. The findings that were noted during endoscopy included the optic disc characteristics, anatomic integrity of the retina, and condition of the retinal blood vessels. The principal outcome measure was the determination of whether the results of the videoendoscopy helped in establishment of or brought a change in the management plan; accordingly, they were classified as either "contributory" or "noncontributory." RESULTS: The videoendoscopy findings were classified as contributory in 62 of 64 eyes. The remaining 2 eyes had vitreous hemorrhage; endoscopic vitrectomy was done in them to detect an inoperable retinal detachment in 1 eye. With the help of the stereoscopic picture of the fundus provided by the endoscope, a poor visual prognosis in 17 eyes with retinal detachment and 22 eyes with attached retina was determined. Additionally, in eyes that had an attached retina on ultrasound B-scan, the endoscope helped in detecting a glaucomatous disc in 10 of those eyes; 7 of them had glaucomatous optic atrophy. In 3 patients ultrasound did not detect a retinal detachment (false-negative). One eye with detached retina on ultrasound did not actually have a retinal detachment (false-positive). Thus ultrasound had a sensitivity of 88.4% and a specificity of 97.3% in detecting RD as compared with an endoscopic evaluation. Based on the endoscopic findings, 34 of 64 (53%) eyes were identified as having a better visual prognosis and underwent subsequent vision-restoring procedures. This included 10 (16%) patients who directly underwent a corneal procedure and 24 (37.5%) patients who had endoscopic vitreoretinal procedures initially before undergoing a corneal procedure. Endoscopy helped in identifying poor prognosis in 30 of 64 (46.8%) eyes; thus, further invasive procedures could be avoided. The endoscopy procedure in itself did not lead to any complications. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic endoscopy provided invaluable supplemental information about the posterior segment in eyes with corneal opacification. This helped in better prognostication and in reserving corneal reconstructive procedures for eyes with a favorable visual prognosis.
PURPOSE: Direct visualization of the posterior segment is not possible with conventional imaging techniques in eyes with corneal opacification. This study evaluated the efficacy of videoendoscopy in visualizing and hence prognosticating the visual outcomes in such eyes. DESIGN: Prospective, noncomparative, consecutive interventional case series. METHODS: This study included 64 eyes of 64 patients with corneal opacification who underwent a diagnostic ophthalmic endoscopy procedure from March 2014 to May 2016. All eyes also underwent conventional B-scan ultrasonography as part of their comprehensive ocular examination. The findings that were noted during endoscopy included the optic disc characteristics, anatomic integrity of the retina, and condition of the retinal blood vessels. The principal outcome measure was the determination of whether the results of the videoendoscopy helped in establishment of or brought a change in the management plan; accordingly, they were classified as either "contributory" or "noncontributory." RESULTS: The videoendoscopy findings were classified as contributory in 62 of 64 eyes. The remaining 2 eyes had vitreous hemorrhage; endoscopic vitrectomy was done in them to detect an inoperable retinal detachment in 1 eye. With the help of the stereoscopic picture of the fundus provided by the endoscope, a poor visual prognosis in 17 eyes with retinal detachment and 22 eyes with attached retina was determined. Additionally, in eyes that had an attached retina on ultrasound B-scan, the endoscope helped in detecting a glaucomatous disc in 10 of those eyes; 7 of them had glaucomatous optic atrophy. In 3 patients ultrasound did not detect a retinal detachment (false-negative). One eye with detached retina on ultrasound did not actually have a retinal detachment (false-positive). Thus ultrasound had a sensitivity of 88.4% and a specificity of 97.3% in detecting RD as compared with an endoscopic evaluation. Based on the endoscopic findings, 34 of 64 (53%) eyes were identified as having a better visual prognosis and underwent subsequent vision-restoring procedures. This included 10 (16%) patients who directly underwent a corneal procedure and 24 (37.5%) patients who had endoscopic vitreoretinal procedures initially before undergoing a corneal procedure. Endoscopy helped in identifying poor prognosis in 30 of 64 (46.8%) eyes; thus, further invasive procedures could be avoided. The endoscopy procedure in itself did not lead to any complications. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic endoscopy provided invaluable supplemental information about the posterior segment in eyes with corneal opacification. This helped in better prognostication and in reserving corneal reconstructive procedures for eyes with a favorable visual prognosis.