George Hruby1, Thomas Eade2, Andrew Kneebone2, Louise Emmett3, Lesley Guo4, Bao Ho5, Ed Hsiao6, Geoff Schembri6, Julia Hunter4, Carol Kwong4. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Australia; University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Genesis Cancer Care, Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: george.hruby@health.nsw.gov.au. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Australia; University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Genesis Cancer Care, Sydney, Australia. 3. University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Australia. 5. Department of Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Australia; University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. 6. Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET, Royal North Shore Hospital, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We investigated the role of 68Ga-PSMA-PET (PSMA) to determine the location of disease recurrence in those with a rising PSA following definitive external beam radiation treatment (EBRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 538men were treated with image guided EBRT to a dose of 78 or 82Gy between 2007 and 2014. Patients at least 24months post EBRT with biochemical failure (nadir+2) underwent PSMA scanning. Local recurrence (LR) was defined as increased uptake within the prostate or seminal vesicles. Distant disease included lymph node (LN), bone or visceral metastases. RESULTS: 419men formed the study cohort. Median follow-up was 50months, 70 patients (17%) had biochemical failure (BF), 13 of whom have died. Of the 57 survivors, 5 had metastases detected on conventional scans; 2 were lost to follow up. 48men (of 50 candidates) underwent PSMA; in all cases, the PSMA was unequivocally positive. Of the 48 positive scans, 25 patients (52%) failed beyond the prostate - 5 in bones, 16LN, 3 in both, and 1 in the lungs. Fifteen men (31%) failed within the gland and in either LN (11), bones (3), or both (1). Eight (17%) had an isolated LR, which represents 2% of patients managed with definitive EBRT and followed for at least 2years. CONCLUSIONS: PSMA was positive in all patients with BF. Site of failure following dose-escalated EBRT was generally distant. Isolated LR (on PSMA) occurred in only 8 of 419 patients post-EBRT. Crown
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We investigated the role of 68Ga-PSMA-PET (PSMA) to determine the location of disease recurrence in those with a rising PSA following definitive external beam radiation treatment (EBRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 538men were treated with image guided EBRT to a dose of 78 or 82Gy between 2007 and 2014. Patients at least 24months post EBRT with biochemical failure (nadir+2) underwent PSMA scanning. Local recurrence (LR) was defined as increased uptake within the prostate or seminal vesicles. Distant disease included lymph node (LN), bone or visceral metastases. RESULTS: 419men formed the study cohort. Median follow-up was 50months, 70 patients (17%) had biochemical failure (BF), 13 of whom have died. Of the 57 survivors, 5 had metastases detected on conventional scans; 2 were lost to follow up. 48men (of 50 candidates) underwent PSMA; in all cases, the PSMA was unequivocally positive. Of the 48 positive scans, 25 patients (52%) failed beyond the prostate - 5 in bones, 16LN, 3 in both, and 1 in the lungs. Fifteen men (31%) failed within the gland and in either LN (11), bones (3), or both (1). Eight (17%) had an isolated LR, which represents 2% of patients managed with definitive EBRT and followed for at least 2years. CONCLUSIONS:PSMA was positive in all patients with BF. Site of failure following dose-escalated EBRT was generally distant. Isolated LR (on PSMA) occurred in only 8 of 419 patients post-EBRT. Crown
Authors: Thomas A Hope; Jeremy Z Goodman; Isabel E Allen; Jeremie Calais; Wolfgang P Fendler; Peter R Carroll Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2018-12-07 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Mathieu Gaudreault; David Chang; Nicholas Hardcastle; Price Jackson; Tomas Kron; Michael S Hofman; Shankar Siva Journal: Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Date: 2022-05-17
Authors: Weranja Ranasinghe; Daniel D Shapiro; Miao Zhang; Tharakeswara Bathala; Nora Navone; Timothy C Thompson; Bradley Broom; Ana Aparicio; Shi-Ming Tu; Chad Tang; John W Davis; Louis Pisters; Brian F Chapin Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2021-04-06 Impact factor: 14.432
Authors: Catarina Dinis Fernandes; Ghazaleh Ghobadi; Henk G van der Poel; Jeroen de Jong; Stijn W T P J Heijmink; Ivo Schoots; Iris Walraven; Petra J van Houdt; Milena Smolic; Floris J Pos; Uulke A van der Heide Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-11-12 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Jim Zhong; Finbar Slevin; Andrew F Scarsbrook; Maria Serra; Ananya Choudhury; Peter J Hoskin; Sarah Brown; Ann M Henry Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2021-09-09 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Esther Mena; Peter C Black; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Michael Gorin; Mohamad Allaf; Peter Choyke Journal: World J Urol Date: 2020-07-15 Impact factor: 4.226