Literature DB >> 28040212

Pollution pathways and release estimation of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) in central and eastern China.

Zhaoyang Liu1, Yonglong Lu2, Pei Wang3, Tieyu Wang3, Shijie Liu4, Andrew C Johnson5, Andrew J Sweetman6, Yvette Baninla1.   

Abstract

China has gradually become the most important manufacturing and consumption centre for perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) in the world, and inadvertently become the world's major contamination hotspots. However, a systematic analysis of pollution pathways for PFOS/PFOA into the different environmental compartments and their quantification in China has yet to be carried out. This study focused on PFOS and PFOA release into the environment in the central and eastern region of China, which accounts for the vast majority of national emission. About 80-90% of PFOS/PFOA contamination in the Chinese environment was estimated to come directly from manufacturing and industrial sites mostly via wastewater discharge from these facilities. The other major contamination sources for PFOS were identified as being linked to aqueous fire-fighting foams (AFFFs), and pesticides including sulfluramid. For PFOA, following some way behind industrial wastewater, were industrial exhaust gas, domestic wastewater and landfill leachate as contamination sources. For surface water contamination, the major pollution contributors after industrial wastewater were AFFF spill runoff for PFOS, and domestic wastewater and precipitation-runoff for PFOA. The majority of PFOS that contaminated soil was considered to be linked with infiltration of AFFF and pesticides, while most PFOA in soil was attributed to atmospheric deposition and landfill leachate. Where groundwater had become contaminated, surface water seepage was estimated to contribute about 50% of PFOS and 40% of PFOA while the remainder was mostly derived from soil leaching. A review of the available monitoring data for PFOS/PFOA in the literature supported the view that industrial wastewater, landfill leachate and AFFF application were the dominant sources. Higher concentrations of PFOA than PFOS found in precipitation also corroborated the prediction of more PFOA release into air. To reduce PFOS/PFOA contamination of the Chinese environment the focus for control should be on industrial wastewater emissions.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Environmental release; Environmental risk; Major sources; PFOA; PFOS; Transport pathway

Year:  2016        PMID: 28040212     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  6 in total

1.  Occurrence and distribution of perfluorooctane sulfonate and perfluorooctanoic acid in three major rivers of Xinjiang, China.

Authors:  Gehui Wang; Xiaolong Wang; Zhenni Xing; Jianjiang Lu; Qigang Chang; Yanbin Tong
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Biomarker responses of earthworms (Eisenia fetida) to soils contaminated with perfluorooctanoic acid.

Authors:  Yiyi Zhao; Guangde Li; Daqian Qi; Liangqi Sun; Changlei Wen; Suzhen Yin
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Occurrence, Distribution, and Risk Assessment of Perfluoroalkyl Acids (PFAAs) in Muscle and Liver of Cattle in Xinjiang, China.

Authors:  Gehui Wang; Jianjiang Lu; Zhenni Xing; Shanman Li; Zilong Liu; Yanbin Tong
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Dietary Habits Related to Food Packaging and Population Exposure to PFASs.

Authors:  Herbert P Susmann; Laurel A Schaider; Kathryn M Rodgers; Ruthann A Rudel
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Anthropogenic Drivers of Variation in Concentrations of Perfluoroalkyl Substances in Otters (Lutra lutra) from England and Wales.

Authors:  Emily O'Rourke; Juliet Hynes; Sara Losada; Jonathan L Barber; M Glória Pereira; Eleanor F Kean; Frank Hailer; Elizabeth A Chadwick
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Monthly Variations in Perfluorinated Compound Concentrations in Groundwater.

Authors:  Megan Steele; Converse Griffith; Christin Duran
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2018-09-14
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.