Literature DB >> 28040126

Prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus at first trimester in low-risk pregnancies.

Pınar Kumru1, Resul Arisoy2, Emre Erdogdu1, Oya Demirci1, Mustecep Kavrut3, Cem Ardıc1, Nihan Aslaner1, Aysen Ozkoral4, Aktug Ertekin1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the relationship among the sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), homeostasis model assessment (HOMA), glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and cholesterol panel values to predict subsequent gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in low-risk pregnancies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight pregnant women with GDM and 295 low-risk pregnant women without GDM were included in this study. Maternal blood samples were obtained during the first trimester examination to determine the SHBG, HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, insulin, thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxine, total cholesterol, triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. The variables that exhibited statistically significant differences between the groups and independent predictors for GDM were examined using logistic regression analysis. The risk of developing GDM, according to cutoff values, was determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
RESULTS: The SHBG, HOMA, LDL, and TG levels were found to be the significant independent markers for GDM [adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 0.991; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.986-995; OR = 1.56; 95% CI, 1.24-1.98; OR = 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.04; and OR = 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.02, respectively]. The HbA1c, body mass index, and mean arterial pressure values were nonindependent predictors of GDM. The areas under the ROC curve used to determine the predictive accuracy of SHBG, HOMA, TG, and LDL-C for development of GDM were 0.73, 0.75, 0.70, and 0.72, respectively. For a false positive rate of 5% for the prediction of GDM, the values of the sensitivities were 21.1, 26.3, 21.1, and 18.4%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The HOMA, SHBG, TG, and LDL-C levels are independent predictors for subsequent development of GDM in low-risk pregnancies, but they exhibit low sensitivity.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gestational diabetes mellitus; low-risk pregnancy; prediction; screening

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28040126     DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2016.04.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 1028-4559            Impact factor:   1.705


  10 in total

1.  Comparison of Machine Learning Methods and Conventional Logistic Regressions for Predicting Gestational Diabetes Using Routine Clinical Data: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Yunzhen Ye; Yu Xiong; Qiongjie Zhou; Jiangnan Wu; Xiaotian Li; Xirong Xiao
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 4.011

2.  Serum magnesium and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein as a predictor for gestational diabetes mellitus in Sudanese pregnant women.

Authors:  Warda Naser; Ishag Adam; Duria A Rayis; Mohammed A Ahmed; Hamdan Z Hamdan
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  The joint prediction model of pBMI and eFBG in predicting gestational diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Ying Pan; Ji Hu; Shao Zhong
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2019-12-25       Impact factor: 1.671

4.  Metabolic syndrome markers and risk of hyperglycemia in pregnancy: a cross-sectional cohort study.

Authors:  Joice M Vernini; Bianca F Nicolosi; Mariana A Arantes; Roberto A Costa; Claudia G Magalhães; José E Corrente; Silvana A M Lima; Marilza V Rudge; Iracema M Calderon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Higher Peripheral Cholesterol and a Positive Correlation With Risk for Large-For-Gestational-Age Neonates in Pre-Pregnancy Underweight Women.

Authors:  Dongyu Wang; Wenjing Ding; Chengcheng Ding; Haitian Chen; Weihua Zhao; Bo Sun; Zilian Wang
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 5.555

6.  Maternal metabolic factors and the association with gestational diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nahal Habibi; Aya Mousa; Chau Thien Tay; Mahnaz Bahri Khomami; Rhiannon K Patten; Prabha H Andraweera; Molla Wassie; Jared Vandersluys; Ali Aflatounian; Tina Bianco-Miotto; Shao J Zhou; Jessica A Grieger
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Res Rev       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 8.128

7.  The Potential Role of Chemerin, Lipocalin 2, and Apelin in the Diagnosis and Pathophysiology of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Radzisław Mierzyński; Elżbieta Poniedziałek-Czajkowska; Dominik Dłuski; Maciej Kamiński; Agnieszka Mierzyńska; Bożena Leszczyńska-Gorzelak
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.011

8.  Weight Loss Prior to Pregnancy and Early Gestational Glycemia: Prepare, a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Erin S LeBlanc; Ning X Smith; Kimberly K Vesco; Teresa A Hillier; Victor J Stevens
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 6.134

9.  Sex Hormone-binding Globulin, Cardiometabolic Biomarkers, and Gestational Diabetes: A Longitudinal Study and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Meng-Ying Li; Shristi Rawal; Stefanie N Hinkle; Ye-Yi Zhu; Fasil Tekola-Ayele; Michael Y Tsai; Si-Min Liu; Cui-Lin Zhang
Journal:  Matern Fetal Med       Date:  2020-01-24

10.  Lipid Metabolism Is Dysregulated before, during and after Pregnancy in a Mouse Model of Gestational Diabetes.

Authors:  Samuel Furse; Denise S Fernandez-Twinn; Davide Chiarugi; Albert Koulman; Susan E Ozanne
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 5.923

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.