Literature DB >> 28039996

Head orientation benefit to speech intelligibility in noise for cochlear implant users and in realistic listening conditions.

Jacques A Grange1, John F Culling1.   

Abstract

Cochlear implant (CI) users suffer from elevated speech-reception thresholds and may rely on lip reading. Traditional measures of spatial release from masking quantify speech-reception-threshold improvement with azimuthal separation of target speaker and interferers and with the listener facing the target speaker. Substantial benefits of orienting the head away from the target speaker were predicted by a model of spatial release from masking. Audio-only and audio-visual speech-reception thresholds in normal-hearing (NH) listeners and bilateral and unilateral CI users confirmed model predictions of this head-orientation benefit. The benefit ranged 2-5 dB for a modest 30° orientation that did not affect the lip-reading benefit. NH listeners' and CI users' lip-reading benefit measured 3 and 5 dB, respectively. A head-orientation benefit of ∼2 dB was also both predicted and observed in NH listeners in realistic simulations of a restaurant listening environment. Exploiting the benefit of head orientation is thus a robust hearing tactic that would benefit both NH listeners and CI users in noisy listening conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28039996     DOI: 10.1121/1.4968515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Contralateral Interference Caused by Binaurally Presented Competing Speech in Adult Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Olga A Stakhovskaya; Joshua G W Bernstein
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Binaural Optimization of Cochlear Implants: Discarding Frequency Content Without Sacrificing Head-Shadow Benefit.

Authors:  Sterling W Sheffield; Matthew J Goupell; Nathaniel J Spencer; Olga A Stakhovskaya; Joshua G W Bernstein
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Simulations of the effect of unlinked cochlear-implant automatic gain control and head movement on interaural level differences.

Authors:  Alan W Archer-Boyd; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The minimum monitoring signal-to-noise ratio for off-axis signals and its implications for directional hearing aids.

Authors:  Alan W Archer-Boyd; Jack A Holman; W Owen Brimijoin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Spatial Speech-in-Noise Performance in Bimodal and Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Ben Williges; Thomas Wesarg; Lorenz Jung; Leontien I Geven; Andreas Radeloff; Tim Jürgens
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

6.  Novel Approaches to Measure Spatial Release From Masking in Children With Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Z Ellen Peng; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.562

7.  Turn an Ear to Hear: How Hearing-Impaired Listeners Can Exploit Head Orientation to Enhance Their Speech Intelligibility in Noisy Social Settings.

Authors:  Jacques A Grange; John F Culling; Barry Bardsley; Laura I Mackinney; Sarah E Hughes; Steven S Backhouse
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  On the Interaction of Head and Gaze Control With Acoustic Beam Width of a Simulated Beamformer in a Two-Talker Scenario.

Authors:  Ĺuboš Hládek; Bernd Porr; Graham Naylor; Thomas Lunner; W Owen Brimijoin
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.