Literature DB >> 28039758

Neoadjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer: Challenges and uncertainties.

Mick Van de Wiel1, Yanina Dockx2, Tim Van den Wyngaert3, Sigrid Stroobants3, Wiebren A A Tjalma4, Manon T Huizing1.   

Abstract

The management of locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) remains a major clinical issue, despite progress achieved in diagnosis and therapy. Preoperative or neoadjuvant therapy has gained interest since breast cancer has been regarded as a systemic disease. Comparing adjuvant versus neoadjuvant treatment, the neoadjuvant approach offers the advantage of downstaging the disease and testing the efficacy of therapy administered to patients. A large number of clinical trials have attempted to define the optimal neoadjuvant treatment, but little attention has been paid to the sequence of chemotherapy. Moreover, the integration of antibodies against Human Epidermal Receptor-2 (HER-2) and other biological therapies that may improve the long-term control of breast cancer patients, have a special clinical interest. In this review, we will discuss these topics attempting to answer the questions why, when and which regimen to use for patients with LABC. Especially, the introduction of the platina derivatives in neoadjuvant trials with their exceptional high pathological complete response rates are challenging to rethink the optimal treatment options in early and locally advanced breast cancer.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biology; Breast cancer; Chemotherapy; HER-2; Neoadjuvant therapy; Survival; Targeted; Therapy; Treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28039758     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.12.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  6 in total

1.  Improving breast cancer sensitivity to paclitaxel by increasing aneuploidy.

Authors:  Sylvie Rodrigues-Ferreira; Anne Nehlig; Hadia Moindjie; Clarisse Monchecourt; Cynthia Seiler; Elisabetta Marangoni; Sophie Chateau-Joubert; Marie-Eglantine Dujaric; Nicolas Servant; Bernard Asselain; Patricia de Cremoux; Magali Lacroix-Triki; Monica Arnedos; Jean-Yves Pierga; Fabrice André; Clara Nahmias
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The effect of training interventions on physical performance, quality of life, and fatigue in patients receiving breast cancer treatment: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nick Gebruers; Melissa Camberlin; Fleur Theunissen; Wiebren Tjalma; Hanne Verbelen; Timia Van Soom; Eric van Breda
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Engagement in an Interactive App for Symptom Self-Management during Treatment in Patients With Breast or Prostate Cancer: Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Marie-Therése Crafoord; Maria Fjell; Kay Sundberg; Marie Nilsson; Ann Langius-Eklöf
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  Quantification of Ki67 Change as a Valid Prognostic Indicator of Luminal B Type Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Therapy.

Authors:  Shirong Tan; Xin Fu; Shouping Xu; Pengfei Qiu; Zhidong Lv; Yingying Xu; Qiang Zhang
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 3.201

5.  Data-Driven Discovery of Mathematical and Physical Relations in Oncology Data Using Human-Understandable Machine Learning.

Authors:  Daria Kurz; Carlos Salort Sánchez; Cristian Axenie
Journal:  Front Artif Intell       Date:  2021-11-25

Review 6.  Nanomedicine applications in the treatment of breast cancer: current state of the art.

Authors:  Di Wu; Mengjie Si; Hui-Yi Xue; Ho-Lun Wong
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2017-08-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.