Literature DB >> 28038961

Determinants of gentamicin concentrations in critically ill patients: a population pharmacokinetic analysis.

Caspar J Hodiamont1, Nicole P Juffermans2, Catherine S C Bouman2, Menno D de Jong3, Ron A A Mathôt4, Reinier M van Hest4.   

Abstract

When treating critically ill patients with gentamicin for severe infection, peak concentrations (Cmax) determine clinical efficacy and trough concentrations (Cmin) determine toxicity. Despite administration of body weight-standardised starting doses, a wide range of Cmax is generally observed. Furthermore, in therapeutic drug monitoring, several measures of renal function are used to predict appropriate Cmin and gentamicin dosing intervals, but the most accurate predictor is not known. This study aimed to quantify the impact of several patient parameters on gentamicin Cmax values and to determine which measure of renal function best predicts gentamicin clearance (CL). Clinical data and serum gentamicin levels were retrospectively collected from all critically ill patients treated with gentamicin at our intensive care unit between 1 January and 30 June 2011. Data were analysed using non-linear mixed-effects modelling (NONMEM v.7.1.2). A two-compartmental model was developed based on 303 gentamicin concentration-time data from 44 critically ill patients. Serum albumin levels explained 25% of interindividual variability in the volume of distribution (Vd). Creatinine clearance calculated from the creatinine concentration in a 6-h urine portion (CalcCLCr) resulted in acceptable estimation of gentamicin CL, whilst serum creatinine (SCr) and creatinine clearance estimated by the Cockcroft-Gault formula (CGCLCr) overestimated gentamicin CL and therefore underestimated Cmin. In conclusion, low albumin concentrations resulted in a larger Vd and lower Cmax of gentamicin. These results suggest that use of a higher gentamicin starting dose in critically ill patients with hypoalbuminaemia may prevent underdosing. Urinary CalcCLCr is a better predictor of Cmin than SCr or CGCLCr.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. and International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Critical illness; Gentamicin; Hypoalbuminaemia; Population pharmacokinetics; Renal function

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28038961     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.10.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents        ISSN: 0924-8579            Impact factor:   5.283


  10 in total

1.  Monitoring of gentamicin serum concentrations in obstetrics and gynaecology patients in Namibia.

Authors:  Bonifasius S Singu; Mwangana Mubita; Moses M Thikukutu; Josef K Mufenda; Shonag B McKenzie; Roger K Verbeeck
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2018-03-28

2.  Risk Factors Associated with Suboptimal Tobramycin Levels in the Medical Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Jacob P Counts; Jessica L Elefritz; Erica E Reed; Marilly Palettas; Connor Aossey; Julia J Beatty
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 2.441

3.  Population Pharmacokinetics and Dosing Optimization of Gentamicin in Critically Ill Patients Undergoing Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy.

Authors:  Sha He; Zeneng Cheng; Feifan Xie
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 4.162

Review 4.  Aminoglycosides in the Intensive Care Unit: What Is New in Population PK Modeling?

Authors:  Alexandre Duong; Chantale Simard; Yi Le Wang; David Williamson; Amélie Marsot
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-29

5.  Model Re-Estimation: An Alternative for Poor Predictive Performance during External Evaluations? Example of Gentamicin in Critically Ill Patients.

Authors:  Alexandre Duong; Chantale Simard; David Williamson; Amélie Marsot
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 6.525

Review 6.  Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Gentamicin in Various Patient Populations and Consequences for Optimal Dosing for Gram-Negative Infections: An Updated Review.

Authors:  Caspar J Hodiamont; Annemieke K van den Broek; Suzanne L de Vroom; Jan M Prins; Ron A A Mathôt; Reinier M van Hest
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 5.577

7.  The Synergistic Activity and Optimizing Doses of Tigecycline in Combination with Aminoglycosides against Clinical Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates.

Authors:  Parnrada Nulsopapon; Worapong Nasomsong; Manat Pongchaidecha; Dhitiwat Changpradub; Piraporn Juntanawiwat; Wichai Santimaleeworagun
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-17

Review 8.  Antibiotic selection in the treatment of acute invasive infections by Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Guidelines by the Spanish Society of Chemotherapy.

Authors:  J Mensa; J Barberán; A Soriano; P Llinares; F Marco; R Cantón; G Bou; J González Del Castillo; E Maseda; J R Azanza; J Pasquau; C García-Vidal; J M Reguera; D Sousa; J Gómez; M Montejo; M Borges; A Torres; F Alvarez-Lerma; M Salavert; R Zaragoza; A Oliver
Journal:  Rev Esp Quimioter       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 1.553

9.  Dose recommendations for gentamicin in the real-world obese population with varying body weight and renal (dys)function.

Authors:  Cornelis Smit; Anne M van Schip; Eric P A van Dongen; Roger J M Brüggemann; Matthijs L Becker; Catherijne A J Knibbe
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 5.790

10.  Impact of a vancomycin loading dose on the achievement of target vancomycin exposure in the first 24 h and on the accompanying risk of nephrotoxicity in critically ill patients.

Authors:  C J Hodiamont; N P Juffermans; S E Berends; D J van Vessem; N Hakkens; R A A Mathôt; M D de Jong; R M van Hest
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 5.790

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.