Literature DB >> 28038862

Survival after associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) for advanced colorectal liver metastases: A case-matched comparison with palliative systemic therapy.

Pim B Olthof1, Joost Huiskens2, Dennis A Wicherts2, Pablo E Huespe3, Victoria Ardiles3, Ricardo Robles-Campos4, René Adam5, Michael Linecker6, Pierre-Alain Clavien6, Miriam Koopman7, Cornelis Verhoef8, Cornelis J A Punt9, Thomas M van Gulik2, Eduardo de Santibanes3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) allows the resection of colorectal liver metastases with curative intent which would otherwise be unresectable and only eligible for palliative systemic therapy. This study aimed to compare outcomes of ALPPS in patients with otherwise unresectable colorectal liver metastases with matched historic controls treated with palliative systemic treatment.
METHODS: All patients with colorectal liver metastases from the international ALPPS registry were identified and analyzed. Survival data were compared according to the extent of disease. Otherwise unresectable ALPPS patients were defined by at least 2 of the following criteria: ≥6 metastasis, ≥2 future remnant liver metastasis, ≥6 involved segments excluding segment 1. These patients were matched with patients included in 2, phase 3, metastatic, colorectal cancer trials (CAIRO and CAIRO2) using propensity scoring in order to compare survival.
RESULTS: Of 295 patients with colorectal liver metastases in the ALPPS registry, 70 patients had otherwise unresectable disease defined by the proposed criteria. Two-year overall survival was 49% and 72% for patients with ≥2 and <2 criteria, respectively (P = .002). Median disease-free survival was 6 months compared to 12 months (P < .001) in the ≥2 and <2 criteria groups, respectively. Median overall survival was comparable between ALPPS patients with ≥2 criteria and case-matched patients who received palliative treatment (24.0 vs 17.6 months, P = .088).
CONCLUSION: Early oncologic outcomes of patients with advanced liver metastases undergoing ALPPS were not superior to results of matched patients receiving systemic treatment with palliative intent. Careful patient selection is essential in order to improve outcomes.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28038862     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.10.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  11 in total

1.  Long-Term Outcome After Conventional Two-Stage Hepatectomy Versus Tourniquet-ALPPS in Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Authors:  Ricardo Robles-Campos; Roberto Brusadin; Asunción López-Conesa; Víctor López-López; Álvaro Navarro-Barrios; José J López-Espín; Julio Arévalo-Pérez; Pascual Parrilla
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Diagnostic accuracy of 3D imaging combined with intra-operative ultrasound in the prediction of post-hepatectomy liver failure.

Authors:  Tianchong Wu; Wenhao Huang; Baochun He; Yuehua Guo; Gongzhe Peng; Mingyue Li; Shiyun Bao
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2022-06

Review 3.  Role of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation in staged hepatectomy (ALPPS)-strategy for colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Arezou Abbasi; Amir A Rahnemai-Azar; Katiuscha Merath; Sharon M Weber; Daniel E Abbott; Mary Dillhoff; Jordan Cloyd; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-09-17

4.  Monosegment ALPPS hepatectomy preserving segment 4 for colorectal liver metastases: literature review and our experience.

Authors:  Fiammetta Soggiu; Francesco Giovinazzo; Jack Straiton; Giulia Turri; Jim Phillips; Bassam Al-Kari; Irfan Ahmed; Mohammad Habib
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 5.  Uncommon indications for associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Quirino Lai; Gianluca Mennini; Zoe Larghi Laureiro; Massimo Rossi
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 8.265

6.  Maturity of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy-derived liver regeneration in a rat model.

Authors:  Yi-Fan Tong; Ning Meng; Miao-Qin Chen; Han-Ning Ying; Ming Xu; Billy Lu; Jun-Jie Hong; Yi-Fan Wang; Xiu-Jun Cai
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  ALPPS versus two-stage hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases--a comparative retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jan Bednarsch; Zoltan Czigany; Samara Sharmeen; Gregory van der Kroft; Pavel Strnad; Tom Florian Ulmer; Peter Isfort; Philipp Bruners; Georg Lurje; Ulf Peter Neumann
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 2.754

8.  Conversion therapy and suitable timing for subsequent salvage surgery for initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: What is new?

Authors:  Ze-Feng Zhang; Yu-Jun Luo; Quan Lu; Shi-Xue Dai; Wei-Hong Sha
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 1.337

Review 9.  Current status of surgical treatment of colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Feng Xu; Bin Tang; Tian-Qiang Jin; Chao-Liu Dai
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 1.337

Review 10.  Recent advances in treatment for colorectal liver metastasis.

Authors:  Eiji Oki; Koji Ando; Ryota Nakanishi; Masahiko Sugiyama; Yuichiro Nakashima; Nobuhide Kubo; Kensuke Kudou; Hiroshi Saeki; Tadahiro Nozoe; Yasunori Emi; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2018-04-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.