Literature DB >> 28038345

A Bayesian model for estimating multi-state disease progression.

Shiwen Shen1, Simon X Han2, Panayiotis Petousis2, Robert E Weiss3, Frank Meng4, Alex A T Bui4, William Hsu4.   

Abstract

A growing number of individuals who are considered at high risk of cancer are now routinely undergoing population screening. However, noted harms such as radiation exposure, overdiagnosis, and overtreatment underscore the need for better temporal models that predict who should be screened and at what frequency. The mean sojourn time (MST), an average duration period when a tumor can be detected by imaging but with no observable clinical symptoms, is a critical variable for formulating screening policy. Estimation of MST has been long studied using continuous Markov model (CMM) with Maximum likelihood estimation (MLE). However, a lot of traditional methods assume no observation error of the imaging data, which is unlikely and can bias the estimation of the MST. In addition, the MLE may not be stably estimated when data is sparse. Addressing these shortcomings, we present a probabilistic modeling approach for periodic cancer screening data. We first model the cancer state transition using a three state CMM model, while simultaneously considering observation error. We then jointly estimate the MST and observation error within a Bayesian framework. We also consider the inclusion of covariates to estimate individualized rates of disease progression. Our approach is demonstrated on participants who underwent chest x-ray screening in the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) and validated using posterior predictive p-values and Pearson's chi-square test. Our model demonstrates more accurate and sensible estimates of MST in comparison to MLE.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian analysis; Chest x-ray; Lung cancer; Markov chain Monte Carlo; Markov model; Mean sojourn time; Observation error; Posterior predictive p-value; Transition probability

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28038345      PMCID: PMC5508542          DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2016.12.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Biol Med        ISSN: 0010-4825            Impact factor:   4.589


  32 in total

Review 1.  Mean sojourn time and effectiveness of mortality reduction for lung cancer screening with computed tomography.

Authors:  Chun-Ru Chien; Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2008-06-01       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  Lung cancer risk prediction to select smokers for screening CT--a model based on the Italian COSMOS trial.

Authors:  Patrick Maisonneuve; Vincenzo Bagnardi; Massimo Bellomi; Lorenzo Spaggiari; Giuseppe Pelosi; Cristiano Rampinelli; Raffaella Bertolotti; Nicole Rotmensz; John K Field; Andrea Decensi; Giulia Veronesi
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2011-08-02

3.  Multi-state models and diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  G Marshall; R H Jones
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1995-09-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Using Markov Multistate Models to Examine the Progression of Symptom Severity Among an Ambulatory Population of Cancer Patients: Are Certain Symptoms Better Managed Than Others?

Authors:  Jing Jia; Lisa Barbera; Rinku Sutradhar
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 3.612

5.  Lung cancer detectability by test, histology, stage, and gender: estimates from the NLST and the PLCO trials.

Authors:  Kevin Ten Haaf; Joost van Rosmalen; Harry J de Koning
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Estimation of screening sensitivity and sojourn time from an organized screening program.

Authors:  Huan Jiang; S D Walter; P E Brown; A M Chiarelli
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes.

Authors:  S L Zeger; K Y Liang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Validation of a model of lung cancer risk prediction among smokers.

Authors:  Kathleen A Cronin; Mitchell H Gail; Zhaohui Zou; Peter B Bach; Jarmo Virtamo; Demetrius Albanes
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Differences in lung cancer risk between men and women: examination of the evidence.

Authors:  E A Zang; E L Wynder
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1996-02-21       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Comparing clinical attachment level and pocket depth for predicting periodontal disease progression in healthy sites of patients with chronic periodontitis using multi-state Markov models.

Authors:  Ibrahimu Mdala; Ingar Olsen; Anne D Haffajee; Sigmund S Socransky; Magne Thoresen; Birgitte Freiesleben de Blasio
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 8.728

View more
  3 in total

1.  A Machine Learning Approach to Classifying Self-Reported Health Status in a Cohort of Patients With Heart Disease Using Activity Tracker Data.

Authors:  Yiwen Meng; William Speier; Chrisandra Shufelt; Sandy Joung; Jennifer E Van Eyk; C Noel Bairey Merz; Mayra Lopez; Brennan Spiegel; Corey W Arnold
Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 5.772

2.  Quantifying the duration of the preclinical detectable phase in cancer screening: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sandra M E Geurts; Anne M W M Aarts; André L M Verbeek; Tony H H Chen; Mireille J M Broeders; Stephen W Duffy
Journal:  Epidemiol Health       Date:  2022-01-03

3.  Moth-Flame Optimization for Early Prediction of Heart Diseases.

Authors:  S Haseena; S Kavi Priya; S Saroja; R Madavan; M Muhibbullah; Umashankar Subramaniam
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 2.809

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.