| Literature DB >> 28038345 |
Shiwen Shen1, Simon X Han2, Panayiotis Petousis2, Robert E Weiss3, Frank Meng4, Alex A T Bui4, William Hsu4.
Abstract
A growing number of individuals who are considered at high risk of cancer are now routinely undergoing population screening. However, noted harms such as radiation exposure, overdiagnosis, and overtreatment underscore the need for better temporal models that predict who should be screened and at what frequency. The mean sojourn time (MST), an average duration period when a tumor can be detected by imaging but with no observable clinical symptoms, is a critical variable for formulating screening policy. Estimation of MST has been long studied using continuous Markov model (CMM) with Maximum likelihood estimation (MLE). However, a lot of traditional methods assume no observation error of the imaging data, which is unlikely and can bias the estimation of the MST. In addition, the MLE may not be stably estimated when data is sparse. Addressing these shortcomings, we present a probabilistic modeling approach for periodic cancer screening data. We first model the cancer state transition using a three state CMM model, while simultaneously considering observation error. We then jointly estimate the MST and observation error within a Bayesian framework. We also consider the inclusion of covariates to estimate individualized rates of disease progression. Our approach is demonstrated on participants who underwent chest x-ray screening in the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) and validated using posterior predictive p-values and Pearson's chi-square test. Our model demonstrates more accurate and sensible estimates of MST in comparison to MLE.Entities:
Keywords: Bayesian analysis; Chest x-ray; Lung cancer; Markov chain Monte Carlo; Markov model; Mean sojourn time; Observation error; Posterior predictive p-value; Transition probability
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28038345 PMCID: PMC5508542 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2016.12.011
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Biol Med ISSN: 0010-4825 Impact factor: 4.589