Literature DB >> 28038316

Association of the Female Athlete Triad Risk Assessment Stratification to the Development of Bone Stress Injuries in Collegiate Athletes.

Adam S Tenforde1, Jennifer L Carlson2, Audrey Chang3, Kristin L Sainani4, Rebecca Shultz5, Jae Hyung Kim6, Phil Cutti5, Neville H Golden2, Michael Fredericson6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The female athlete triad (referred to as the triad) contributes to adverse health outcomes, including bone stress injuries (BSIs), in female athletes. Guidelines were published in 2014 for clinical management of athletes affected by the triad.
PURPOSE: This study aimed to (1) classify athletes from a collegiate population of 16 sports into low-, moderate-, and high-risk categories using the Female Athlete Triad Cumulative Risk Assessment score and (2) evaluate the predictive value of the risk categories for subsequent BSIs. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS: A total of 323 athletes completed both electronic preparticipation physical examination and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scans. Of these, 239 athletes with known oligomenorrhea/amenorrhea status were assigned to a low-, moderate-, or high-risk category. Chart review was used to identify athletes who sustained a subsequent BSI during collegiate sports participation; the injury required a physician diagnosis and imaging confirmation.
RESULTS: Of 239 athletes, 61 (25.5%) were classified into moderate-risk and 9 (3.8%) into high-risk categories. Sports with the highest proportion of athletes assigned to the moderate- and high-risk categories included gymnastics (56.3%), lacrosse (50%), cross-country (48.9%), swimming/diving (42.9%), sailing (33%), and volleyball (33%). Twenty-five athletes (10.5%) assigned to risk categories sustained ≥1 BSI. Cross-country runners contributed the majority of BSIs (16; 64%). After adjusting for age and participation in cross-country, we found that moderate-risk athletes were twice as likely as low-risk athletes to sustain a BSI (risk ratio [RR], 2.6; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.3-5.5) and high-risk athletes were nearly 4 times as likely (RR, 3.8; 95% CI, 1.8-8.0). When examining the 6 individual components of the triad risk assessment score, both the oligomenorrhea/amenorrhea score ( P = .0069) and the prior stress fracture/reaction score ( P = .0315) were identified as independent predictors for subsequent BSIs (after adjusting for cross-country participation and age).
CONCLUSION: Using published guidelines, 29% of female collegiate athletes in this study were classified into moderate- or high-risk categories using the Female Athlete Triad Cumulative Risk Assessment Score. Moderate- and high-risk athletes were more likely to subsequently sustain a BSI; most BSIs were sustained by cross-country runners.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gymnastics; lacrosse; running; stress fractures; female athlete; swimming

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28038316     DOI: 10.1177/0363546516676262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  33 in total

1.  Bone mineral density, energy availability, and dietary restraint in collegiate cross-country runners and non-running controls.

Authors:  William P McCormack; Todd C Shoepe; Joseph LaBrie; Hawley C Almstedt
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  Female Athlete Triad: Future Directions for Energy Availability and Eating Disorder Research and Practice.

Authors:  Nancy I Williams; Siobhan M Statuta; Ashley Austin
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 2.182

Review 3.  Bone stress injuries.

Authors:  Tim Hoenig; Kathryn E Ackerman; Belinda R Beck; Mary L Bouxsein; David B Burr; Karsten Hollander; Kristin L Popp; Tim Rolvien; Adam S Tenforde; Stuart J Warden
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 52.329

Review 4.  Rib Fractures in Professional Baseball Pitchers: Mechanics, Epidemiology, and Management.

Authors:  Sean Schowalter; Bryan Le; James Creps; Kelly C McInnis
Journal:  Open Access J Sports Med       Date:  2022-10-10

Review 5.  Sex Differences in Common Sports Injuries.

Authors:  Cindy Y Lin; Ellen Casey; Daniel C Herman; Nicole Katz; Adam S Tenforde
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 6.  Overtraining Syndrome (OTS) and Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (RED-S): Shared Pathways, Symptoms and Complexities.

Authors:  Trent Stellingwerff; Ida A Heikura; Romain Meeusen; Stéphane Bermon; Stephen Seiler; Margo L Mountjoy; Louise M Burke
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 7.  Epidemiology of Injuries in Women Playing Competitive Team Bat-or-Stick Sports: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Nirmala Kanthi Panagodage Perera; Corey Joseph; Joanne Lyn Kemp; Caroline Frances Finch
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Physiological Factors of Female Runners With and Without Stress Fracture Histories: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Therese E Johnston; Colleen Dempsey; Frances Gilman; Ryan Tomlinson; Ann-Katrin Jacketti; Jeremy Close
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 3.843

9.  Epidemiology of NCAA Bone Stress Injuries: A Comparison of Athletes in Divisions I, II, and III.

Authors:  Andrew Bratsman; Audrey Wassef; Christina R Wassef; Prathap Jayaram; J Bruce Mosely; Theodore B Shybut
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-07-09

10.  Epidemiology of Injuries in National Collegiate Athletic Association Women's Cross-Country: 2014-2015 Through 2018-2019.

Authors:  Avinash Chandran; Sarah N Morris; Adrian J Boltz; Hannah J Robison; Christy L Collins
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.824

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.