| Literature DB >> 28036355 |
Yan Sun1,2, Liang-Huan Wu1,2, Xiao-Yan Li1,2.
Abstract
Analyzing variations inEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28036355 PMCID: PMC5201238 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168970
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Biomass and measured Si uptake by rice grown with external supply of Si at 0.17 mM, 1.70mM and 8.50mM.
Means marked with different letters denote a significant difference at P < 0.05.
Intra-plant fractionation Δ30Si (‰) in rice seedlings for each Si supply (mM) and 30ε between the bulked plant δ30Siplant (‰) and the source δ30Sisource (‰).
| Δ30Si | 30ε | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| δ30Siaboveground | δ30Siroot | Δ30Siaboveground-root | δ30Siplant | δ30Sisource | δ30Sisolution | 30εplant-source | |
| ‰ | ‰ | ‰ ± σD | ‰ | ‰ | ‰ | ‰ ± σD | |
| 8.50 mM | -1.08 ± 0.04c | 0.19 ± 0.06a | -1.27 ± 0.10c | -1.03 ± 0.09c | 0.10 | 0.50 ± 0.04a | -1.13 ± 0.09c |
| 1.70 mM | -0.78 ± 0.15b | 0.15 ± 0.09ab | -0.94 ± 0.24b | -0.75 ± 0.07b | 0.10 | 0.35 ± 0.02b | -0.85 ± 0.07b |
| 0.17 mM | -0.31 ± 0.06a | 0.03 ± 0.08b | -0.34 ± 0.11a | -0.30 ± 0.05a | 0.10 | -0.36 ± 0.02c | -0.40 ± 0.05a |
| Average | -0.72 ± 0.05 | 0.12 ± 0.02 | -0.84 ± 0.07 | -0.69 ± 0.07 | 0.10 | 0.16 ± 0.03 | -0.79 ± 0.07 |
Data are expressed as means ± SD (n = 4). δ30Sisolution (‰) are expressed as the δ30Si values of nutrient solution after Si uptake by plants.
Fig 2Measured Si uptake and Si isotope composition in rice seedlings treated with low temperature and inhibitors.
Means marked with different letters denote a significant difference at P <0.05. LT-low temperature, RT-room temperature.
Si concentration and δ30Si values of solution and whole rice plant treated with low temperature and inhibitors.
| Treatment | Si concentration | δ30Sisource | δ30Sisolution | δ30Siplant | Δ30Siaboveground-root | 30εplant-solution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mM | ‰ | ‰ | ‰ | ‰ ± σD | ‰ ± σD | |
| Source nutrient solution | 0.17a | 0.06 | - | - | - | - |
| Low-temperature (6h) | 0.16 ± 0.002a | 0.06 | 0.14 ± 0.02a | -0.06 ± 0.04a | -0.04 ± 0.04a | -0.20 ± 0.04a |
| Room temperature (6h) | 0.13 ± 0.010c | 0.06 | -0.23 ± 0.04b | -0.15 ± 0.03b | -0.23 ± 0.06b | 0.08 ± 0.03b |
| Inhibitor (6h) NaF | 0.16 ± 0.004a | 0.06 | 0.15 ± 0.02a | -0.06 ± 0.03a | -0.03 ± 0.03a | -0.21 ± 0.03a |
| 2, 4-DNP | 0.16 ± 0.005a | 0.06 | 0.14 ± 0.03a | -0.07 ± 0.04a | -0.05 ± 0.05a | -0.21 ± 0.04a |
| CK | 0.14 ± 0.005b | 0.06 | -0.20 ± 0.03ab | -0.13 ± 0.04ab | -0.21 ± 0.08b | 0.07 ± 0.04ab |
Data are expressed as means ± SD (n = 6). δ30Sisolution (‰) are expressed as the δ30Si values of nutrient solution after Si uptake by plants.
Si isotope compositions of different plants.
| Plant | δ30Siplant | δ30Sisource | 30εplant-source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ‰ | ‰ | ‰ ± σD | ||
| Ziegler et al. (2005) | Corn, Wheat | -1.20 | -0.19 | -1.00 ± 0.31 |
| Opfergelt et al. (2006) | Banana | -0.66 | 0.12 | -0.77 ± 0.21 |
| Ding et al. (2005) | Rice | -0.02 | 1.00 | -1.02 ± 0.33 |
| This study | Rice | -0.69 | 0.10 | -0.79 ± 0.07 |
δ29Si data were conver to δ30Si by a division factor of 1.93.
aHydroponics.