| Literature DB >> 28036355 |
Yan Sun1,2, Liang-Huan Wu1,2, Xiao-Yan Li1,2.
Abstract
Analyzing variations in silicon (Si) isotopes can help elucidate the biogeochemical Si cycle and Si accumulation processes of higher plants. Importantly, the composition of Si isotopes in higher plants has yet to be studied comprehensively and our knowledge of the distribution of Si isotopes in higher plants lags behind that of Si isotopes in marine organisms, such as diatoms. In the present study, we investigated the isotope fractionation that occurs during the uptake and transport of Si in rice, using a series of hydroponic experiments with different external concentrations of Si. We found that an active mechanism was responsible for the majority of Si uptake and transport at lower Si levels and that the uptake of Si by rice roots was significantly suppressed by both low temperature and metabolic inhibitors. In addition, light Si isotopes (28Si) entered roots more readily than heavy Si isotopes (30Si) when the active mechanism was inhibited. Therefore, we conclude that biologically mediated isotope fractionation occurs during the uptake of Si by rice roots. In addition, both active and passive Si uptake components co-exist in rice, and the fractionation effect is enhanced when more Si is absorbed by plants.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28036355 PMCID: PMC5201238 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168970
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Biomass and measured Si uptake by rice grown with external supply of Si at 0.17 mM, 1.70mM and 8.50mM.
Means marked with different letters denote a significant difference at P < 0.05.
Intra-plant fractionation Δ30Si (‰) in rice seedlings for each Si supply (mM) and 30ε between the bulked plant δ30Siplant (‰) and the source δ30Sisource (‰).
| Δ30Si | 30ε | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| δ30Siaboveground | δ30Siroot | Δ30Siaboveground-root | δ30Siplant | δ30Sisource | δ30Sisolution | 30εplant-source | |
| ‰ | ‰ | ‰ ± σD | ‰ | ‰ | ‰ | ‰ ± σD | |
| 8.50 mM | -1.08 ± 0.04c | 0.19 ± 0.06a | -1.27 ± 0.10c | -1.03 ± 0.09c | 0.10 | 0.50 ± 0.04a | -1.13 ± 0.09c |
| 1.70 mM | -0.78 ± 0.15b | 0.15 ± 0.09ab | -0.94 ± 0.24b | -0.75 ± 0.07b | 0.10 | 0.35 ± 0.02b | -0.85 ± 0.07b |
| 0.17 mM | -0.31 ± 0.06a | 0.03 ± 0.08b | -0.34 ± 0.11a | -0.30 ± 0.05a | 0.10 | -0.36 ± 0.02c | -0.40 ± 0.05a |
| Average | -0.72 ± 0.05 | 0.12 ± 0.02 | -0.84 ± 0.07 | -0.69 ± 0.07 | 0.10 | 0.16 ± 0.03 | -0.79 ± 0.07 |
Data are expressed as means ± SD (n = 4). δ30Sisolution (‰) are expressed as the δ30Si values of nutrient solution after Si uptake by plants.
Fig 2Measured Si uptake and Si isotope composition in rice seedlings treated with low temperature and inhibitors.
Means marked with different letters denote a significant difference at P <0.05. LT-low temperature, RT-room temperature.
Si concentration and δ30Si values of solution and whole rice plant treated with low temperature and inhibitors.
| Treatment | Si concentration | δ30Sisource | δ30Sisolution | δ30Siplant | Δ30Siaboveground-root | 30εplant-solution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mM | ‰ | ‰ | ‰ | ‰ ± σD | ‰ ± σD | |
| Source nutrient solution | 0.17a | 0.06 | - | - | - | - |
| Low-temperature (6h) | 0.16 ± 0.002a | 0.06 | 0.14 ± 0.02a | -0.06 ± 0.04a | -0.04 ± 0.04a | -0.20 ± 0.04a |
| Room temperature (6h) | 0.13 ± 0.010c | 0.06 | -0.23 ± 0.04b | -0.15 ± 0.03b | -0.23 ± 0.06b | 0.08 ± 0.03b |
| Inhibitor (6h) NaF | 0.16 ± 0.004a | 0.06 | 0.15 ± 0.02a | -0.06 ± 0.03a | -0.03 ± 0.03a | -0.21 ± 0.03a |
| 2, 4-DNP | 0.16 ± 0.005a | 0.06 | 0.14 ± 0.03a | -0.07 ± 0.04a | -0.05 ± 0.05a | -0.21 ± 0.04a |
| CK | 0.14 ± 0.005b | 0.06 | -0.20 ± 0.03ab | -0.13 ± 0.04ab | -0.21 ± 0.08b | 0.07 ± 0.04ab |
Data are expressed as means ± SD (n = 6). δ30Sisolution (‰) are expressed as the δ30Si values of nutrient solution after Si uptake by plants.
Si isotope compositions of different plants.
| Plant | δ30Siplant | δ30Sisource | 30εplant-source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ‰ | ‰ | ‰ ± σD | ||
| Ziegler et al. (2005) | Corn, Wheat | -1.20 | -0.19 | -1.00 ± 0.31 |
| Opfergelt et al. (2006) | Banana | -0.66 | 0.12 | -0.77 ± 0.21 |
| Ding et al. (2005) | Rice | -0.02 | 1.00 | -1.02 ± 0.33 |
| This study | Rice | -0.69 | 0.10 | -0.79 ± 0.07 |
δ29Si data were conver to δ30Si by a division factor of 1.93.
aHydroponics.