| Literature DB >> 28036029 |
Luz Ibarra-Lara1, María Sánchez-Aguilar2, Alicia Sánchez-Mendoza3, Leonardo Del Valle-Mondragón4, Elizabeth Soria-Castro5, Elizabeth Carreón-Torres6, Eulises Díaz-Díaz7, Héctor Vázquez-Meza8, Verónica Guarner-Lans9, María Esther Rubio-Ruiz10.
Abstract
Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) activation promotes oxidative stress which increases the risk of cardiac dysfunction in metabolic syndrome (MetS) and favors local insulin resistance. Fibrates regulate RAS improving MetS, type-2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. We studied the effect of fenofibrate treatment on the myocardic signaling pathway of Angiotensin II (Ang II)/Angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1) and its relationship with oxidative stress and myocardial insulin resistance in MetS rats under heart ischemia. Control and MetS rats were assigned to the following groups: (a) sham; (b) vehicle-treated myocardial infarction (MI) (MI-V); and (c) fenofibrate-treated myocardial infarction (MI-F). Treatment with fenofibrate significantly reduced triglycerides, non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), insulin levels and insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR) in MetS animals. MetS and MI increased Ang II concentration and AT1 expression, favored myocardial oxidative stress (high levels of malondialdehyde, overexpression of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase 4 (NOX4), decreased total antioxidant capacity and diminished expression of superoxide dismutase (SOD)1, SOD2 and catalase) and inhibited expression of the insulin signaling cascade: phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (PkB, also known as Akt)/Glut-4/endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS). In conclusion, fenofibrate treatment favors an antioxidant environment as a consequence of a reduction of the Ang II/AT1/NOX4 signaling pathway, reestablishing the cardiac insulin signaling pathway. This might optimize cardiac metabolism and improve the vasodilator function during myocardial ischemia.Entities:
Keywords: angiotensin II; fenofibrate; insulin resistance; metabolic syndrome; myocardial ischemia; oxidative stress
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28036029 PMCID: PMC6155612 DOI: 10.3390/molecules22010031
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Effects of fenofibrate on body characteristics and baseline fasting biochemical parameters from control (CT) and metabolic syndrome (MetS) rats.
| CT-V | CT-F | MetS-V | MetS-F | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight (g) | 522.0 ± 12.4 | 463.5 ± 28.9 | 524.9 ± 23.9 | 490.4 ± 17.1 |
| Visceral fat (g) | 6.2 ± 0.8 | 4.4 ± 0.9 | 12.0 ± 0.6 a | 12.1 ± 1.4 |
| Blood pressure (mmHg) | 97.3 ± 7.2 | 90.7 ± 2.6 | 142.1 ± 1.8 a | 142.7 ± 16.8 a |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 105.2 ± 9.8 | 97.8 ± 6.1 | 115.2 ± 17.8 | 102.6 ± 6.3 |
| Insulin (ng/mL) | 0.08 ± 0.04 | 0.09 ± 0.03 | 0.29 ± 0.04 a | 0.10 ± 0.05 b |
| HOMA-IR | 0.81 ± 0.32 | 1.15 ± 0.38 | 3.52 ± 0.6 a | 1.2 ± 0.53 b |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | 62.4 ± 7.5 | 48.8 ± 1.9 | 57.6 ± 1.7 | 40.6 ± 5.3 |
| HDL-C (mg/dL) | 36.9 ± 5.8 | 36.7 ± 1.6 | 23.7 ± 4.3 a | 25.6 ± 6.4 |
| Non-HDL-C (mg/dL) | 21.7 ± 3.2 | 12.1 ± 2.2 b | 30.4 ± 1.6a | 11.2 ± 3.1 b |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 51.20 ± 21.3 | 20.8 ± 2.3 | 140.6 ± 25.2 a | 41.30 ± 13.2 b |
Values are mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). CT-V: control vehicle-treated; CT-F: control fenofibrate-treated; MetS-V: metabolic syndrome vehicle-treated, MetS-F: metabolic syndrome fenofibrate-treated; HOMA-IR: Homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance; HDL-C: high density lipoprotein cholesterol; n = 8; a p < 0.01 MetS vs. CT same treatment; b p < 0.05 against vehicle corresponding group.
Figure 1Effect of fenofibrate on angiotensin II (Ang II) concentration and the expression of AT1 receptor. (a) Ang II concentration was evaluated in the left ventricles from control (CT) and metabolic syndrome (MetS) rats subjected to sham- (Sh-) or myocardial infarction (MI) and treated two weeks with either vehicle (V) or fenofibrate (F); (b) AT1 protein expression, Arbitrary Units (AU); (c) Representative western blot analysis. Data represent mean ± SEM (n = 5 per group). φ p < 0.05 vs. CT-Sh; Δ p < 0.05 vs. CT-Sh; • p < 0.05 vs. MetS-Sh; # p < 0.05 vs. CT-MI-V; & p < 0.05 vs. MetS-MI-V; Ψ p < 0.05 vs. CT-MI-F. Analysis of variance-Tukey.
Figure 2Effect of fenofibrate administration on myocardial nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate form (NADPH) oxidase (NOX4) (a) and p47phox (b) protein expression, in control and MetS rats under ischemic conditions; (c) Representative western blot analysis. ND: Not determined. Data represent mean ± SEM (n = 5 per group). φ p < 0.05 vs. CT-Sh; Δ p < 0.05 vs. CT-Sh; # p < 0.05 vs. CT-MI-V; & p < 0.05 vs. MetS-MI-V. Analysis of variance-Tukey.
Figure 3Effect of fenofibrate on malondialdehyde concentration (a) and total antioxidant capacity (b). Data represent mean ± SEM (n = 5 per group). φ p < 0.05 vs. CT-Sh; Δ p < 0.05 vs. CT-Sh; # p < 0.05 vs. CT-MI-V; & p < 0.05 vs. MetS-MI-V; Ψ p < 0.05 vs. CT-MI-F. Analysis of variance-Tukey.
Figure 4Expression of cardiac superoxide dismutase (SOD)1, SOD2 and catalase. Antioxidant enzymes were evaluated in the left ventricles from control and metabolic syndrome rats subjected to sham- or myocardial infarction and treated two weeks with either vehicle or fenofibrate. (a) SOD1 protein expression; (b) SOD2 protein expression; (c) catalase protein expression; (d) Representative immunoblot. Data represent mean ± SEM (n = 5 per group). φ p < 0.05 vs. CT-Sh; Δ p < 0.05 vs. CT-Sh; # p < 0.05 vs. CT-MI-V; & p < 0.05 vs. MetS-MI-V. Analysis of variance-Tukey.
Figure 5Fenofibrate treatment improves myocardial insulin resistance in MetS rats. Expression was evaluated by western blot in the myocardial ischemic area from sham, MI-V and MI-F groups. (a) PI3K p110α subunit; (b) p-AktSer473; (c) Glut-4 protein expression; (d) representative immunoblot. Data represent mean ± SEM (n = 5 per group). φ p < 0.05 vs. CT-Sh; Δ p < 0.05 vs. CT-Sh; # p < 0.05 vs. CT-MI-V; & p < 0.05 vs. MetS-MI-V. Analysis of variance-Tukey.
Figure 6Effect of fenofibrate on myocardial expression of eNOS and biopterin concentrations. (a) Expression of eNOS; (b) Expression of p-eNOSSer1177; (c) Representative western blot; (d) Biopterin levels; (e) Oxidized form of biopterin. Protein expression and biopterin concentrations were evaluated in the left ventricles from control (CT) and metabolic syndrome (MetS) rats subjected to sham- (Sh-) or myocardial infarction and treated two weeks with either vehicle (V) or fenofibrate (F). Data represent mean ± SEM (n = 5 per group). φ p < 0.05 vs. CT-Sh; Δ p < 0.05 vs. CT-Sh; # p < 0.05 vs. CT-MI-V; & p < 0.05 vs. MetS-MI-V; ω p < 0.05 vs. CT-MI-V. Analysis of variance-Tukey.
Figure 7Fenofibrate attenuated myocardial ultrastructural damage in MetS and myocardial infarcted rats. CT-Sh (a); CT-MI-V (b); CT-MI-F (c); MetS-Sh (d); MetS-MI-V (e); MetS-MI-F (f). Details by electron microscopy in sarcomere. Mitochondria arranged in rows (Δ); I band (→); swollen mitochondria (*). Magnification 8000×, scale bar represents 2 μm. Images are representative of six different experiments.