Literature DB >> 28035885

Differential Survival between Visual Environments Supports a Role of Divergent Sensory Drive in Cichlid Fish Speciation.

Martine E Maan, Ole Seehausen, Ton G G Groothuis.   

Abstract

Identifying the selective forces that initiate ecological speciation is a major challenge in evolutionary biology. Sensory drive has been implicated in speciation in various taxa, largely based on phenotype-environment correlations and signatures of selection in sensory genes. Here, we present a reciprocal transplant experiment revealing species differences in performance in alternative visual environments, consistent with speciation by divergent sensory drive. The closely related cichlids Pundamilia pundamilia and Pundamilia nyererei inhabit different visual environments in Lake Victoria and show associated differences in visual system properties. Mimicking the two light environments in the laboratory, we find a substantial reduction in survival of both species when reared in the other species' visual environment. This implies that the observed differences in Pundamilia color vision are indeed adaptive and substantiates the implicit assumption in sensory drive speciation models that divergent environmental selection is strong enough to drive divergence in sensory properties.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lake Victoria; Pundamilia; experiment; fitness; mortality; reciprocal transplant; visual adaptation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28035885     DOI: 10.1086/689605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  10 in total

Review 1.  Seeing the rainbow: mechanisms underlying spectral sensitivity in teleost fishes.

Authors:  Karen L Carleton; Daniel Escobar-Camacho; Sara M Stieb; Fabio Cortesi; N Justin Marshall
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Developmental effects of environmental light on male nuptial coloration in Lake Victoria cichlid fish.

Authors:  Daniel Shane Wright; Emma Rietveld; Martine E Maan
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Analysis of structural variants in four African cichlids highlights an association with developmental and immune related genes.

Authors:  Luca Penso-Dolfin; Angela Man; Tarang Mehta; Wilfried Haerty; Federica Di Palma
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 3.260

4.  Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals potential evolutionary differences in adaptation of temperature and body shape among four Percidae species.

Authors:  Peng Xie; Shao-Kui Yi; Hong Yao; Wei Chi; Yan Guo; Xu-Fa Ma; Han-Ping Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Ancestral Hybridization Facilitated Species Diversification in the Lake Malawi Cichlid Fish Adaptive Radiation.

Authors:  Hannes Svardal; Fu Xiang Quah; Milan Malinsky; Benjamin P Ngatunga; Eric A Miska; Walter Salzburger; Martin J Genner; George F Turner; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Contribution of opsins and chromophores to cone pigment variation across populations of Lake Victoria cichlids.

Authors:  Elodie Wilwert; Rampal S Etienne; Louis van de Zande; Martine E Maan
Journal:  J Fish Biol       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 2.504

7.  The pervasive effects of lighting environments on sensory drive in bluefin killifish: an investigation into male/male competition, female choice, and predation.

Authors:  Lisa D Mitchem; Shannon Stanis; Nicholas M Sutton; Zachary Turner; Rebecca C Fuller
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.624

8.  25 Years of sensory drive: the evidence and its watery bias.

Authors:  Molly E Cummings; John A Endler
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 2.624

9.  A perspective on sensory drive.

Authors:  Rebecca C Fuller; John A Endler
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 2.624

10.  Testing sensory drive speciation in cichlid fish: Linking light conditions to opsin expression, opsin genotype and female mate preference.

Authors:  Daniel Shane Wright; Roel van Eijk; Lisa Schuart; Ole Seehausen; Ton G G Groothuis; Martine E Maan
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 2.516

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.