Literature DB >> 28035683

Nuclear inclusion bodies of mutant and wild-type p53 in cancer: a hallmark of p53 inactivation and proteostasis remodelling by p53 aggregation.

Frederik De Smet1,2,3,4, Mirian Saiz Rubio1,2, Daphne Hompes5, Evelyne Naus1,2, Greet De Baets1,2, Tobias Langenberg1,2, Mark S Hipp6, Bert Houben1,2, Filip Claes1,2, Sarah Charbonneau3, Javier Delgado Blanco1,2, Stephane Plaisance7, Shakti Ramkissoon3,8,9, Lori Ramkissoon3, Colinda Simons10, Piet van den Brandt10, Matty Weijenberg10, Manon Van England11, Sandrina Lambrechts12, Frederic Amant12,13, André D'Hoore5, Keith L Ligon3,4,8,9,14, Xavier Sagaert15, Joost Schymkowitz1,2, Frederic Rousseau1,2.   

Abstract

Although p53 protein aggregates have been observed in cancer cell lines and tumour tissue, their impact in cancer remains largely unknown. Here, we extensively screened for p53 aggregation phenotypes in tumour biopsies, and identified nuclear inclusion bodies (nIBs) of transcriptionally inactive mutant or wild-type p53 as the most frequent aggregation-like phenotype across six different cancer types. p53-positive nIBs co-stained with nuclear aggregation markers, and shared molecular hallmarks of nIBs commonly found in neurodegenerative disorders. In cell culture, tumour-associated stress was a strong inducer of p53 aggregation and nIB formation. This was most prominent for mutant p53, but could also be observed in wild-type p53 cell lines, for which nIB formation correlated with the loss of p53's transcriptional activity. Importantly, protein aggregation also fuelled the dysregulation of the proteostasis network in the tumour cell by inducing a hyperactivated, oncogenic heat-shock response, to which tumours are commonly addicted, and by overloading the proteasomal degradation system, an observation that was most pronounced for structurally destabilized mutant p53. Patients showing tumours with p53-positive nIBs suffered from a poor clinical outcome, similar to those with loss of p53 expression, and tumour biopsies showed a differential proteostatic expression profile associated with p53-positive nIBs. p53-positive nIBs therefore highlight a malignant state of the tumour that results from the interplay between (1) the functional inactivation of p53 through mutation and/or aggregation, and (2) microenvironmental stress, a combination that catalyses proteostatic dysregulation. This study highlights several unexpected clinical, biological and therapeutically unexplored parallels between cancer and neurodegeneration.
Copyright © 2017 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2016 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colon cancer; glioblastoma; nuclear inclusion bodies; p53 aggregation; proteostasis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28035683     DOI: 10.1002/path.4872

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pathol        ISSN: 0022-3417            Impact factor:   7.996


  22 in total

1.  p53 amyloid formation leading to its loss of function: implications in cancer pathogenesis.

Authors:  Saikat Ghosh; Shimul Salot; Shinjinee Sengupta; Ambuja Navalkar; Dhiman Ghosh; Reeba Jacob; Subhadeep Das; Rakesh Kumar; Narendra Nath Jha; Shruti Sahay; Surabhi Mehra; Ganesh M Mohite; Santanu K Ghosh; Mamata Kombrabail; Guruswamy Krishnamoorthy; Pradip Chaudhari; Samir K Maji
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 15.828

Review 2.  Mutations, protein homeostasis, and epigenetic control of genome integrity.

Authors:  Jinglin Lucy Xie; Daniel F Jarosz
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2018-08-23

Review 3.  Treating p53 Mutant Aggregation-Associated Cancer.

Authors:  Mathumai Kanapathipillai
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  Aggregation-primed molten globule conformers of the p53 core domain provide potential tools for studying p53C aggregation in cancer.

Authors:  Murilo M Pedrote; Guilherme A P de Oliveira; Adriani L Felix; Michelle F Mota; Mayra de A Marques; Iaci N Soares; Anwar Iqbal; Douglas R Norberto; Andre M O Gomes; Enrico Gratton; Elio A Cino; Jerson L Silva
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  Follow the Mutations: Toward Class-Specific, Small-Molecule Reactivation of p53.

Authors:  Stewart N Loh
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2020-02-14

6.  In Situ Structure of Neuronal C9orf72 Poly-GA Aggregates Reveals Proteasome Recruitment.

Authors:  Qiang Guo; Carina Lehmer; Antonio Martínez-Sánchez; Till Rudack; Florian Beck; Hannelore Hartmann; Manuela Pérez-Berlanga; Frédéric Frottin; Mark S Hipp; F Ulrich Hartl; Dieter Edbauer; Wolfgang Baumeister; Rubén Fernández-Busnadiego
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 7.  When nature's robots go rogue: exploring protein homeostasis dysfunction and the implications for understanding human aging disease pathologies.

Authors:  Julie A Reisz; Alexander S Barrett; Travis Nemkov; Kirk C Hansen; Angelo D'Alessandro
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 3.940

8.  The Carcinogen Cadmium Activates Lysine 63 (K63)-Linked Ubiquitin-Dependent Signaling and Inhibits Selective Autophagy.

Authors:  Abderrahman Chargui; Amine Belaid; Papa Diogop Ndiaye; Véronique Imbert; Michel Samson; Jean-Marie Guigonis; Michel Tauc; Jean-François Peyron; Philippe Poujeol; Patrick Brest; Paul Hofman; Baharia Mograbi
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  Effects of TACE combined with precise RT on p53 gene expression and prognosis of HCC patients.

Authors:  Yupeng Liu; Jingchen Yan; Feng Wang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  Identification of Small Molecules that Modulate Mutant p53 Condensation.

Authors:  Clara Lemos; Luise Schulze; Joerg Weiske; Hanna Meyer; Nico Braeuer; Naomi Barak; Uwe Eberspächer; Nicolas Werbeck; Carlo Stresemann; Martin Lange; Ralf Lesche; Nina Zablowsky; Katrin Juenemann; Atanas Kamburov; Laura Martina Luh; Thomas Markus Leissing; Jeremie Mortier; Michael Steckel; Holger Steuber; Knut Eis; Ashley Eheim; Patrick Steigemann
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2020-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.