Claire Roger1,2, Steven C Wallis3, Laurent Muller4, Gilbert Saissi4, Jeffrey Lipman3,5,6, Roger J Brüggemann7,8,9, Jean-Yves Lefrant4, Jason A Roberts3,5,6,10. 1. Service des Réanimations, Pôle Anesthésie Réanimation Douleur Urgence, CHU Nîmes, Nîmes, France. claire.roger@chu-nimes.fr. 2. Burns, Trauma, and Critical Care Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. claire.roger@chu-nimes.fr. 3. Burns, Trauma, and Critical Care Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. 4. Service des Réanimations, Pôle Anesthésie Réanimation Douleur Urgence, CHU Nîmes, Nîmes, France. 5. School of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. 6. Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Womens' Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. 7. Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 8. Center of Expertise in Mycology Radboudumc/CWZ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 9. Radboud Institute of Health Science, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 10. Pharmacy Department, Royal Brisbane and Womens' Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Sepsis and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) can both significantly affect antifungal pharmacokinetics. This study aimed to describe the pharmacokinetics of caspofungin in critically ill patients during different CRRT modes. METHODS: Patients receiving caspofungin and undergoing continuous veno-venous haemofiltration (CVVH) or haemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) were eligible to take part in the study. Blood samples were collected at seven sampling times during a dosing interval. Demographics and clinical data were recorded. Population pharmacokinetic analysis and Monte-Carlo simulation were undertaken using Pmetrics. RESULTS: Twelve pharmacokinetic profiles from nine patients were analysed. The caspofungin CRRT clearance (CL) was 0.048 ± 0.12 L/h for CVVH and 0.042 ± 0.042 L/h for CVVHDF. A two-compartment linear model best described the data. Patient weight was the only covariate affecting drug CL and central volume. The mean (standard deviation) parameter estimates were 0.64 ± 0.12 L/h for CL, 9.35 ± 3.56 L for central volume, 0.25 ± 0.19 per h for the rate constant for drug distribution from central to peripheral compartments and 0.19 ± 0.10 per h from peripheral to central compartments. Based on simulation results, a caspofungin 100 mg loading dose followed by a 50 mg maintenance dose for patients with a total body weight of ≤80 kg best achieved the pharmacokinetic/PD targets whilst a 70 mg maintenance dose was required for patients with a weight of >80 kg. CONCLUSION: No caspofungin dosing adjustment is necessary for patients undergoing either form of CRRT. However, higher than recommended loading doses of caspofungin are required to achieve pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets in critically ill patients. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01403220.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:Sepsis and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) can both significantly affect antifungal pharmacokinetics. This study aimed to describe the pharmacokinetics of caspofungin in critically illpatients during different CRRT modes. METHODS:Patients receiving caspofungin and undergoing continuous veno-venous haemofiltration (CVVH) or haemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) were eligible to take part in the study. Blood samples were collected at seven sampling times during a dosing interval. Demographics and clinical data were recorded. Population pharmacokinetic analysis and Monte-Carlo simulation were undertaken using Pmetrics. RESULTS: Twelve pharmacokinetic profiles from nine patients were analysed. The caspofungin CRRT clearance (CL) was 0.048 ± 0.12 L/h for CVVH and 0.042 ± 0.042 L/h for CVVHDF. A two-compartment linear model best described the data. Patient weight was the only covariate affecting drug CL and central volume. The mean (standard deviation) parameter estimates were 0.64 ± 0.12 L/h for CL, 9.35 ± 3.56 L for central volume, 0.25 ± 0.19 per h for the rate constant for drug distribution from central to peripheral compartments and 0.19 ± 0.10 per h from peripheral to central compartments. Based on simulation results, a caspofungin 100 mg loading dose followed by a 50 mg maintenance dose for patients with a total body weight of ≤80 kg best achieved the pharmacokinetic/PD targets whilst a 70 mg maintenance dose was required for patients with a weight of >80 kg. CONCLUSION: No caspofungin dosing adjustment is necessary for patients undergoing either form of CRRT. However, higher than recommended loading doses of caspofungin are required to achieve pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets in critically illpatients. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01403220.
Entities:
Keywords:
Caspofungin; Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy; Intensive Care Unit Patient; Sequential Organ Failure Assessment; Total Body Weight
Authors: A Espinel-Ingroff; M C Arendrup; M A Pfaller; L X Bonfietti; B Bustamante; E Canton; E Chryssanthou; M Cuenca-Estrella; E Dannaoui; A Fothergill; J Fuller; P Gaustad; G M Gonzalez; J Guarro; C Lass-Flörl; S R Lockhart; J F Meis; C B Moore; L Ostrosky-Zeichner; T Pelaez; S R B S Pukinskas; G St-Germain; M W Szeszs; J Turnidge Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2013-09-09 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Arnold Louie; Mark Deziel; Weiguo Liu; Michael F Drusano; Tawanda Gumbo; George L Drusano Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Elizabeth M Migoya; Goutam C Mistry; Julie A Stone; Wendy Comisar; Peng Sun; Alisha Norcross; Sheng Bi; Gregory A Winchell; Kalyan Ghosh; Naoto Uemera; Paul J Deutsch; John A Wagner Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2010-08-02 Impact factor: 3.126
Authors: D Andes; D J Diekema; M A Pfaller; J Bohrmuller; K Marchillo; A Lepak Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2010-04-12 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Shellee A Grim; Karen Berger; Christine Teng; Sandeep Gupta; Jennifer E Layden; William M Janda; Nina M Clark Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2011-12-18 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: E W Muilwijk; J A Schouten; H J van Leeuwen; A R H van Zanten; D W de Lange; A Colbers; P E Verweij; D M Burger; P Pickkers; R J M Brüggemann Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2014-08-19 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Tatiana Tatarinova; Michael Neely; Jay Bartroff; Michael van Guilder; Walter Yamada; David Bayard; Roger Jelliffe; Robert Leary; Alyona Chubatiuk; Alan Schumitzky Journal: J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn Date: 2013-02-13 Impact factor: 2.745
Authors: Michael A Pfaller; Shawn A Messer; Leah N Woosley; Ronald N Jones; Mariana Castanheira Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2013-05-29 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Nicolas Garbez; Litaty C Mbatchi; Steven C Wallis; Laurent Muller; Jeffrey Lipman; Jason A Roberts; Jean-Yves Lefrant; Claire Roger Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2021-12-21 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: M Biagi; D Butler; X Tan; S Qasmieh; K Tejani; S Patel; R M Rivosecchi; M H Nguyen; C J Clancy; R K Shields; E Wenzler Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2019-09-16 Impact factor: 5.191