Literature DB >> 28035580

Simultaneous PET/MRI assessment of response to cytotoxic and hormone neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a preliminary report.

Valeria Romeo1, Massimiliano D'Aiuto2, Giuseppe Frasci2, Massimo Imbriaco3, Emanuele Nicolai4.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the response to cytotoxic and hormone neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in four patients with locally advanced breast cancer by simultaneous PET/MRI. Four patients with locally advanced breast cancer underwent simultaneous PET/MRI of the breast using a 3 T Biograph mMR before and after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (two patients were treated with hormone-therapy and two patients were treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy). Morpho-structural tumoral features and tumor size were assessed; area value, metabolic (SUV and MTV) and functional (ADC, K trans, V e, k ep and iAUC) data were obtained by positioning regions of interest. A comparison of all parameters between the pre- and post-treatment PET/MRI examinations and between the two different therapeutic schedules was assessed. In patients treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy and classified as PR, there was a significant reduction of post-treatment morphological, metabolic and functional parameters. In a patient treated with hormone therapy, classified as SD, there was an increase of all post-treatment perfusion parameters, a substantially stable ADC value and a poor reduction of lesion size and of maximum SUV (SUVmax) values; the last patient, treated with hormone therapy and classified as PR, showed a significant reduction of lesion size and SUVmax values with a reduction of perfusion parameters and substantially stable ADC values. Multiparametric evaluation with simultaneous PET/MRI could be a useful tool to assess the response to cytotoxic and hormone neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. Future studies in a larger cohort of patients are warranted to confirm the results of this preliminary study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy; Simultaneous PET/MRI

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28035580     DOI: 10.1007/s12032-016-0876-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oncol        ISSN: 1357-0560            Impact factor:   3.064


  12 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative assessment of tumor metabolism using FDG-PET imaging.

Authors:  W A Weber; M Schwaiger; N Avril
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.408

2.  Measurement of the blood-brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. 1. Fundamental concepts.

Authors:  P S Tofts; A G Kermode
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  PET/MRI: A New Frontier in Breast Cancer Imaging.

Authors:  Annette M Ho; Babak N Kalantari
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 4.  Practical PERCIST: A Simplified Guide to PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.0.

Authors:  Joo Hyun O; Martin A Lodge; Richard L Wahl
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: prediction of pathologic response with PET/CT and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging--prospective assessment.

Authors:  Ukihide Tateishi; Mototaka Miyake; Tomoaki Nagaoka; Takashi Terauchi; Kazunori Kubota; Takayuki Kinoshita; Hiromitsu Daisaki; Homer A Macapinlac
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Value of a Dixon-based MR/PET attenuation correction sequence for the localization and evaluation of PET-positive lesions.

Authors:  Matthias Eiber; Axel Martinez-Möller; Michael Souvatzoglou; Konstantin Holzapfel; Anja Pickhard; Dennys Löffelbein; Ivan Santi; Ernst J Rummeny; Sibylle Ziegler; Markus Schwaiger; Stephan G Nekolla; Ambros J Beer
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-06-18       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 7.  PET/MR in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Claire Tabouret-Viaud; Diomidis Botsikas; Bénédicte M A Delattre; Ismini Mainta; Gaël Amzalag; Olivier Rager; Vincent Vinh-Hung; Raymond Miralbell; Osman Ratib
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.446

Review 8.  Current Status of Hybrid PET/MRI in Oncologic Imaging.

Authors:  Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Kent Friedman; Hersh Chandarana; Amy Melsaether; Linda Moy; Yu-Shin Ding; Komal Jhaveri; Luis Beltran; Rajan Jain
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).

Authors:  E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 10.  Role of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging parameters in the evaluation of treatment response in malignant tumors.

Authors:  Qing-Gang Xu; Jun-Fang Xian
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 2.628

View more
  2 in total

1.  Measuring Glucose Uptake in Primary Invasive Breast Cancer Using Simultaneous Time-of-Flight Breast PET/MRI: A Method Comparison Study with Prone PET/CT.

Authors:  Amy M Fowler; Manoj Kumar; Leah Henze Bancroft; Kelley Salem; Jacob M Johnson; Jillian Karow; Scott B Perlman; Tyler J Bradshaw; Samuel A Hurley; Alan B McMillan; Roberta M Strigel
Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer       Date:  2021-01-15

Review 2.  Assessment and Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: A Comparison of Imaging Modalities and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Valeria Romeo; Giuseppe Accardo; Teresa Perillo; Luca Basso; Nunzia Garbino; Emanuele Nicolai; Simone Maurea; Marco Salvatore
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 6.639

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.