Literature DB >> 28035437

Does substitution of brand name medications by generics differ between pharmacotherapeutic classes? A population-based cohort study in France.

Alicia Molinier1,2, Aurore Palmaro3,4,5, Vanessa Rousseau1,2,6,7, Agnès Sommet1,2,6, Robert Bourrel8, Jean-Louis Montastruc1,2,7, Haleh Bagheri1,2,7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to measure the rate of substitution failure to generic antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) compared to two other pharmacotherapeutic classes (neuroleptics, beta-blockers).
METHODS: We conducted a cohort study involving beneficiaries of the French health insurance system from January 2009 to November 2012. Substitution failure to generic drugs was estimated by the rate of switchback (i.e. from generic drug back to its branded drug). We selected the patients who had a dispensation of a branded AED for 60 days or more during the 90 days preceding the generic substitution. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to model time to switchback for antiepileptics vs. other therapeutic classes in the 90 days after generic substitution, adjusting for age, gender and polytherapy.
RESULTS: The cohort included 6727 patients of whom 1947 were exposed to AEDs, 2398 to neuroleptics and 2382 to beta-blockers. The switchback rate was 62% for AEDs. AED users were more likely to switch back as compared to beta-blocker (crude hazard ratio 1.87; 95% CI 1.68-2.07 for patients under 75) or neuroleptic users. The same observation was made in patients above 75 years (crude hazard ratio 1.36; 95% CI 1.16-1.60).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to beta-blocker users, AED users were more likely to switch back to the branded drug, whereas this difference was not observed with neuroleptics. These results could reflect a poor acceptance of switching AEDs to generic compounds in France.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antiepileptic; Beta-blockers; Generics; Neuroleptics; Primary care; Switchback

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28035437     DOI: 10.1007/s00228-016-2185-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  19 in total

1.  Comparison of health insurance claims and patient interviews in assessing drug use: data from the Three-City (3C) Study.

Authors:  Pernelle Noize; Fabienne Bazin; Carole Dufouil; Nathalie Lechevallier-Michel; Marie-Laure Ancelin; Jean-François Dartigues; Christophe Tzourio; Nicholas Moore; Annie Fourrier-Réglat
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.890

2.  [Generic substitution in primary care in 2011: differences according to pharmacological classes?].

Authors:  A Sommet; B Georgel; J-C Poutrain; S Oustric; R Bourrel; J-L Montastruc; J Birebent
Journal:  Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 1.019

3.  Variations in pill appearance of antiepileptic drugs and the risk of nonadherence.

Authors:  Aaron S Kesselheim; Alexander S Misono; William H Shrank; Jeremy A Greene; Michael Doherty; Jerry Avorn; Niteesh K Choudhry
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 4.  Efficacy and safety of innovator versus generic drugs in patients with epilepsy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ripple Talati; Jennifer M Scholle; Olivia P Phung; Erika L Baker; William L Baker; Ajibade Ashaye; Jeffrey Kluger; Craig I Coleman; C Michael White
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.705

5.  Clinical consequences of generic substitution of lamotrigine for patients with epilepsy.

Authors:  J LeLorier; M S Duh; P E Paradis; P Lefebvre; J Weiner; R Manjunath; O Sheehy
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 9.910

6.  Associations between generic substitution and patients' attitudes, beliefs and experiences.

Authors:  Jette Rathe; Pia Larsen; Morten Andersen; Maja Paulsen; Dorte Jarbøl; Janus Thomsen; Jens Soendergaard
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Generic substitution does not seem to affect adherence negatively in elderly polypharmacy patients.

Authors:  Charlotte Olesen; Philipp Harbig; Ishay Barat; Else Marie Damsgaard
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 2.890

8.  Use of administrative hospital database to identify adverse drug reactions in a Pediatric University Hospital.

Authors:  G Durrieu; A Batz; V Rousseau; E Bondon-Guitton; D Petiot; J L Montastruc
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-10-12       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Compulsory generic switching of antiepileptic drugs: high switchback rates to branded compounds compared with other drug classes.

Authors:  Frederick Andermann; Mei Sheng Duh; Antoine Gosselin; Pierre Emmanuel Paradis
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.864

10.  Generic switching and non-persistence among medicine users: a combined population-based questionnaire and register study.

Authors:  Jette Rathe; Morten Andersen; Dorte Ejg Jarbøl; René dePont Christensen; Jesper Hallas; Jens Søndergaard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Differences in rates of switchbacks after switching from branded to authorized generic and branded to generic drug products: cohort study.

Authors:  Rishi J Desai; Ameet Sarpatwari; Sara Dejene; Nazleen F Khan; Joyce Lii; James R Rogers; Sarah K Dutcher; Saeid Raofi; Justin Bohn; John Connolly; Michael A Fischer; Aaron S Kesselheim; Joshua J Gagne
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-04-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.