Literature DB >> 28034835

Comparative evaluation of dietary probiotics Bacillus subtilis WB60 and Lactobacillus plantarum KCTC3928 on the growth performance, immunological parameters, gut morphology and disease resistance in Japanese eel, Anguilla japonica.

Seunghan Lee1, Kumar Katya2, Youngjin Park1, Seonghun Won1, Minji Seong1, Ali Hamidoghli1, Sungchul C Bai3.   

Abstract

The current experiment was conducted to evaluate and compare the efficacy of two different probiotics Bacillus subtilis WB60 and Lactobacillus plantarum KCTC3928 in diet of Japanese eel, Anguilla japonica. Seven experimental diets were formulated to contain no probiotics (CON), three graded levels of B. subtilis at 106 (BS1), 107 (BS2), 108 (BS3) and L. plantarum at 106 (LP1), 107 (LP2), 108 (LP3) CFU/g diet. Twenty fish averaging 8.29 ± 0.06 g were distributed in to 21 aquaria and were randomly assigned to one of the experimental diets in triplicate groups. Average weight gain (WG), feed efficiency (FE), and protein efficiency ratio (PER) of fish fed B. subtilis at 107 (BS2) and 108 (BS3) CFU/g diet were significantly higher than those of fish fed other experimental diets (P < 0.05). Nonspecific enzymatic activities including lysozyme, superoxide dismutase (SOD), myeloperoxidase (MPO) from fish fed B. subtilis at 107 (BS2) and 108 (BS3) CFU/g diet were detected to be significantly higher than that from fish fed CON diet (P < 0.05). Whereas, level of intestine glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), heat shock protein 70, 90 (HSP70, 90) and immunoglobulin (IgM) from fish fed B. subtilis at 107 and 108 CFU/g diet were recorded to be significantly higher than those of fish fed other experimental diets (P < 0.05). Parameters for intestinal morphology and histology suggested a healthier gut for the fish fed108 (BS3) CFU/g diet as compared to other treatment groups. Whereas, results from the disease challenge test with bacteria Vibrio angulillarum showed significantly lower survival rate for fish fed CON diet than those of fish fed other experimental diets. Therefore, these results indicated that oral supplement of B. subtilis at 108 (BS3) CFU/g diet could be a more effective source of probiotic compared to L. plantarum in Japanese eel.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacillus; Disease resistance; Immune; Japanese eel; Lactobacillus; Probiotics

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28034835     DOI: 10.1016/j.fsi.2016.12.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fish Shellfish Immunol        ISSN: 1050-4648            Impact factor:   4.581


  11 in total

1.  Gut probiotic bacteria of Barbonymus gonionotus improve growth, hematological parameters and reproductive performances of the host.

Authors:  Mohammad Abdus Salam; Md Ariful Islam; Sulav Indra Paul; Md Mahbubur Rahman; Mohammad Lutfar Rahman; Fatama Islam; Ashikur Rahman; Dinesh Chandra Shaha; Md Shah Alam; Tofazzal Islam
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Dietary Application of the Probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum 426951 Enhances Immune Status and Growth of Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) Vaccinated Against Yersinia ruckeri.

Authors:  Mehdi Soltani; Komael Pakzad; Ali Taheri-Mirghaed; Saeed Mirzargar; Seyed Pezhman Hosseini Shekarabi; Parasto Yosefi; Narges Soleymani
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 4.609

3.  Evaluation of Potential Probiotic Properties of a Strain of Lactobacillus plantarum for Shrimp Farming: From Beneficial Functions to Safety Assessment.

Authors:  Cong Wei; Kai Luo; Mingyang Wang; Yongmei Li; Miaojun Pan; Yumeng Xie; Guangcai Qin; Yijun Liu; Li Li; Qingbing Liu; Xiangli Tian
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 4.  Lactic Acid Bacteria in Finfish-An Update.

Authors:  Einar Ringø; Seyed Hossein Hoseinifar; Koushik Ghosh; Hien Van Doan; Bo Ram Beck; Seong Kyu Song
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Evaluation of Potential Probiotics Bacillus subtilis WB60, Pediococcus pentosaceus, and Lactococcus lactis on Growth Performance, Immune Response, Gut Histology and Immune-Related Genes in Whiteleg Shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei.

Authors:  Seonghun Won; Ali Hamidoghli; Wonsuk Choi; Jinho Bae; Won Je Jang; Seunghan Lee; Sungchul C Bai
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-02-19

6.  Effects of Bacillus subtilis WB60 and Lactococcus lactis on Growth, Immune Responses, Histology and Gene Expression in Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus.

Authors:  Seonghun Won; Ali Hamidoghli; Wonsuk Choi; Youngjin Park; Won Je Jang; In-Soo Kong; Sungchul C Bai
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-01-01

7.  Effect of Bacillus velezensis on Aeromonas veronii-Induced Intestinal Mucosal Barrier Function Damage and Inflammation in Crucian Carp (Carassius auratus).

Authors:  Dong-Xing Zhang; Yuan-Huan Kang; Sheng Zhan; Ze-Lin Zhao; Sheng-Nan Jin; Chong Chen; Lei Zhang; Jin-Yu Shen; Chun-Feng Wang; Gui-Qin Wang; Xiao-Feng Shan; Ai-Dong Qian
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Effect of Dietary Supplementation of Lactobacillus Casei YYL3 and L. Plantarum YYL5 on Growth, Immune Response and Intestinal Microbiota in Channel Catfish.

Authors:  Hongyu Zhang; Haibo Wang; Kun Hu; Liting Jiao; Mingjun Zhao; Xianle Yang; Lei Xia
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  SOD1 suppresses pro-inflammatory immune responses by protecting against oxidative stress in colitis.

Authors:  Jiyoung Hwang; Jing Jin; Sejin Jeon; Shin Hye Moon; Min Young Park; Do-Young Yum; Jeong Hyun Kim; Ji-Eun Kang; Mi Hee Park; Eui-Joong Kim; Jae-Gu Pan; Oran Kwon; Goo Taeg Oh
Journal:  Redox Biol       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 11.799

10.  Effects of Dietary Saccharomyces cerevisiae YFI-SC2 on the Growth Performance, Intestinal Morphology, Immune Parameters, Intestinal Microbiota, and Disease Resistance of Crayfish (Procambarus clarkia).

Authors:  Yan Xu; Yiqun Li; Mingyang Xue; Tao Yang; Xiaowen Luo; Yuding Fan; Yan Meng; Wenzhi Liu; Ge Lin; Bo Li; Lingbing Zeng; Yong Zhou
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.