Literature DB >> 28034541

Comparison of Two Inexpensive Rapid Prototyping Methods for Manufacturing Filament Target Ultrasound Phantoms.

Krisztián Füzesi1, Miklós Gyöngy2.   

Abstract

Current use of 3-D printers to manufacture ultrasound phantoms is limited to relatively expensive photopolymer jetting printers. The present work investigates the feasibility of using two common and inexpensive 3-D printer technologies, fused deposition modeling (FDM) and digital light processing (DLP), to print custom filament target phantoms. Acoustic characteristics obtained from printed solid blocks indicated that the printing materials-acrylonitrile butadiene styrene and polylactic acid for FDM and a photopolymer for DLP printing-were appropriate for use as scatterers. A regular grid of filaments was printed to study printing accuracy. As a proof of concept of the phantom manufacturing process, a complex pattern of filament targets was placed in de-ionized water to create a phantom, which was then imaged using an ultrasound imager. The pattern was clearly identifiable, although multiple reflections were observed, which underscores the importance of future work to enhance printing resolution. This goal is deemed possible using improvement of the DLP printing setup.
Copyright © 2016 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3-D printing; Filament targets; Filaments; Ultrasound phantom

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28034541     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  2 in total

1.  Mechanical evaluation for three-dimensional printed orthodontic springs with different heights-in vitro study.

Authors:  Dragan Ströbele; Ahmed Othman; Vasilios Alevizakos; Mesut Turan; Constantin von See
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2021-10-01

Review 2.  Recent advances on the development of phantoms using 3D printing for imaging with CT, MRI, PET, SPECT, and ultrasound.

Authors:  Valeria Filippou; Charalampos Tsoumpas
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 4.071

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.