Literature DB >> 28034506

Development and comparison of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry techniques for analysis of flame retardants.

Jakob Gustavsson1, Lutz Ahrens2, Minh A Nguyen2, Sarah Josefsson3, Karin Wiberg2.   

Abstract

The restrictions on the use of legacy flame retardants (FRs) have increased the need of alternative FRs to comply with fire safety legislations. In this study, the feasibility of three different gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) techniques were investigated for the analysis of 102 legacy and alternative FRs including polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs, n=27), halogenated FRs (HFRs, containing bromine and/or chlorine, n=46), and organophosphorous FRs (OPFRs, n=29). The tested techniques included GC-single MS with (i) electon impact (EI) ionization and (ii) negative chemical ionization (NCI), and (iii) GC-tandem MS (MS/MS) with EI ionization. Out of the tested FRs, 90 could be detected under the used conditions on at least one of the three instrument setups. Later experiments included a selection of these FRs. For the majority of tested PBDEs (5 out of 6) and HFRs (24 out of 26), EI-MS/MS provided the highest detectability (i.e. the lowest detection limits), while for most tested OPFRs (8 out of 13), EI-MS performed better. The influence of matrix components on the analysis of FRs (n=45) was investigated by analyzing a fortified surface water sample with the technique with the lowest selectivity, EI-MS. Both peak enhancement and suppression were observed, and significant correlations between matrix effects and several physico-chemical properties (e.g., retention time and boiling point) were found for PBDEs. In a separate clean-up experiment using natural water spiked with legacy and alternative FRs (n=30), alumina provided the highest mean recovery (90%) in comparison to acidified silica (67%) and Florisil (78%). This study provides new knowledge on analysis of FRs including a wide range of alternative FRs, and it will aid in the efforts of FR monitoring in the environment.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clean-up; Detection limit; Flame retardant; Gas chromatography; Mass spectrometry; Matrix effect

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28034506     DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2016.12.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr A        ISSN: 0021-9673            Impact factor:   4.759


  3 in total

1.  (Persistent) Organic pollutants in Germany: results from a pilot study within the 2015 moss survey.

Authors:  Annekatrin Dreyer; Stefan Nickel; Winfried Schröder
Journal:  Environ Sci Eur       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 5.893

Review 2.  Spatiotemporal Distribution and Analysis of Organophosphate Flame Retardants in the Environmental Systems: A Review.

Authors:  Sinozuko Hope Bika; Abiodun Olagoke Adeniji; Anthony Ifeanyi Okoh; Omobola Oluranti Okoh
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 4.411

3.  A comprehensive evaluation of two sample treatment procedures for the determination of emerging and historical halogenated flame retardants in biota.

Authors:  Imma Tolosa; David Huertas; Sarah Choyke; Sylvia Sander; Yann Aminot
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 4.223

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.