Literature DB >> 28034079

Phase III, Double-Blind, Randomized Trial That Compared Maintenance Lapatinib Versus Placebo After First-Line Chemotherapy in Patients With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 1/2-Positive Metastatic Bladder Cancer.

Thomas Powles1, Robert A Huddart1, Tony Elliott1, Shah-Jalal Sarker1, Charlotte Ackerman1, Robert Jones1, Syed Hussain1, Simon Crabb1, Satinder Jagdev1, John Chester1, Serena Hilman1, Mark Beresford1, Graham Macdonald1, Sundar Santhanam1, John A Frew1, Andrew Stockdale1, Simon Hughes1, Daniel Berney1, Simon Chowdhury1.   

Abstract

Purpose To establish whether maintenance lapatinib after first-line chemotherapy is beneficial in human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) 1/HER2-positive metastatic urothelial bladder cancer (UBC). Methods Patients with metastatic UBC were screened centrally for HER1/HER2 overexpression. Patients who screened positive for HER1/2 and who did not have progressive disease during chemotherapy (four to eight cycles) were randomly assigned one to one to lapatinib or placebo after completion of first-line/initial chemotherapy for metastatic disease. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Results Between 2007 and 2013, 446 patients with UBC were screened, and 232 with HER1- or HER2-positive disease were randomly assigned. The median PFS for lapatinib and placebo was 4.5 (95% CI, 2.8 to 5.4) and 5.1 (95% CI, 3.0 to 5.8) months, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.43; P = .63). The overall survival for lapatinib and placebo was 12.6 (95% CI, 9.0 to 16.2) and 12.0 (95% CI, 10.5 to 14.9) months, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.31; P = .80). Discontinuation due to adverse events were similar in both arms (6% lapatinib and 5% placebo). The rate of grade 3 to 4 adverse events for lapatinib and placebo was 8.6% versus 8.1% ( P = .82). Preplanned subset analysis of patients strongly positive for HER1/HER2 (3+ on immunohistochemistry; n = 111), patients positive for only HER1 (n = 102), and patients positive for only HER2 (n = 42) showed no significant benefit with lapatinib in terms of PFS and overall survival ( P > .05 for each). Conclusion This trial did not find significant improvements in outcome by the addition of maintenance lapatinib to standard of care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28034079     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.66.3468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  46 in total

Review 1.  Precision medicine for urothelial bladder cancer: update on tumour genomics and immunotherapy.

Authors:  Kenneth M Felsenstein; Dan Theodorescu
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  Emerging biomarkers and targeted therapies in urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Prateek Mendiratta; Petros Grivas
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-06

3.  Characterization of metastatic urothelial carcinoma via comprehensive genomic profiling of circulating tumor DNA.

Authors:  Neeraj Agarwal; Sumanta K Pal; Andrew W Hahn; Roberto H Nussenzveig; Gregory R Pond; Sumati V Gupta; Jue Wang; Mehmet A Bilen; Gurudatta Naik; Pooja Ghatalia; Christopher J Hoimes; Dharmesh Gopalakrishnan; Pedro C Barata; Alexandra Drakaki; Bishoy M Faltas; Lesli A Kiedrowski; Richard B Lanman; Rebecca J Nagy; Nicholas J Vogelzang; Kenneth M Boucher; Ulka N Vaishampayan; Guru Sonpavde; Petros Grivas
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Randomized Double-Blind Phase II Study of Maintenance Pembrolizumab Versus Placebo After First-Line Chemotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Cancer.

Authors:  Matthew D Galsky; Amir Mortazavi; Matthew I Milowsky; Saby George; Sumati Gupta; Mark T Fleming; Long H Dang; Daniel M Geynisman; Radhika Walling; Robert S Alter; Mohamad Kassar; Jue Wang; Shilpa Gupta; Nancy Davis; Joel Picus; George Philips; David I Quinn; G Kenneth Haines; Noah M Hahn; Qianqian Zhao; Menggang Yu; Sumanta K Pal
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Many mutations in one clinical-trial basket.

Authors:  Elaine Mardis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  Role of Targeted Therapies in Management of Metastatic Urothelial Cancer in the Era of Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Petros Grivas; Evan Y Yu
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2019-06-28

7.  Maintenance avelumab for metastatic urothelial cancer: a new standard of care.

Authors:  Alisa Erck; Jeanny B Aragon-Ching
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 8.  Molecular and histopathology directed therapy for advanced bladder cancer.

Authors:  Constantine Alifrangis; Ursula McGovern; Alex Freeman; Thomas Powles; Mark Linch
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 9.  HER2-targeted therapies - a role beyond breast cancer.

Authors:  Do-Youn Oh; Yung-Jue Bang
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 10.  [Molecular subtypes of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder-background and clinical relevance].

Authors:  Philipp Erben; Christoph Becker; Igor Tsaur; Matthias B Stope; Tilman Todenhöfer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 0.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.