Kate S Early1, Abigail Stewart, Neil Johannsen, Carl J Lavie, Jerry R Thomas, Michael Welsch. 1. School of Kinesiology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge (Mss Early and Stewart and Dr Johannsen); Department of Preventive Medicine, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana (Drs Johannsen and Lavie); John Ochsner Heart and Vascular Institute, Ochsner Clinical School-the University of Queensland School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana (Dr Lavie); College of Education, University of North Texas, Denton (Dr Thomas); and Institute of Sport and Physical Activity Research, University of Bedfordshire, Bedfordshire, United Kingdom (Dr Welsch).
Abstract
PURPOSE: Flow-mediated dilation, a barometer of cardiovascular (CV) health, is reported to increase with exercise training (ET); however, the potential moderating factors of ET are not clear to date. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of ET assessed by brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (BAFMD). METHODS: Authors searched PubMed between January 1999 and December 2013, bibliographies, and reviews to identify studies examining ET and BAFMD. Two independent reviewers extracted quality, descriptive, exercise, and outcome data of eligible studies. Data were presented as weighted effect sizes (ESs) and 95% confidence limits. RESULTS: Analysis included 66 studies reporting BAFMD data (1865 ET and 635 control subjects). Overall, ET had significant improvements in BAFMD compared with controls (P < .0001). Exercise training at higher ET intensities resulted in a greater increase in BAFMD (9.29; 95% CI, 5.09-13.47) than lower ET intensities (3.63; 95% CI, -0.56 to 7.83) or control (-0.42; 95% CI, -2.06 to 1.21). Subjects whose ET duration was ≥150 min/wk (11.33; 95% CI, 7.15-15.51) had a significant improvement in BAFMD compared with those with <150 min/wk (4.79; 95% CI, 3.08-6.51) or control (-0.30; 95% CI, -1.99 to 1.39). Age (P = .11) and baseline artery diameter (P = .31) did not modify the BAFMD response to ET. CONCLUSION: Exercise training contributes to a significant increase in BAFMD. These results provide indirect evidence that ET alters a well-known factor associated with the primary and secondary prevention of CV diseases. Exercise training interventions, including greater intensity and duration, may optimize the increase in BAFMD.
PURPOSE: Flow-mediated dilation, a barometer of cardiovascular (CV) health, is reported to increase with exercise training (ET); however, the potential moderating factors of ET are not clear to date. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of ET assessed by brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (BAFMD). METHODS: Authors searched PubMed between January 1999 and December 2013, bibliographies, and reviews to identify studies examining ET and BAFMD. Two independent reviewers extracted quality, descriptive, exercise, and outcome data of eligible studies. Data were presented as weighted effect sizes (ESs) and 95% confidence limits. RESULTS: Analysis included 66 studies reporting BAFMD data (1865 ET and 635 control subjects). Overall, ET had significant improvements in BAFMD compared with controls (P < .0001). Exercise training at higher ET intensities resulted in a greater increase in BAFMD (9.29; 95% CI, 5.09-13.47) than lower ET intensities (3.63; 95% CI, -0.56 to 7.83) or control (-0.42; 95% CI, -2.06 to 1.21). Subjects whose ET duration was ≥150 min/wk (11.33; 95% CI, 7.15-15.51) had a significant improvement in BAFMD compared with those with <150 min/wk (4.79; 95% CI, 3.08-6.51) or control (-0.30; 95% CI, -1.99 to 1.39). Age (P = .11) and baseline artery diameter (P = .31) did not modify the BAFMD response to ET. CONCLUSION: Exercise training contributes to a significant increase in BAFMD. These results provide indirect evidence that ET alters a well-known factor associated with the primary and secondary prevention of CV diseases. Exercise training interventions, including greater intensity and duration, may optimize the increase in BAFMD.
Authors: Myles W O'Brien; Said Mekary; Susan A Robinson; Jarrett A Johns; Derek Stephen Kimmerly Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2018-12-10 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Helen M McGettrick; Samuel J E Lucas; Samuel R C Weaver; Catarina Rendeiro; Rebekah A I Lucas; N Timothy Cable; Tom E Nightingale Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2022-09-23 Impact factor: 3.346
Authors: Mary N Woessner; Michael A Welsch; Mitch D VanBruggen; Neil M Johannsen; Daniel P Credeur; Carl F Pieper; Richard Sloane; Conrad P Earnest; Joaquin Ortiz De Zevallos Munoz; Timothy S Church; Eric Ravussin; William E Kraus; Jason D Allen Journal: J Aging Phys Act Date: 2021-08-04 Impact factor: 2.109
Authors: Karsten Königstein; Jonathan Wagner; Denis Infanger; Raphael Knaier; Gilles Nève; Christopher Klenk; Justin Carrard; Timo Hinrichs; Arno Schmidt-Trucksäss Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-04-28
Authors: Yong Zhang; Ya-Jun Zhang; Hong-Wei Zhang; Wei-Bing Ye; Mallikarjuna Korivi Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-22 Impact factor: 3.390