Literature DB >> 28033123

Accuracy of a Modified Lactate Minimum Test and Reverse Lactate Threshold Test to Determine Maximal Lactate Steady State.

Patrick Wahl1,2,3, Christian Manunzio1, Florian Vogt1, Sarah Strütt1, Prisca Volmary1, Wilhelm Bloch2,3, Joachim Mester1,3.   

Abstract

Wahl, P, Manunzio, C, Vogt, F, Strütt, S, Volmary, P, Bloch, W, and Mester, J. Accuracy of a modified lactate minimum test and reverse lactate threshold test to determine maximal lactate steady state. J Strength Cond Res 31(12): 3489-3496, 2017-This study evaluated the accuracy of a modified lactate minimum test (mLMT), a modified reverse lactate threshold test (mRLT), compared with 2 established threshold concepts (onset of blood lactate accumulation [OBLA] and modified maximal deviation method [mDmax]) to determine power output at maximal lactate steady state (MLSS) in cycling. Nineteen subjects performed an mLMT, mRLT, graded exercise test (100 W start, +20 W every 3 minutes) and 3 or more constant-load tests of 30 minutes to determine power output at MLSS. The mLMT and mRLT both consisted of an initial lactate priming segment, followed by a short recovery phase. Afterward, the initial load of the subsequent incremental or reverse segment was calculated individually and was increased or decreased by 10 W every 90 seconds, respectively. The mean difference to MLSS was +2 ± 7 W (mLMT), +5 ± 10 W (mRLT), +9 ± 21 W (OBLA), and +6 ± 14 W (mDmax). The correlation between power output at MLSS and mLMT was highest (r = 0.99), followed by mRLT (r = 0.98), mDmax (r = 0.95), and OBLA (r = 0.90). Because of the higher accuracy of the mLMT and the mRLT to determine MLSS compared with OBLA and mDmax, we suggest both tests as valid and meaningful concepts to estimate power output at MLSS in one single test in moderately trained to well-trained athletes. Additionally, our modified tests provide anaerobic data and do not require detailed knowledge of the subjects' training status compared with previous LMT or RLT protocols.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28033123     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  6 in total

1.  Effect of Endurance Training on The Lactate and Glucose Minimum Intensities.

Authors:  Pedro B Junior; Vitor L de Andrade; Eduardo Z Campos; Carlos A Kalva-Filho; Alessandro M Zagatto; Gustavo G de Araújo; Marcelo Papoti
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 2.  A critical review of critical power.

Authors:  Raffy Dotan
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 3.346

3.  Advances of the reverse lactate threshold test: Non-invasive proposal based on heart rate and effect of previous cycling experience.

Authors:  Leonardo Henrique Dalcheco Messias; Emanuel Elias Camolese Polisel; Fúlvia Barros Manchado-Gobatto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Effects of surgical face masks on cardiopulmonary parameters during steady state exercise.

Authors:  J Lässing; R Falz; C Pökel; S Fikenzer; U Laufs; A Schulze; N Hölldobler; P Rüdrich; M Busse
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Effects of Individualized Low-Intensity Exercise and Its Duration on Recovery Ability in Adults.

Authors:  Doowon Lee; Ju-Yeon Son; Hyo-Myeong Ju; Ji-Hee Won; Seung-Bo Park; Woo-Hwi Yang
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-01

6.  Reverse lactate threshold test accurately predicts maximal lactate steady state and 5 km performance in running.

Authors:  Patrick Wahl; Christian Manunzio; Lukas Zwingmann; Stefan van de Weyer; Wilhelm Bloch
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 2.806

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.