| Literature DB >> 28032672 |
Mónica Muñoz-López1, Aparna Hoskote2, Martin J Chadwick1, Anna M Dzieciol1, David G Gadian3, Kling Chong4, Tina Banks4, Michelle de Haan1, Torsten Baldeweg1, Mortimer Mishkin5, Faraneh Vargha-Khadem1,6.
Abstract
Neonatal hypoxia can lead to hippocampal atrophy, which can lead, in turn, to memory impairment. To test the generalizability of this causal sequence, we examined a cohort of 41 children aged 8-16, who, having received the arterial switch operation to correct for transposition of the great arteries, had sustained significant neonatal cyanosis but were otherwise neurodevelopmentally normal. As predicted, the cohort had significant bilateral reduction of hippocampal volumes relative to the volumes of 64 normal controls. They also had significant, yet selective, impairment of episodic memory as measured by standard tests of memory, despite relatively normal levels of intelligence, academic attainment, and verbal fluency. Across the cohort, degree of memory impairment was correlated with degree of hippocampal atrophy suggesting that even as early as neonatal life no other structure can fully compensate for hippocampal injury and its special role in serving episodic long term memory.Entities:
Keywords: congenital heart disease; hippocampus; memory; perinatal hypoxia-ischaemia; transposition of the great arteries
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28032672 PMCID: PMC5363353 DOI: 10.1002/hipo.22700
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hippocampus ISSN: 1050-9631 Impact factor: 3.899
Figure 1Flow chart illustrating the recruitment of participants.
Indices of Parental Socioeconomic Status and Parental Ratings of the Patients' Behavioral and Social Profiles
| N | Mean | SD | Range | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomic status | ||||
| Father's occupation | 36 | 48.78 | 17.0 | 23–77 |
| Mother's occupation | 33 | 52.52 | 14.1 | 16–77 |
| Child behaviour checklist (CBC) | ||||
| Anxious‐depressed | 38 | 55.45 | 7.4 | 50–80 |
| Withdrawn‐depressed | 38 | 54.39 | 5.4 | 50–70 |
| Somatic complaints | 38 | 56.16 | 7.5 | 50–80 |
| Social problems | 38 | 55.53 | 5.6 | 50–70 |
| Thought problems | 38 | 55.26 | 6.2 | 50–72 |
| Attention problems | 38 | 56.84 | 6.7 | 50–75 |
| Delinquent behaviour (rule‐breaking) | 38 | 53.82 | 4.6 | 50–64 |
| Aggressive behaviour | 38 | 53.26 | 4.3 | 50–68 |
Parental occupation classified according to the International Standard Classification of Occupation (ISCO‐88) transformed into an International Socioeconomic Index of Occupational Status (Ganzeboom et al. 1992) to provide socioeconomic values for the parental occupations with a range of 0–90 (mothers' occupation. P = 0.109; fathers' occupation P = 0.073).
The Child Behavior Checklist (CBC; Achenbach 1991), designed to assess behavioral and social problems of children and adolescents as judged by parental ratings, uses t‐scores with a mean of 50 (SD 10) where < 60 = normal range of functioning; 60–70 = borderline range; and > 70 = clinical range.
Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation.
Figure 2ICV‐corrected hippocampal and global brain volumes in 40 TGA patients against a mean of 64 controls (z‐scores). *denotes p‐values significant at 0.05 level (independent samples t‐test, df = 103). **denotes p‐values significant at 0.001 level (independent samples t‐test, df adjusted).
Cognitive Profile of Children Who Had the Arterial Switch Operation for TGA (age at test: 8–16 years), Compared with Population Norms
| TGA ( | TGA vs. NORM1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (WISC IV) | |||
| Full scale IQ (FSIQ) | 97.0 ± 12.9 | 0.177 | |
| Verbal comprehension | 101.0 ± 13.6 | 0.657 | |
| Perceptual reasoning | 97.5 ± 12.7 | 0.210 | |
| Working memory | 98.6 ± 12.2 | 0.461 | |
| Processing speed | 92.1 ± 13.4 | 0.001 | |
|
| |||
| Word reading | 101.5 ± 13.0 | 0.468 | |
| Reading comprehension | 103.5 ± 13.7 | 0.114 | |
| Spelling | 97.0 ± 14.6 | 0.197 | |
| Numerical operations | 101.5 ± 17.2 | 0.570 | |
| Mathematical reasoning | 99.9 ± 13.7 | 0.948 | |
|
| |||
| Letter fluency | 106.8 ± 14.5 | 0.005 | |
| Category fluency | 100.0 ± 14.0 | 1.000 | |
|
| |||
| General memory (MQ) | 93.2 ± 18.9 | 0.025* | |
| Visual immediate memory | 100.3 ± 14.6 | 0.882 | |
| Visual delayed memory | 93.0 ± 16.6 | 0.010 | |
| Verbal immediate memory | 93.6 ± 17.3 | 0.024* | |
| Verbal delayed memory | 91.7 ± 19.8 | 0.010 | |
| Mean immediate memory (Vis/Verb) | 97.0 ± 12.6 | 0.134 | |
| Mean delayed memory (Vis/Verb) | 92.3 ± 14.2 | 0.001 | |
| Attention | 102.2 ± 15.8 | 0.385 | |
| Learning | 97.8 ± 14.1 | 0.332 | |
| Delayed recognition | 95.4 ± 13.8 | 0.041* | |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| Profile score (/22) | 20.1 ± 2.4 | 18.0 ± 3.3 | <0.001 |
Data are shown as mean standard scores ± standard deviation (SD).
**, *Statistically significant differences.
P‐values are for differences between patients' group mean and the standard mean of 100 (±15) determined by one‐sample t‐test (df = 39; two‐tailed significance).
P‐values are for differences between patient and control groups' mean scores: The scores were compared using a Mann‐Whitney U‐test.
Abbreviations: WISC IV, Wechsler Intelligence scale for children, 4th UK Edition; WIAT, Wechsler individual achievement test, 2nd UK edition; D‐KEFS, Delis‐Kaplan executive function system; CMS, Children's memory scale; RBMT, Rivermead behavioural memory test.
Figure 3Scatter plots illustrate the correlations between corrected hippocampal volumes (HVs) and neuropsychological function. While HVs correlated with measures of memory function, they were independent of IQ and Academic attainments. A. Scatter plot illustrates the poor association between HVs and IQ; B. Graph illustrates the high linear correlation of HVs with Memory Quotient; C. Linear correlation between HVs and RMBT, a measure of episodic and spatial memory; D. Academic attainments were independent of HVs.