Literature DB >> 28032435

Effects of rest intervals and training loads on metabolic stress and muscle hypertrophy.

Julius Fink1, Naoki Kikuchi2, Koichi Nakazato1.   

Abstract

We investigated the effects of volume-matched resistance training (RT) with different training loads and rest intervals on acute responses and long-term muscle and strength gains. Ten subjects trained with short rest (30 s) combined with low load (20 RM) (SL) and ten subjects performed the same protocol with long rest (3 min) and high load (8 RM) (LH). Cross-sectional area (CSA) of the upper arm was measured by magnetic resonance imaging before and after 8 weeks of training. Acute stress markers such as growth hormone (GH) and muscle thickness (MT) changes have been assessed pre and post a single RT session. Only the SL group demonstrated significant increases in GH (7704·20 ± 11833·49%, P<0·05) and MT (35·2 ± 16·9%, P<0·05) immediately after training. After 8 weeks, the arm CSA s in both groups significantly increased [SL: 9·93 ± 4·86% (P<0·001), LH: 4·73 ± 3·01% (P<0·05)]. No significant correlation between acute GH elevations and CSA increases could be observed. We conclude that short rest combined with low-load training might induce a high amount of metabolic stress ultimately leading to improved muscle hypertrophy while long rest with high-load training might lead to superior strength increases. Acute GH increases seem not to be directly correlated with muscle hypertrophy.
© 2016 Scandinavian Society of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anabolic responses; growth hormone; maximal voluntary contraction; muscle swelling; muscle thickness

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28032435     DOI: 10.1111/cpf.12409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Physiol Funct Imaging        ISSN: 1475-0961            Impact factor:   2.273


  5 in total

Review 1.  Resistance Training and Skeletal Muscle Protein Metabolism in Eumenorrheic Females: Implications for Researchers and Practitioners.

Authors:  Olivia E Knowles; Brad Aisbett; Luana C Main; Eric J Drinkwater; Liliana Orellana; Séverine Lamon
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Interpreting Adaptation to Concurrent Compared with Single-Mode Exercise Training: Some Methodological Considerations.

Authors:  Jackson J Fyfe; Jeremy P Loenneke
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  The Effect of Rest Interval Length on Upper and Lower Body Exercises in Resistance-Trained Females.

Authors:  Desmond J Millender; Zachary A Mang; Jason R Beam; Rogelio A Realzola; Len Kravitz
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2021-10-01

4.  Description of training loads using whole-body exercise during high-intensity interval training.

Authors:  Alexandre F Machado; Alexandre L Evangelista; João Marcelo Q Miranda; Cauê V La Scala Teixeira; Roberta Luksevicius Rica; Charles R Lopes; Aylton Figueira-Júnior; Julien S Baker; Danilo S Bocalini
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 2.365

5.  Effects of Pre-exhaustion Versus Traditional Resistance Training on Training Volume, Maximal Strength, and Quadriceps Hypertrophy.

Authors:  Thiago Barbosa Trindade; Jonato Prestes; Leônidas Oliveira Neto; Radamés Maciel Vitor Medeiros; Ramires Alsamir Tibana; Nuno Manuel Frade de Sousa; Eduardo Estevan Santana; Breno Guilherme de A T Cabral; Whitley Jo Stone; Paulo Moreira Silva Dantas
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 4.566

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.