Literature DB >> 28032308

The Effect of Pinyin Input Experience on the Link Between Semantic and Phonology of Chinese Character in Digital Writing.

Jingjun Chen1, Rong Luo2, Huashan Liu3.   

Abstract

With the development of ICT, digital writing is becoming much more common in people's life. Differently from keyboarding alphabets directly to input English words, keyboarding Chinese character is always through typing phonetic alphabets and then identify the glyph provided by Pinyin input-method software while in this process which do not need users to produce orthography spelling, thus it is different from traditional written language production model based on handwriting process. Much of the research in this domain has found that using Pinyin input method is beneficial to Chinese characters recognition, but only a small part explored the effects of individual's Pinyin input experience on the Chinese characters production process. We ask whether using Pinyin input-method will strengthen the semantic-phonology linkage or semantic-orthography linkage in Chinese character mental lexicon. Through recording the RT and accuracy of participants completing semantic-syllable and semantic-glyph consistency judgments, the results found the accuracy of semantic-syllable consistency judgments in high Pinyin input experienced group was higher than that in low-experienced group, and RT was reversed. There were no significant differences on semantic-glyph consistency judgments between the two groups. We conclude that using Pinyin input method in Chinese digital writing can strengthen the semantic-phonology linkage while do not weakening the semantic-orthography linkage in mental lexicon at the same time, which means that Pinyin input method is beneficial to lexical processing involving Chinese cognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28032308     DOI: 10.1007/s10936-016-9470-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  5 in total

1.  Electrophysiological chronometry of semantic context effects in language production.

Authors:  Sabrina Aristei; Alissa Melinger; Rasha Abdel Rahman
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Google effects on memory: cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips.

Authors:  Betsy Sparrow; Jenny Liu; Daniel M Wegner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  China's language input system in the digital age affects children's reading development.

Authors:  Li Hai Tan; Min Xu; Chun Qi Chang; Wai Ting Siok
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Shared syntax in language production and language comprehension--an FMRI study.

Authors:  Katrien Segaert; Laura Menenti; Kirsten Weber; Karl Magnus Petersson; Peter Hagoort
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  The write way to spell: printing vs. typing effects on orthographic learning.

Authors:  Gene Ouellette; Talisa Tims
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-02-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.