Literature DB >> 28032164

Innovative Management of Implant Exposure in ADM/Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with Negative Pressure Wound Therapy.

Antonello Accurso1, Nicola Rocco2, Giuseppe Accardo1, Paola Reale1, Carmela Salerno1, Edi Mattera3, Francesco D'Andrea4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: One-stage implant-based breast reconstruction has been recently improved by the introduction of biological [acellular dermal matrix (ADM)] and synthetic meshes. Advantages of ADMs in implant-based breast reconstruction derive from the expansion of the space available for the direct positioning of an implant, but their use could be associated with several complications. Although the majority of complications can be easily managed, mistakes in dealing with the first clinical signs of a potential adverse event can lead to implant loss. CASE
PRESENTATION: We report a case of ADM/implant exposure following NAC-sparing mastectomy and immediate implant-based reconstruction, successfully managed with an innovative staged treatment using negative pressure wound therapy, which allowed a rapid re-positioning of the prosthesis after complete clearance of bacteria from the implant pocket. DISCUSSION: The safest strategy to manage implant exposure and concomitant bacterial growth is reported to be implant removal and delayed re-positioning after several months, following prolonged targeted antibiotic therapy. Our case shows how a short-time implant re-positioning following implant removal for implant exposure could be successfully pursued thanks to the shrewd use of negative pressure wound therapy with great advantages in terms of patient satisfaction and post-operative quality of life, offering women experiencing this complication the option of not delaying reconstruction for months after resolution of the complication, potentially avoiding major surgical procedures such as autologous tissue reconstructions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Entities:  

Keywords:  A cellular dermal matrix; Breast reconstruction; Implant exposure; Negative pressure wound therapy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28032164     DOI: 10.1007/s00266-016-0739-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg        ISSN: 0364-216X            Impact factor:   2.326


  5 in total

1.  Nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction - early complications and outcomes of the treatment.

Authors:  Artur Bocian; Piotr Kędzierawski; Krzysztof Kurczych; Przemysław Jasnowski; Daniel Maliszewski; Agnieszka Kołacińska
Journal:  Prz Menopauzalny       Date:  2020-10-02

2.  Fat grafting for resurfacing an exposed implant in lower extremity: A case report.

Authors:  Yun-Nan Lin; Chieh-Han Chuang; Shih-Hao Huang; Shu-Hung Huang; Tsai-Ming Lin; I-Wen Lin; Sin-Daw Lin; Yur-Ren Kuo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  Salvaging the Unsalvageable: Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Severe Infection of Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Farid Meybodi; Negin Sedaghat; Elisabeth Elder; James French; Kristian Adams; Jeremy Hsu; Kavitha Kanesalingam; Meagan Brennan
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-03-26

4.  Rinse But Don't Repeat: Single Application V.A.C. VERAFLO Salvages Infected Breast Prostheses.

Authors:  Lauren E Antognoli; Devinder P Singh; Salman Choudhry; Justin Turcotte; Luther H Holton
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-10-29

5.  Comparison of Volume Retention and Biocompatibility of Acellular Dermal Matrix/Hyaluronic Acid Filler to Autologous Fat Grafts in a Mouse Model.

Authors:  Ji Hun Kim; Sun Eung Kim; Yu Jin Kim; Yang Woo Kim; Young Woo Cheon
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 2.708

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.