Literature DB >> 28032101

Current Susceptibility Status of Anopheles stephensi (Diptera: Culicidae) to Different Imagicides in a Malarious Area, Southeastern of Iran.

Mohammad Amin Gorouhi1, Hassan Vatandoost1, Mohammad Ali Oshaghi1, Ahmad Raeisi2, Ahmad Ali Enayati3, Hossein Mirhendi4, Ahmad Ali Hanafi-Bojd1, Mohammad Reza Abai1, Yaser Salim-Abadi5, Fatemeh Rafi1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anopheles mosquitoes are an important group of arthropods due to their role in transmission of malaria. The present study was conducted for determination of susceptibility status of Anopheles stephensi to different imagicides collected from malarious area in Chabahar city, Iran.
METHODS: In the present study seven insecticides including: DDT 4%, lambdacyhalothrin 0.05%, deltamethrin 0.05%, permethrin 0.75%, cyfluthrin 0.15% and etofenprox 0.5% were tested based on WHO method. Regression line was plotted for each insecticide using mortality of different exposure times. Bioassay data were analyzed using Probit software and the lethal time for 50% and 90% mortality (LT50 and LT90) values were calculated.
RESULTS: The susceptibility levels of field strain of An. stephensi to the discriminative dose of different imagicides were determined 100, 98, 96, 89, 82 and 62% for etofenprox, permethrin, deltamethrin, lambdacyhalothrin, cyfluthrin and DDT, respectively. Our finding indicated that An. stephensi is resistant to DDT, lambdacyhalothrin and cyfluthrin, and susceptible to etofenprox and permethrin and candidate of resistant to deltamethrin based on WHO criteria.
CONCLUSION: Our findings indicated that An. stephensi is resistant to DDT and some pyrethroid insecticides which can be developed due to application of insecticides in health and agriculture. These results can provide a clue for future chemical control program in the study area.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anopheles stephensi; Chabahar; Pyrethroid resistance; Susceptibility test

Year:  2016        PMID: 28032101      PMCID: PMC5186739     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthropod Borne Dis        ISSN: 2322-1984            Impact factor:   1.198


Introduction

Mosquitoes as a big group of arthropods play an important role in transmission of many diseases to human such as malaria, filariasis, yellow fever, dengue fever (Horsfall 1955, Tabachnick 1991, Service 2003, Azari-Hamidian 2011). Some species of Anopheles mosquitoes are vectors of malaria in different parts of the world. For example, Anopheles stephensi Liston (Diptera: Culicidae) is the main malaria vector in Eastern Mediterranean region and south of Asia continent (Zahar 1974,Vatandoost et al. 2006). In Iran there are some species of malaria vectors including: An. stephensi, An. dthali, An. culicifacies, An. fluviatilis, An. superpictus s.l., An. sacharovi, An. maculipennis Complex (Naddaf et al. 2003, Azari-Hamidian 2011, Mehravaran et al. 2011, Oshaghi et al. 2011). Before initiating of national malaria control program in 1957, malaria cases were reported from most parts of Iran, Since then, due to implementing of many continuous interventions, malaria confined to south eastern parts of the country including Sistan va Baluchestan, Hormozgan and southern parts of Kerman Provinces (Edrissian 2006, Vatandoost et al. 2011). For controlling of malaria, vector control is one the most important approach which focuses on chemical control of mosquitoes. Up to now different group of insecticides including: organochlorines (DDT, dieldrin and BHC), organophosphates (pirimiphos-methyl, malathion), carbamates (propoxur) and pyrethroids (lambdacyhalothrin, delthamethrin) in different forms of application such as Indoor Residual Spraying (IRS), Insecticide Treated Nets (ITNS) for adult stage and some organophosphates for larviciding were used in malariaous area of Iran (Salim Abadi et al. 2010, Hanafi-Bojd et al. 2012, Vatandoost and Hanafi-Bojd 2012). Resistance of Anopheles spp to DDT and pyrethroid insecticides were reported from different countries around the world like China, Turkey, India, some countries of Africa and Latin America (Kasap et al. 2000, Hargreaves et al. 2003, Syafruddin et al. 2010, Lol et al. 2013, Soltani et al. 2013, Chang et al. 2014). In Iran many researches have evaluated susceptibility status of malaria vectors against different insecticides (Vatandoost and Hanafi-Bojd 2005, Hanafi-Bojd et al. 2006, Vatandoost et al. 2006, Vatandoost et al. 2011, Vatandoost and Hanafi-Bojd 2012). Approximately in all previous conducted studies on An. stephensi in Iran, resistance to DDT and susceptibility to pyrethroids have been reported, but in 2012 first indication of resistance to pyrethroid compounds was reported from south eastern parts of the country (Vatandoost and Hanafi-Bojd 2012). Resistances to DDT, mainly in the adult stage of An. stephensi, have been widely distributed in Middle-East and Indian subcontinent causing operational problems for control programs (WHO 1985, WHO 1992). This study aims to monitor susceptibility status of main malaria vector, An. stephensi, to some insecticides in Chabahar City, Sistan va Baluchestan Province, Iran.

Materials and Methods

Study area

This study was performed in Chabahar seaport (25° 25′N, 60° 45′E), Sistan va Baluchestan Province of Iran during April to June 2013 (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.

The map of Chabahar City representing rural districts, Sistan and Baluchistan Province (Study area), Iran

The map of Chabahar City representing rural districts, Sistan and Baluchistan Province (Study area), Iran

Mosquito sampling and rearing

Collected larvae from the study area were transferred to the insectary for rearing under standard conditions (Temperature= 25–29° C, photo-period=12:12 Hours (light: Dark) and Humidity=50–70%). Emerged adult mosquitoes were fed with 10% aqueous sucrose solution.

Adult susceptibility test

Adult susceptibility tests were carried out according to the current World Health Organization method (WHO 2013). For each insecticide mortality rate in various times also were calculated and then regression line to each insecticide plotted using Microsoft Excel (version. 2013).

Insecticide impregnated papers

The following insecticides impregnated papers were supplied according to WHO Test procedure including: DDT 4%, lambdacyhalothrin 0.05%, deltamethrin 0.05%, permethrin 0.75%, cyfluthrin 0.15% and etofenprox 0.5%. Mineral oil, and silicon oil impregnated papers were used for organo-chlorine insecticides and pyrethroids as control, respectively (WHO 1981, WHO 2013).

Statistical analysis

Results were analyzed by using of Probit program (Finney 1971). In case of mortality, when the control mortality was between 5% to 20% it was corrected by Abbott's formula (Abbott 1925). Error bars for each mortality were calculated based on statistical method at α=5%. The lethal Time for 50% and 90% mortality (LT50 and LT90) values and their 95% confidence interval also Probit regression line parameters were determined with Finney method and then the regression line of all Insecticides were plotted using Microsoft Excel (version. 2013).

Results

The results of susceptibility test for each insecticides are shown in tables 1,2. Mortality rate and lethal Time for 50% mortality (LT50) of different insecticides were calculated. Our finding indicated that Etofenprox, Deltamethrin, Lambdacyhalothrin, Permethrin, Cyfluthrin and DDT have the lowest to highest LT50 value respectively (Fig. 2).
Table 1.

Probit regression line parameters of Anopheles stephensi exposed to different insecticides

InsecticideAB±SELT50, 95% C.I. (Second)LT90, 95% C.I. (Second)X2(df)P value
Etofenprox 0.05%−2.681.33± 0.14756265.11 (3)>0.05
104957
1381749
Permethrin 0.75%−5.612.22±0.212779842.89 (2)>0.05
3351266
4011775
Cyfluthrin0.15%−3.791.3±0.1265651211.97(4)>0.05
8127805
101014160
Lambdacyhalothrin 0.05%−3.251.36±0.1218514140.04(2)>0.05
2462146
3243791
Deltamethrin 0.05%−2.691.22±0.1510111940.95(2)>0.05
1591785
2213277
DDT 4%−4.472.5±0.33282075606.99(3)>0.05
324010200
384016560

A= y-intercept, B= the slope of the line, SE= Standard error, CI= confidence interval, x2= heterogeneity about the regression line, df= degree of freedom, P> 0.05 =represent no heterogeneity in the population of tested mosquitos.

Table 2.

Mortality rate and susceptibility status of Anopheles stephensi exposed to different insecticides Chabahar, southeastern Iran, 2013

InsecticideMR±EB*Resistance status**
Deltamethrin96±3.8RC
Lmbdacyhalothrin89±2.8R
Cyfluthrin82±3.5R
Permethrin98±1S
Etofenprox100S
DDT62±4.8R
control-

Mortality Rate±Error Bar

R Resistance, RC Resistant Candidate, T Tolerance, S Susceptible

Fig. 2.

Regression lines of Anopheles stephensi exposed to different insecticides (field population), 2013

Regression lines of Anopheles stephensi exposed to different insecticides (field population), 2013 Probit regression line parameters of Anopheles stephensi exposed to different insecticides A= y-intercept, B= the slope of the line, SE= Standard error, CI= confidence interval, x2= heterogeneity about the regression line, df= degree of freedom, P> 0.05 =represent no heterogeneity in the population of tested mosquitos. Mortality rate and susceptibility status of Anopheles stephensi exposed to different insecticides Chabahar, southeastern Iran, 2013 Mortality Rate±Error Bar R Resistance, RC Resistant Candidate, T Tolerance, S Susceptible

Discussion

In the current study seven insecticides including: DDT 4%, lambdacyhalothrin 0.05%, deltamethrin 0.05%, permethrin 0.75%, cyfluthrin 0.15% and etofenprox 0.5% were used to determine susceptibility status of An. stephensi collected from Chabahar City. Based on WHO criteria that suggested (98– 100% mortality indicates susceptibility, 90– 97% mortality indicates resistance candidate (more investigation is needed) and less than 90% mortality suggests resistance (WHO 2013). Results indicated that species is resistant to DDT, cyfluthrin and Lambdacyhalothrin, However, susceptible to permethrin and Etophenprox. The indication of resistant to deltamethrin at the early stages of evolution has also be documented. Our findings reveal that An. stephensi is resistant to DDT which is in line with previous researches results that have been performed in our study area (Vatandoost and Hanafi-Bojd 2012, Fathian et al. 2015). Majority of susceptibility tests which performed during the past decade in different malarious area revealed resistance to DDT in southern part of Iran (Borhani 2004, Vatandoost et al. 2005, Vatandoost et al. 2006) as well as in the most distribution area of An. stephensi in the world (Rathor et al. 1980, Thavaselvam et al. 1993, Tikar et al. 2011, Chang et al. 2014, Singh et al. 2014). Furthermore, there are many resistance reports to DDT in other species of Anopheles mosquitoes from different part of the world (Hemingway and Ranson 2000, Hemingway et al. 2002, Zahirnia et al. 2002, Lak et al. 2002, Balkew et al. 2006, Raghavendra et al. 2010, Tikar et al. 2011, Vatandoost et al. 2011, Nardini et al. 2013, Wang et al. 2013). In the present study resistance to cyfluthrin and lambdacyhalothrin were indicated and these findings are in line with previous research results that have been conducted in the same area (Vatandoost and Hanafi-Bojd 2012). On the other hand our finding about cyfluthrin susceptibility status is not in concordance with another research that has been performed previously in the same area by Fathian et al. (2015) that showed this species is susceptible to cyfluthrin. (Fathian et al. 2015). It may be due to different sampling localities. Resistance of An. stephensi to pyrethroid compounds were reported from its different distribution regions, for instance in the study was performed by Rathor et al. (2013) in Punjab Province of Pakistan, resistance to three commonly used pyrethroids, permethrin, lambdacyhalothrin, and deltamethrin were indicated from the majority of test localities (Rathor et al. 2013). In the present study An. stephensi was susceptible to Etophenprox and Permethrin that these findings are in parallel with other previous conducted researches results (Vatandoost et al. 2005). In the current study deltametthrin was indicated as resistant candidate so that more investigation is needed. Molecular and biochemical assays for this species as a main malaria vector must be conducted for accurate evaluating of resistance status of pyre-throid insecticides specially those commonly used in malaria control program.

Conclusion

In the present study An. stephensi was found resistant to DDT and some pyrethroid insecticides. This enhanced resistance status may be due to previous chemical control programs against malaria vectors, such as IRS/ITNs or insecticide application in agriculture. However, more investigation for determination of resistance mechanisms is necessary. Furthermore regular monitoring of resistance status by standard bioassay tests and other complementary methods especially in active foci of malaria transmission is suggested.
  28 in total

1.  Anopheline species composition in borderline of Iran-Azerbaijan.

Authors:  M A Oshaghi; H Vatandoost; A Gorouhi; M R Abai; A Madjidpour; S Arshi; H Sadeghi; M Nazari; A Mehravaran
Journal:  Acta Trop       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 3.112

2.  An overview of insecticide resistance.

Authors:  Janet Hemingway; Linda Field; John Vontas
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-10-04       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Very high DDT-resistant population of Anopheles pharoensis Theobald (Diptera: Culicidae) from Gorgora, northern Ethiopia.

Authors:  M Balkew; I Elhassen; M Ibrahim; T Gebre-Michael; H Engers
Journal:  Parasite       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.000

4.  Entomological and epidemiological attributes for malaria transmission and implementation of vector control in southern Iran.

Authors:  A A Hanafi-Bojd; H Vatandoost; M A Oshaghi; A A Haghdoost; M Shahi; M M Sedaghat; F Abedi; M Yeryan; A Pakari
Journal:  Acta Trop       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 3.112

5.  Review of the ecology of malaria vectors in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region.

Authors:  A R Zahar
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 9.408

6.  Status of insecticide resistance in anopheline mosquitoes of Punjab Province, Pakistan.

Authors:  H R Rathor; G Toqir; W K Reisen
Journal:  Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 0.267

7.  Resistance status of the malaria vector mosquitoes, Anopheles stephensi and Anopheles subpictus towards adulticides and larvicides in arid and semi-arid areas of India.

Authors:  S N Tikar; M J Mendki; A K Sharma; D Sukumaran; Vijay Veer; Shri Prakash; B D Parashar
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.857

8.  Larval habitat characteristics of the genus anopheles (Diptera: culicidae) and a checklist of mosquitoes in guilan province, northern iran.

Authors:  S Azari-Hamidian
Journal:  Iran J Arthropod Borne Dis       Date:  2011-06-30

9.  Molecular evidence for historical presence of knock-down resistance in Anopheles albimanus, a key malaria vector in Latin America.

Authors:  Juan C Lol; María E Castellanos; Kelly A Liebman; Audrey Lenhart; Pamela M Pennington; Norma R Padilla
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.876

10.  Baseline Susceptibility of Different Geographical Strains of Anopheles stephensi (Diptera: Culicidae) to Temephos in Malarious Areas of Irana.

Authors:  Aboozar Soltani; Hassan Vatandoost; Mohammad Ali Oshaghi; Ahmad Ali Enayati; Ahmad Raeisi; Mohammad Reza Eshraghian; Mohammad Mehdi Soltan-Dallal; Ahmad Ali Hanafi-Bojd; Mohammad Reza Abai; Fatemeh Rafi
Journal:  J Arthropod Borne Dis       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 1.198

View more
  22 in total

1.  Insecticide susceptibility of Anopheles stephensi to DDT and current insecticides in an elimination area in Iran.

Authors:  Mehdi Zare; Moussa Soleimani-Ahmadi; Sayed Hossein Davoodi; Alireza Sanei-Dehkordi
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 3.876

2.  Dynamics of Transgenic Enterobacter cloacae Expressing Green Fluorescent Protein Defensin (GFP-D) in Anopheles stephensi Under Laboratory Condition.

Authors:  Hossein Dehghan; Mohammad Ali Oshaghi; Seyed Hassan Moosa-Kazemi; Bagher Yakhchali; Hassan Vatandoost; Naseh Maleki-Ravasan; Yavar Rassi; Habib Mohammadzadeh; Mohammad Reza Abai; Fatemeh Mohtarami
Journal:  J Arthropod Borne Dis       Date:  2017-12-30       Impact factor: 1.198

3.  Evaluation of Deltamethrin in Combination of Piperonyl Butoxide (PBO) against Pyrethroid Resistant, Malaria Vector, Anopheles stephensi in IRS Implementation: an Experimental Semi-Filed Trial in Iran.

Authors:  Fatemeh Nikpour; Hassan Vatandoost; Ahmad Ali Hanafi-Bojd; Ahmad Raeisi; Mansour Ranjbar; Ahmad Ali Enayati; Mohammad Reza Abai; Mansoreh Shayeghi; Abdol Rasoul Mojahedi; Abolghasem Pourreza
Journal:  J Arthropod Borne Dis       Date:  2017-12-30       Impact factor: 1.198

4.  Baseline Susceptibility of Filarial Vector Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) to Five Insecticides with Different Modes of Action in Southeast of Iran.

Authors:  Yaser Salim-Abadi; Mohammad Asadpour; Iraj Sharifi; Alireza Sanei-Dehkordi; Mohammad Amin Gorouhi; Azim Paksa; Zohre Tayyebi; Abbas Aghaei-Afshar
Journal:  J Arthropod Borne Dis       Date:  2017-12-30       Impact factor: 1.198

Review 5.  Evidence of metabolic mechanisms playing a role in multiple insecticides resistance in Anopheles stephensi populations from Afghanistan.

Authors:  Noor Halim Zahid Safi; Abdul Ali Ahmadi; Sami Nahzat; Seyyed Payman Ziapour; Seyed Hassan Nikookar; Mahmoud Fazeli-Dinan; Ahmadali Enayati; Janet Hemingway
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 2.979

6.  Evolution of insecticide resistance and its mechanisms in Anopheles stephensi in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region.

Authors:  Ahmadali Enayati; Ahmad Ali Hanafi-Bojd; Mohammad Mehdi Sedaghat; Morteza Zaim; Janet Hemingway
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 2.979

7.  Biochemical Basis of Cyfluthrin and DDT Resistance in Anopheles stephensi (Diptera: Culicidae) in Malarious Area of Iran.

Authors:  Mohammad Amin Gorouhi; Mohammad Ali Oshaghi; Hassan Vatandoost; Ahmad Ali Enayati; Ahmad Raeisi; Mohamad Reza Abai; Yaser Salim-Abadie; Ahmad Ali Hanafi-Bojd; Azim Paksa; Fatemeh Nikpoor
Journal:  J Arthropod Borne Dis       Date:  2018-09-30       Impact factor: 1.198

Review 8.  Bioecology of Dominant Malaria Vector, Anopheles superpictus s.l. (Diptera: Culicidae) in Iran.

Authors:  Hassan Vatandoost; Ahmad Ali Hanafi-Bojd; Ahmad Raeisi; Mohammad Reza Abai; Fatemeh Nikpour
Journal:  J Arthropod Borne Dis       Date:  2018-09-30       Impact factor: 1.198

9.  Spatial Modelling of Malaria in South of Iran in Line with the Implementation of the Malaria Elimination Program: A Bayesian Poisson-Gamma Random Field Model.

Authors:  Amin Ghanbarnejad; Habibollah Turki; Mehdi Yaseri; Ahmad Raeisi; Abbas Rahimi-Foroushani
Journal:  J Arthropod Borne Dis       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 1.198

Review 10.  Monitoring and Mapping of Insecticide Resistance in Medically Important Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in Iran (2000-2020): A Review.

Authors:  Yaser Salim Abadi; Alireza Sanei-Dehkordi; Azim Paksa; Mohammad Amin Gorouhi; Hassan Vatandoost
Journal:  J Arthropod Borne Dis       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 1.198

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.