Literature DB >> 28032100

High Insecticides Resistance in Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae) from Tehran, Capital of Iran.

Yaser Salim-Abadi1, Mohammad Ali Oshaghi1, Ahmad Ali Enayati2, Mohammad Reza Abai1, Hassan Vatandoost1, Mohammad Reza Eshraghian3, Hossein Mirhendi4, Ahmad Ali Hanafi-Bojd1, Mohammad Amin Gorouhi5, Fatemeh Rafi1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: During recent years transmission of Dirofilaria immitis (dog heart worm) by Culex pipiens and West Nile virus have been reported from Iran. The present study was preformed for evaluating the susceptibility status of Cx. pipiens collected from capital city of Tehran, Iran.
METHODS: Four Insecticides including: DDT 4%, Lambdacyhalothrin 0.05%, Deltamethrin 0.05% and Cyfluthrin 0.15 % according to WHO standard methods were used for evaluating the susceptibility status of Cx. pipiens from Tehran moreover For comparison susceptibility status a Laboratory strain also was used. Bioassay data were analyzed using Probit program. The lethal time for 50% and 90% mortality (LT50 and LT90) values were calculated from regression line.
RESULTS: The susceptibility status of lab strain of Cx. pipiens revealed that it is susceptible to Lambdacyhalothrin, Deltamethrin, Cyfluthrin and resistant to DDT. Moreover cyfluthrin with LT50=36 seconds and DDT with LT50=3005 seconds had the least and most LT50s. Field population was resistance to all tested insecticides and DDT yielded no mortality.
CONCLUSION: Highly resistance level against all WHO recommended imagicides were detected in field populations. We suggest more biochemical and molecular investigations to detect resistance mechanisms in the field population for further decision of vector control.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Culex pipiens; Susceptibility status; Tehran

Year:  2016        PMID: 28032100      PMCID: PMC5186738     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthropod Borne Dis        ISSN: 2322-1984            Impact factor:   1.198


Introduction

Mosquitoes known as the main groups of arthropods in medical and public health due to their role in transmission of Malaria, filariasis, several types of encephalitis and also many arboviral diseases (Horsfall 1955, Service 2003, Mullen 2009). In the Culicidae Family, Culex genus and specifically Cx. pipiens complex members including: Cx. pipiens pipiens, Cx. quinquefasciatus, Cx. p. pallens, Cx. pipiens form molestus act as efficient vectors for Sindbis virus, West Nile virus, Equine encephalitis, St Louis, Oropouche, Rift Valley fever, moreover Cx. pipiens transmit Plasmodium relictum that causing bird malaria. Its distribution is wide so that this species approximately present in all continent of the world (Mitchell et al. 1980, Vinogradova 2000, Smith and Fonseca 2004, Savage et al. 2007, Mullen 2009, Strickman and Fonseca 2012). In Iran during recent years transmitting of Dirofilaria immitis (dog heart worm), West Nile and Sindbis viruses by Culex mosquitoes have been reported (Naficy and Saidi 1970, Azari-Hamidian et al. 2007, Azari-Hamidian et al. 2009). Culex Genus habituated capital city of Tehran in sewage system of the houses, where there are different insecticides which have been used for controlling of household and agricultural pests such as: permehrin, bioallethrin, dursban, pirimiphos-methyl, malathion, chlorpyrifos-methyl, allethrin, propoxur. I addition different reagents also exist in the sweage systems. we postulated that resistance to insecticides is as a result of continous exposure to Different group of insecticides which may indirectly cause selection pressure on the susceptibility of mosquitoes mainly breed in wastewater habitats (Horsfall 1955, Lotfi 1976, Golestani 1976, Lines 1988, Vatandoost et al. 2004, Calhoun et al. 2007). Here upon the evaluation of susceptibility level of mosquitos for monitoring of resistance to insecticides is necessary and for this approach in Iran in recent years the most studies about evaluating susceptibility level of mosquitos to common insecticides have been on Anopheles mosquitos (Enayati et al. 2003, Vatandoost and Borhani 2004, Vatandoost and Hanafi-Bojd 2005, Vatandoost et al. 2005, Hanafi-Bojd et al. 2006, Shahi et al. 2006, Abai et al. 2008, Hanafi-Bojd et al. 2010, Oshaghi et al. 2011, Hanafi-Bojd et al. 2012, Soltani et al. 2013) and there are just a limited study about susceptibility status of Culex genus in Iran for example in the performed studies in Caspian sea coast about susceptibility level of Cx. pipiens complex results indicated that this species is resistant to DDT and susceptible to Dieldrin (Lotfi et al. 1975). Nazari and Janbakhsh in 2000 reported that Cx. pipiens in the southern area of Tehran is resistance to DDT (Nazari and Janbakhsh 2000). In 2004 the susceptibility level of laboratory and field collected strains of Cx. Quinquefasciatusin a medically important member belong to Cx. pipiens complex to different insecticides evaluated, DDT resistant was observed in both laboratory and field collected strains (Vatandoost et al. 2004). According to the most performed study around the world it seems that this species approximately is resistant to many insecticides or have multiple insecticide resistances (Davidson 1964, Mukhopadhyay et al. 1993, Ben Cheikh et al. 1998, Bisset et al. 1999, Martinez-Torres et al. 1999, Corbel et al. 2007, Tantely et al. 2010, Toma et al. 2011, Jones et al. 2012, Pocquet et al. 2013). The present study was preformed for evaluating susceptibility status of Cx. pipiens of Tehran City. The result of this study can be useful for future chemical control programs in the study area.

Materials and Methods

Study area

This study was conducted in Tehran city (35° 41′ 46″ N, 51° 25′ 23″ E), Tehran Province, Iran. Tehran is the capital of Iran and also is Iran's largest city (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.

The map of Iran and location of Tehran city

The map of Iran and location of Tehran city

Mosquito strains and adult susceptibility test

In this study four Insecticides including: DDT 4%, Lambdacyhalothrin 0.05%, Deltamethrin 0.05%, Cyfluthrin 0.15% were used for evaluating susceptibility status of Cx. pipiens. Moreover For comparison susceptibility status a Laboratory strain also was used. All tested species were reared in the insectary of School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences under the standard condition.

Data analysis

Bioassay data were analyzed with Probit program (Finney 1971). For correction mortality, when control mortality is greater than 5% but less than 20%, then the observed mortality was corrected using Abbott's formula (Abbott 1965). By method of Finney the lethal Time for 50% and 90% mortality (LT50 and LT90) values and their 95% confidence interval and Probit regression line parameters were determined for both strains (Lab and field population). The regression line belong to each Insecticides after different exposure times were plotted using Microsoft Excel (ver. 2013).

Results

The result of susceptibility test for lab and filed strains of Cx. pipiens has been summarized in Table 1 and 2. Lab strain exhibited different LT50 valuses to different insecticides. Cyfluthrin with LT50= 36Sec, Lambdacyhalothrin (LT50=79), Deltamethrin (LT50 = 326) and DDT (LT50=3005) had the lowest to highest lethal time (Table 1 and 3). Although this result for field population indicated that DDT exhibited no mortality. Cyfluthrin with LT50=27minutes, Lambdacyhalothrin (LT50= 111 minutes) and Deltamethrin (LT50= 182 minutes) had lowest to highest LT50 (Table 2 and 3). The result also showed that among these insecticides, Lab strain is susceptible to Lambdacyhalothrin, deltamethrin, cyfluthrin and resistance to DDT according to WHO criteria that suggested (98–100% mortality indicates susceptibility, 90–97% mortality indicates resistance candidate (more investigation is needed or requires confirmation of resistance with other methods) and <90% mortality suggests resistance) (WHO 2013). And also cyfluthrin with LT50=45Sec and DDT with LT50=3005 were the most and least effect (Table 1,3 and Fig. 2,3).
Table 1.

Probit regression line parameters of lab strain of Culex pipiens exposed to different insecticides

InsecticidesAB ± SELT50, 95% C.I. (Second)LT90, 95% C.I. (Second)X2 (df)P value
DDT 4%−9.212.64± 0.31264770613.56(3)>0.05
30059156
345513701
Lambdacyhalothrin 0.05%−2.501.31±0.18435102.41(2)>0.05
79752
1201302
Deltamethrin 0.05%−4.171.6± 0.1625514435.85 (4)>0.05
3261937
4062872
Cyfluthrin 0.15%−1.841.17±0.18143083.60(4)>0.05
36448
64725

A= y-intercept, B= the slope of the line, SE= Standard error, CI= confidence interval, x2= heterogeneity about the regression line, df= degree of freedom, P> 0.05 = represent no heterogeneity in the population of tested mosquitos.

Table 2.

Probit regression line parameters of field population of Culex pipiens exposed to different insecticides

InsecticidesAB ± SELT50, 95% C.I. (Minute)LT50, 95% C.I. (Minute)X2 (df)P value
Lambdacyhalothrin 0.05%−7.583.71±0.36992145.34(2)>0.05
111245
122293
Deltamethrin 0.05%−4.361.9± 0.351525110.37 (2)>0.05
182838
2342322
Cyfluthrin 0.15%−2.291.59±0.23211173.47(2)>0.05
27172
33336
DDT 4%[*]------

No mortality after 24 hours exposure

Table 3.

Mortality rate and susceptibility status of Culex pipiens (Lab and field population) exposed to different insecticides at one hour exposure and 24 hours recovery period

InsecticidesMR±EB*Resistance status**


Lab strainField populationLab strainField population
Lambdacyhalothrin 0.05%10020±2SR
Deltamethrin 0.05%98±118±3SR
Cyfluthrin 0.15%10066±3SR
DDT 4%55±30RR

Mortality Rate±Error Bar

R Resistance, S Susceptible

Fig. 2.

Regression lines for lab strain of Culex pipiens exposed to different insecticides

Fig. 3.

Regression lines for field population of Culex pipiens exposed to different insecticides

Probit regression line parameters of lab strain of Culex pipiens exposed to different insecticides A= y-intercept, B= the slope of the line, SE= Standard error, CI= confidence interval, x2= heterogeneity about the regression line, df= degree of freedom, P> 0.05 = represent no heterogeneity in the population of tested mosquitos. Probit regression line parameters of field population of Culex pipiens exposed to different insecticides No mortality after 24 hours exposure Mortality rate and susceptibility status of Culex pipiens (Lab and field population) exposed to different insecticides at one hour exposure and 24 hours recovery period Mortality Rate±Error Bar R Resistance, S Susceptible Regression lines for lab strain of Culex pipiens exposed to different insecticides Regression lines for field population of Culex pipiens exposed to different insecticides

Discussion

In the present study four Insecticides including: DDT 4%, Lambdacyhalothrin 0.05%, Deltamethrin 0.05% and Cyfluthrin 0.15% were used for evaluatin the susceptibility status of Cx.pipiens According to WHO criteria lab starin was resistant to DDT and Filed strain exhibited resistant to all insecticides used. In the both strains a highly level of resistance to DDT were determined and also the LT50 for DDT >Deltamethrin > Lambdacyhalothrin >Cyfluthrin respectively. In the two previous studies conducted in Tehran, resistant to DDT have been reported in Cx. pipiens and Cx. quinquefasciatusin and these results was in parallel to our finding (Nazari and Janbakhsh 2000, Vatandoost et al. 2004). It seems that Cx. pipiens in the most part of the world has been resistant to DDT (Mukhopadhyay et al. 1993, Nazni et al. 2005, Corbel et al. 2007, Sarkar et al. 2009, Jones et al. 2012, Pocquet et al. 2013). In the study conducted by Nazni et al. (2005) mosquitoes from two field sites in Kuala Lumpur exhibited resistance to DDT with no mortality 24h after exposure, and this result was same to our result about field population (Nazni et al. 2005). In another study, high frequencies of resistance to DDT in Cx. quinquefasciatus from Benin have been reported and mortality rate ranged from 5 to 54% (Corbel et al. 2007). In northeastern India Cx. quinquefasciatus which caught from 7 different field sites of study area this species was resistance to DDT in all sites and its mortality rate varied from 11.9 to 50.0% (Sarkar et al. 2009). Result of susceptibility test in northwest and southeastern part of Iran indicated that this species is highly resistant to DDT (Ataie et al. 2015, Fathian et al. 2015). In the current study, Field population also was resistance to Lambdacyhalothrin, Deltamethrin and Cyfluthrin and in some same studies this result also reported, for example resistance to Lambdacyhalothrin and Cyfluthrin reported in the Southeastern part of Iran and resistance to Lambdacyhalothrin in Northwestern part of Iran (Ataie et al. 2015, Fathian et al. 2015). In Cx. quinquefasciatus from Wete on Pemba Island in Zanzibar resistance to Deltamethrin and Lambdacyhalothrin also have been reported (Jones et al. 2012). In Thailand, Cx. quinquefasciatus belong to The Baan Suan strain was highly resistant to Deltamethrin even its mortality was very lower than our results (Sathantriphop et al. 2006). Resistance to Deltamethrin also reported by Chen et al. (2010), so that all the six surveyed Cx. pipiens pallens populations strains were resistance to Deltamethrin and also their mortality Ranged from 20.2% to 78.6% (Chen et al. 2010). In some studies resistance to the others group of insecticides like organophosphates and Carbamate also have been reported (Bisset et al. 1999, Corbel et al. 2007, Tantely et al. 2010, Toma et al. 2011, Ataie et al. 2015 Fathian et al. 2015). for example in the both study that performed in Northwestern and Southern part of Iran, Cx. pipiens showed resistance to Propoxur (Ataie et al. 2015, Fathian et al. 2015). Tolerance to Deltamethrin (with mortality=86%) in Culex populations from Kilimani, Unguja Island in Zanzibar also reported by Jones et al. (2012). Although this populations was susceptible to Lambdacyhalothrin. Moreover in this study Culex from the nearby site of Tibirinzi in Pemba was relatively susceptible to Deltamethrin and also Lambdacyhalothrin (Jones et al. 2012). In the same previously study that performed by Vatandoost et al in 2004, field population of Cx. Quinquefasciatus which collected from Sewage System of Tehran after evaluating their susceptibly status to insecticides result showed that this species is susceptible to Cyfluthrin and also have tolerance to Lambdacyhalothrin and Deltamethrin. Routine use of pesticides in Household and agricultural pest control might have developed this Enhanced Tolerance to insecticide in the wastewater mosquito, Cx. Quinquefasciatus (Vatandoost et al. 2004).

Conclusion

In the present study, in the population whitch collected from field highly resistance to all insecticides exhibited it might be due to pollution of wastewater with chemical substances Findings of this research could provide a clue for logical operations of future chemical control program. Next step of this research will focus on the biochemical and molecular investigation.
  31 in total

1.  DDT-RESISTANCE AND DIELDRIN-RESISTANCE IN CULEX PIPIENS FATIGANS WIEDEMANN.

Authors:  G DAVIDSON
Journal:  Ann Trop Med Parasitol       Date:  1964-06

2.  Autogeny in Culex pipiens complex mosquitoes from the San Francisco Bay Area.

Authors:  Daniel Strickman; Dina M Fonseca
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 2.345

3.  Entomological and epidemiological attributes for malaria transmission and implementation of vector control in southern Iran.

Authors:  A A Hanafi-Bojd; H Vatandoost; M A Oshaghi; A A Haghdoost; M Shahi; M M Sedaghat; F Abedi; M Yeryan; A Pakari
Journal:  Acta Trop       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 3.112

4.  Susceptibility status of Culex quinquefasciatus in Patna to insecticides.

Authors:  A K Mukhopadhyay; S N Sinha; R L Yadav; M V Narasimham
Journal:  Indian J Public Health       Date:  1993 Apr-Jun

5.  [Characterization of resistance to organophosphate insecticides, carbamates, and pyrethroids in Culex quinquefasciatus from the State of Miranda, Venezuela].

Authors:  J A Bisset; M M Rodríguez; C Díaz; L Alain Soca
Journal:  Rev Cubana Med Trop       Date:  1999 May-Aug

6.  Insecticide resistance and detoxifying enzyme activity in the principal bancroftian filariasis vector, Culex quinquefasciatus, in northeastern India.

Authors:  M Sarkar; I K Bhattacharyya; A Borkotoki; D Goswami; B Rabha; I Baruah; R B Srivastava
Journal:  Med Vet Entomol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.739

7.  Molecular evidence for a kdr-like pyrethroid resistance mechanism in the malaria vector mosquito Anopheles stephensi.

Authors:  A A Enayati; H Vatandoost; H Ladonni; H Townson; J Hemingway
Journal:  Med Vet Entomol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.739

8.  Comparative performance of imagicides on Anopheles stephensi, main malaria vector in a malarious area, southern Iran.

Authors:  M R Abai; A Mehravaran; H Vatandoost; M A Oshaghi; E Javadian; M Mashayekhi; A Mosleminia; N Piyazak; H Edallat; F Mohtarami; H Jabbari; F Rafi
Journal:  J Vector Borne Dis       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.688

9.  Multiple insecticide resistances in the disease vector Culex p. quinquefasciatus from Western Indian Ocean.

Authors:  Nicolas Pocquet; Pascal Milesi; Patrick Makoundou; Sandra Unal; Betty Zumbo; Célestine Atyame; Frédéric Darriet; Jean-Sébastien Dehecq; Julien Thiria; Ambicadutt Bheecarry; Diana P Iyaloo; Mylène Weill; Fabrice Chandre; Pierrick Labbé
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Baseline Susceptibility of Different Geographical Strains of Anopheles stephensi (Diptera: Culicidae) to Temephos in Malarious Areas of Irana.

Authors:  Aboozar Soltani; Hassan Vatandoost; Mohammad Ali Oshaghi; Ahmad Ali Enayati; Ahmad Raeisi; Mohammad Reza Eshraghian; Mohammad Mehdi Soltan-Dallal; Ahmad Ali Hanafi-Bojd; Mohammad Reza Abai; Fatemeh Rafi
Journal:  J Arthropod Borne Dis       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 1.198

View more
  9 in total

1.  Baseline Susceptibility of Filarial Vector Culex quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae) to Five Insecticides with Different Modes of Action in Southeast of Iran.

Authors:  Yaser Salim-Abadi; Mohammad Asadpour; Iraj Sharifi; Alireza Sanei-Dehkordi; Mohammad Amin Gorouhi; Azim Paksa; Zohre Tayyebi; Abbas Aghaei-Afshar
Journal:  J Arthropod Borne Dis       Date:  2017-12-30       Impact factor: 1.198

2.  First Report of Biochemical Mechanisms of Insecticide Resistance in the Field Population of Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae) from Sari, Mazandaran, North of Iran.

Authors:  Seyed Hassan Nikookar; Mahmoud Fazeli-Dinan; Seyyed Payman Ziapour; Fatemeh Ghorbani; Yaser Salim-Abadi; Hassan Vatandoost; Ahmad Ali Hanafi-Bojd; Ahmad Ali Enayati
Journal:  J Arthropod Borne Dis       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 1.198

3.  Evaluation of Pyrethroid Susceptibility in Culex pipiens of Northern Izmir Province, Turkey.

Authors:  Onur Guntay; Mehmet Salih Yikilmaz; Huseyin Ozaydin; Savas Izzetoglu; Asli Suner
Journal:  J Arthropod Borne Dis       Date:  2018-12-25       Impact factor: 1.198

4.  Target Site Insensitivity Detection in Deltamethrin Resistant Culex pipiens Complex in Iran.

Authors:  Reza Zeidabadinezhad; Hassan Vatandoost; Mohammad Reza Abai; Navid Dinparast Djadid; Abbasali Raz; Mohammad Mahdi Sedaghat; Mohamad Ali Oshaghi; Ahmad Raeisi; Neda Adibi
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.429

5.  Baseline Susceptibility of Culiseta longiareolata (Diptera: Culicidae) to Different Imagicides, in Eastern Azerbaijan, Iran.

Authors:  Teimour Hazratian; Azim Paksa; Mohammad Mahdi Sedaghat; Hassan Vatandoost; Seyed Hassan Moosa-Kazemi; Alireza Sanei-Dehkordi; Yaser Salim-Abadi; Masoumeh Pirmohammadi; Saideh Yousefi; Masoumeh Amin; Mohammad Ali Oshaghi
Journal:  J Arthropod Borne Dis       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 1.198

6.  Investigation of Susceptibility Levels of Culex pipiens L. (Diptera: Culicidae) Populations to Synthetic Pyrethroids in Antalya Province of Turkey.

Authors:  Onder Ser; Huseyin Cetin
Journal:  J Arthropod Borne Dis       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 1.198

7.  Pathogenic fungi infection attributes of malarial vectors Anopheles maculipennis and Anopheles superpictus in central Iran.

Authors:  Seyed Hassan Moosa-Kazemi; Tahereh Sadat Asgarian; Mohammad Mehdi Sedaghat; Saeedeh Javar
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 2.979

Review 8.  Monitoring and Mapping of Insecticide Resistance in Medically Important Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in Iran (2000-2020): A Review.

Authors:  Yaser Salim Abadi; Alireza Sanei-Dehkordi; Azim Paksa; Mohammad Amin Gorouhi; Hassan Vatandoost
Journal:  J Arthropod Borne Dis       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 1.198

9.  High Resistance of Vector of West Nile Virus, Culex pipiens Linnaeus (Diptera: Culicidae) to Different Insecticides Recommended by WHO in Northern Iran.

Authors:  Fatemeh Ghorbani; Hassan Vatandoost; Ahmad Ali Hanafi-Bojd; Mohammad Reza Abai; Hassan Nikookar; Ahmad Ali Enayati
Journal:  J Arthropod Borne Dis       Date:  2018-03-18       Impact factor: 1.198

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.