Jongmin Lee1, Jae Ha Lee1, Jee-Ae Kim2, Chin Kook Rhee1. 1. Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul. 2. Pharmaceutical Policy Evaluation Research Team, Research Institution, Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, Wonju-si, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There are only a few longitudinal studies regarding medical utilization and costs for patients with COPD. The purpose of this study was to analyze the trend of medical utilization and costs on a long-term basis. METHODS: Using the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) data from 2008 to 2013, COPD patients were identified. The trend of medical utilization and costs was also analyzed. RESULTS: The number of COPD patients increased by 13.9% from 2008 to 2013. During the same period, the cost of COPD medication increased by 78.2%. Methylxanthine and systemic beta agonists were most widely prescribed between 2008 and 2013. However, inhaled medications such as long-acting beta-2 agonist (LABA), long-acting muscarinic agonist, and inhaled corticosteroid plus LABA were dispensed to a relatively low proportion of patients with COPD. The number of patients who were prescribed inhaled medications increased gradually from 2008 to 2013, while the number of patients prescribed systemic beta agonist and methylxanthine has decreased since 2010. CONCLUSION: This study shows that there is a large gap between the COPD guidelines and clinical practice in Korea. Training programs for primary care physicians on diagnosis and guideline-based treatment are needed to improve the management of COPD.
BACKGROUND: There are only a few longitudinal studies regarding medical utilization and costs for patients with COPD. The purpose of this study was to analyze the trend of medical utilization and costs on a long-term basis. METHODS: Using the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) data from 2008 to 2013, COPDpatients were identified. The trend of medical utilization and costs was also analyzed. RESULTS: The number of COPDpatients increased by 13.9% from 2008 to 2013. During the same period, the cost of COPD medication increased by 78.2%. Methylxanthine and systemic beta agonists were most widely prescribed between 2008 and 2013. However, inhaled medications such as long-acting beta-2 agonist (LABA), long-acting muscarinic agonist, and inhaled corticosteroid plus LABA were dispensed to a relatively low proportion of patients with COPD. The number of patients who were prescribed inhaled medications increased gradually from 2008 to 2013, while the number of patients prescribed systemic beta agonist and methylxanthine has decreased since 2010. CONCLUSION: This study shows that there is a large gap between the COPD guidelines and clinical practice in Korea. Training programs for primary care physicians on diagnosis and guideline-based treatment are needed to improve the management of COPD.
Entities:
Keywords:
chronic obstructive; drug prescriptions; medical cost; medical utilization; pulmonary disease
COPD is characterized by an airflow limitation with a forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity ratio of <70%, which is not fully reversible. The worldwide prevalence of COPD is increasing, and the Global Burden of Disease Study has estimated that it will be the fourth leading cause of death in 2030.1 With increasing prevalence, the economic burden of COPD is also increasing. In 2010, the estimated cost of COPD in the USA was $50 billion, which included $20 billion of indirect costs and $30 billion of direct health care expenditures.2 Although more studies have recently investigated the economic burden of COPD, existing data show remarkable variations due to differences in survey methods, diagnostic criteria, and analytic approaches.3 Though simple, inexpensive spirometers are now available for clinical practices, under-recognition and underdiagnosis of COPD affect the accuracy of data.4Although some studies have reported the cost and utilization of medication for COPD,5 not many have reviewed these factors for an entire country. Moreover, only few longitudinal studies have followed the cases on a long-term basis.Korea has a compulsory universal health insurance system that includes medical reimbursement records for the entire Korean population. The Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) database has detailed information about diagnosis, health care use, and medication, and is thus a reliable source for nationwide epidemiological evaluations.6 The objective of this article is to analyze the cost and utilization of COPD medication in Korea using the HIRA database.
Methods
Data sources
We used the HIRA data from 2008 to 2013 to analyze trends in cost and utilization of COPD medication. All hospitals, clinics, public health centers, and pharmacies are registered with the Korean National Health Insurance (NHI). The health care service providers first file a claim with the NHI, after which the HIRA assesses the claim based on diagnostic codes and medical records.
Patient selection
An operational definition was used for extracting COPDpatients from the HIRA database.7–10 We searched for subjects with diagnosis of COPD based on the International Classification of Disease – Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes and medications prescribed. COPDpatients were defined as subjects who met all of the following criteria: 1) age ≥40 years; 2) ICD-10 codes for COPD or emphysema (J43.0x–J44.x, with the exception of J43.0 as primary or secondary [within fourth position] diagnosis); and 3) the use of more than one of the following COPD medications at least twice per year: long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA), long-acting beta-2 agonist (LABA), inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) + LABA, short-acting muscarinic antagonist (SAMA), short-acting beta-2 agonist (SABA), SAMA + SABA, phos-phodiesterase-4 (PDE-4) inhibitor, systemic beta agonist, or methylxanthine.
Analysis
The cost and utilization of COPD medication were analyzed from 2008 to 2013. Only COPD-related medications (ICS, ICS + LABA, LABA, LAMA, leukotriene receptor antagonist [LTRA], oral corticosteroid [OCS], PDE-4 inhibitor, SABA, SAMA, SABA + SAMA, methylxanthine, and systemic beta agonist) were included in the analysis. All costs are presented in US dollars (one US dollar =1,144 Korean won, as of 12 April 2016). The Ethics Committee of Seoul St Mary’s Hospital approved the present study and waived the requirement for informed patient consent due to the retrospective nature of the study.
Results
Changes in overall medical use during the past 6 years
In Korea, the number of COPDpatients increased by 13.9% from 184,059 to 209,579 since 2008 until 2013. The average number of prescribed medications for COPD also increased from 10.1 to 12.0 (Table 1). The total cost of COPD-related medication increased by 78.2% ($20,787,780). The cost of COPD medication per person increased from $138.4 in 2008 to $216.6, a 56.5% increase over 6 years. Table 2 shows the cost of medication prescribed for COPD per patient and its change. Table 3 shows the changes in the pattern of medication prescriptions for COPD from 2008 to 2013.
Table 1
Number of COPD patients and prescriptions of each medication from 2008 to 2013
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Number of patients
184,059
180,334
211,148
217,624
224,889
209,579
Number of prescriptions per patient each yeara
71.2
71.6
70.6
69.7
74.1
73.8
Number of prescriptions for COPD per patient each yearb
10.1
10.0
11.6
11.5
11.9
12.0
Notes:
Average number of all medications prescribed to a patient with COPD per year.
Average number of COPD medications prescribed to a patient with COPD per year.
Table 2
Changes in the cost of prescribed medication for COPD per patient over the 6 years (all costs are in US dollars)
Indacaterol was approved for use in Korea in 2010. Before then, LABA was rarely prescribed. In 2008, LABA inhalers were dispensed to only 1.1% (2,084) of the COPDpatients. In 2013, 6.1% (12,843) of the Korean COPDpatients were prescribed LABA, an 83.8% increase over 6 years (Figure 1). Prescriptions for LAMA increased gradually as well. In 2008, LAMA inhalers were dispensed to 26.2% (48,296) of COPDpatients in Korea, and this increased to 37.3% (78,227) in 2013 (Figure 2). The cost of LAMA accounted for the largest proportion of the cost of COPD medication over 6 years. The total cost of LAMA increased from $9,738,800 in 2008 to $18,766,800 in 2013, a 92.3% increase over the 6 years (Table 3).
Figure 1
Change in the number of LABA prescriptions over the 6 years.
Abbreviation: LABA, long-acting beta-2 agonist.
Figure 2
Change in the number of LAMA prescriptions over the 6 years.
In 2008, ICS-only inhalers were dispensed to 11.3% (20,756) of patients, and this increased gradually, but decreased after 2012 (Figure 3). In parallel, the total cost of ICS-only inhalers increased from $692,500 in 2009 to $860,400 in 2012, but decreased to $774,300 in 2013.
Figure 3
Change in the number of ICS prescriptions over the 6 years.
Abbreviation: ICS, inhaled corticosteroid.
ICS plus LABA
In 2008, 27.4% (50,500) of patients with COPD were dispensed ICS + LABA, and this increased to 32.3% (72,727) in 2012, but decreased from 2012 to 2013 (Figure 4). The total cost of ICS + LABA gradually increased from 2008 to 2012, but decreased from $14,550,700 in 2012 to $14,027,000 in 2013 (Table 3).
Figure 4
Change in the number of ICS + LABA prescriptions over the 6 years.
Roflumilast is the only PDE-4 inhibitor approved in Korea. In 2013, it was approved for reimbursement in Korea as an add-on therapy for COPD. In 2013, 1.5% (3,309) of the patients with COPD were prescribed roflumilast at a total cost of $278,400 (Table 3 and Figure 5).
Figure 5
Change in the number of PDE-4 inhibitor prescriptions over the 6 years.
Abbreviation: PDE-4, phosphodiesterase-4.
LTRA
LTRA is a well-known medication for asthma. Although LTRA is not recommended for patients with COPD in guideline, it is widely used for patients with asthma–COPD overlap syndrome.10,11 In 2013, 26.7% (60,116) of patients with COPD were dispensed LTRA, an increase from 1.2% (2,278) in 2008 (Figure 6).
Figure 6
Change in the number of LTRA prescriptions over the 6 years.
Among the people who were given any medications indicated for the treatment of COPD in 2013, 28.6% had been dispensed OCS, an increase from 22.5% in 2008 (Figure 7). As shown in Table 3, the total cost of OCS increased gradually from $75,700 in 2008 to $229,680 in 2011, but decreased after 2011 to $176,600.
Figure 7
Change in the number of OCS prescriptions over the 6 years.
Abbreviation: OCS, oral corticosteroid.
Short-acting bronchodilators
In 2008, 32.9% of the Korean COPDpatients were prescribed SABA, and the proportion of COPDpatients using SABA has remained steady since 2008 (Figure 8). The total cost of SABA increased gradually from $712,500 in 2008 to $871,700 in 2011, but has decreased slightly since 2012 (Table 3). In 2012, 12.6% of patients with COPD were prescribed an SAMA, a gradual decrease from 17.2% in 2008 (Figure 9). The total cost of SAMA also decreased from $609,900 in 2008 to $399,300 in 2013. In 2008, combined SABA + SAMA was prescribed to 27% of the patients with COPD in Korea; however, the number of SABA + SAMA prescriptions decreased markedly from 2011 to 2013 as the manufacture of SABA + SAMA was discontinued in Korea since 2011 (Figure 10).
Figure 8
Change in the number of SABA prescriptions over the 6 years.
Abbreviation: SABA, short-acting beta-2 agonist.
Figure 9
Change in the number of SAMA prescriptions over the 6 years.
Methylxanthine has been the most widely prescribed medication for the management of COPD in Korea between 2008 and 2013. A total of 52.9% of patients with COPD were prescribed methylxanthine in 2008, and the proportion increased to 74.2% in 2010. In 2013, methylxanthine was dispensed to 63.4% of patients with COPD in Korea (Figure 11). The total cost of methylxanthine increased from $2,235,900 in 2008 to $4,089,000 in 2011 and then decreased to $2,674,400 in 2013 (Table 3).
Figure 11
Change in the number of methylxanthine prescriptions over the 6 years.
Systemic beta agonist
Although systemic beta agonist is not recommended for the treatment of COPD, it was prescribed to 51.5% of patients with COPD in 2008. As shown in Figure 12, the proportion of patients who were prescribed systemic beta agonist decreased to 31.8% in 2013. The total cost of systemic beta agonist also decreased from $1,800,900 in 2008 to $1,379,800 in 2013 (Table 3).
Figure 12
Change in the number of systemic beta agonist prescriptions over the 6 years.
Discussion
In this nationwide study, we used Korean HIRA data to analyze cost and utilization of COPD medication in Korea. The number of COPDpatients increased by 22.2% from 2008 to 2012. This increase is partly related to an increase in the elderly population in Korea.12 Improved physician understanding of COPD may have contributed to the increase in the number of COPDpatients until 2012. During the study period, the cost of COPD medication increased by 78.2%, mainly due to increase in prescription rates for LAMA and ICS + LABA, which are more expensive than other COPD medications.This study found that oral medications such as methylxanthine and systemic beta agonist were widely prescribed, while inhaled medications such as LABA, LAMA, and ICS + LABA were dispensed to a relatively low proportion of patients with COPD. Although the use of methylxanthine is recommended when the symptom of breathlessness remains despite the use of inhaled bronchodilators,13 it is not a major medication in the treatment of COPD. However, methylxanthine was the most commonly prescribed COPD medication over 6 years in Korea. This reflects the poor compliance to current treatment guidelines for COPD in real clinical practice. There are several possible explanations for this discrepancy between the COPD guideline and real practice. One study reported that primary care physicians (PCPs) in Korea preferred oral to inhaled medication for both stable COPD and acutely exacerbated COPD.14 It is mainly because the reimbursement criteria for inhaler medication for COPD are based on the spirometry results. Therefore, without spirometry results, it is difficult to prescribe inhalers to COPDpatients in Korea. Although a diagnosis of COPD by spirometry is essential for prescribing inhaled medication in Korea, the use of spirometry by PCPs was low.14 It is also possible that PCPs felt constrained by the amount of time it would take to teach correct use of inhaled medications in a primary care setting, although education is necessary to ensure the effectiveness of inhaled medications.Nevertheless, the results show that there has been a steady improvement in this discrepancy. The number of patients who were prescribed inhalers increased between 2008 and 2013, while the number of patients prescribed systemic beta agonist and methylxanthine has decreased since 2010.There are some limitations to this study. First, no pulmonary function test results were available. Therefore, the enrolled patients did not have proven diagnoses of COPD, and the severity of COPD could not be assessed based on spirometry. Second, since the data analyzed were based on the pharmacy records of dispensed prescriptions, adherence to the prescribed medication was not measured in this study. Non-adherence to COPD therapy is widespread and a significant risk factor for morbidity and mortality.15 Underuse of medications is common, with reports that up to 49.4% of COPDpatients are not taking their medications as prescribed.16–18 A further study with more focus on adherence is therefore recommended. Third, data on smoking history and environmental or occupational exposure were not available, so the cause of the COPD is unknown in the patients enrolled in this study.
Conclusion
Analysis of the Korean NHI database shows that there is a large gap between the COPD guidelines and clinical practice in Korea. The problems we have highlighted include evidence of substantial over- and underuse of certain classes of medications when compared with the COPD guidelines for the appropriate use of these medications. These findings are important in terms of both the missed opportunities for improved disease control and the additional cost burden and risk of adverse effects imposed by the incorrect use of medications. Although there might be various reasons for the deviation between the guidelines and the clinical practice, they could not be analyzed in this study due to the limitation of nature of claim data. Further investigation into the factors that could affect this discrepancy will be needed.
Authors: Chin Kook Rhee; Hyoung Kyu Yoon; Kwang Ha Yoo; Young Sam Kim; Sei Won Lee; Yong Bum Park; Jin Hwa Lee; Yuri Kim; Kyungjoo Kim; Jinhee Kim; Yeon Mok Oh; Sang Do Lee Journal: COPD Date: 2013-10-10 Impact factor: 2.409
Authors: Jørgen Vestbo; Suzanne S Hurd; Alvar G Agustí; Paul W Jones; Claus Vogelmeier; Antonio Anzueto; Peter J Barnes; Leonardo M Fabbri; Fernando J Martinez; Masaharu Nishimura; Robert A Stockley; Don D Sin; Roberto Rodriguez-Roisin Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2012-08-09 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Jinhee Kim; Jin Hwa Lee; Yuri Kim; Kyungjoo Kim; Yeon-Mok Oh; Kwang Ha Yoo; Chin Kook Rhee; Hyoung Kyu Yoon; Young Sam Kim; Yong Bum Park; Sei Won Lee; Sang Do Lee Journal: BMC Pulm Med Date: 2013-08-09 Impact factor: 3.317
Authors: Hamid Tavakoli; Kate M Johnson; J Mark FitzGerald; Don D Sin; Andrea S Gershon; Tetyana Kendzerska; Mohsen Sadatsafavi Journal: Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Date: 2019-09-03