Literature DB >> 28031528

Directly converted iNeuron as a screening model for pathogenic variants.

Su Min Lim1,2, Chang-Seok Ki3, Seung Hyun Kim2,4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  patient-specific cell model; direct conversion; induced neuron; neurodegenerative disease

Year:  2017        PMID: 28031528      PMCID: PMC5354789          DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.14111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncotarget        ISSN: 1949-2553


× No keyword cloud information.
Recent advances in genetic technologies have undoubtedly contributed to identify a flood of rare variants including novel or pathogenic variants. However, one remarkable finding of the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) is that many likely benign variants have been misclassified as harmful [1]. Therefore, reliable cell modeling systems are crucible to hunt for evidence that newly identified variant has a functional role in disease before declaring that it is pathogenic. Moreover, these models should at least recapitulate human pathological findings. Cell death mechanisms of diverse neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) have been poorly understood due to the lack of clinically relevant models that recapitulate the specific molecular pathogenesis of a disease. Limited information obtainable from postmortem neural tissue and animal model fails to establish faithful analogs to understand ongoing cell death mechanism of neurodegenerative disease. Hence, modeling pathophysiological cascades with human adult somatic cells carrying pathogenic variants provides fascinating prospects. Adult somatic cells with neurodegenerative disease including patient skin fibroblasts or reprogramming of fibroblasts to induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC), which are capable of differentiating to neurons have been developed as models to provide better understanding of the disease pathology [2, 3]. However, pathological neuronal features are not present in patient fibroblasts whereas the generation of iPSC-derived neurons requires intricate procedures and has low reprogramming efficiency [4]. Moreover, developmental, environmental, and age-related alterations in epigenetic events are lost upon establishing iPSCs, which are limitations associated with the use of iPSC-derived neurons [5]. The recent promising approach to transdifferentiate terminally differentiated cells into another cell fate does not require complex culture procedures: Direct conversion of fibroblast into induced neuron (iNeuron). Compared to iPSC, iNeuron is simple, rapid, and within higher reprogramming efficiency, which fast-tracks the reprogramming process (Figure 1). The down-regulation of a single RNA binding polypyrimidine-tract-binding protein 1 (PTBP1) in fibroblast to establish iNeuron and sort out the untransduced cells with puromycin has allowed highly efficient cell modeling for neurodegenerative diseases [6-8]. Moreover, assuming that the patient fibroblast and its directly converted iNeurons have the same developmental age, the epigenetic alterations might be retained in iNeurons, which is why iNeuron is an efficient model to study the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative disease.
Figure 1

Direct conversion from human skin fibroblasts to iNeurons to fast-track the reprogramming process

In our recent study on ALS, we cultured skin fibroblasts from ALS patients carrying pathogenic variants in the fused in sarcoma (FUS) gene, reprogrammed, and grew into mature neurons [7]. In our experiment, iNeuron models from patients with mutant FUS at the C-terminal nuclear localization signal (NLS) region of the protein had aberrant cytosolic mislocalization with nuclear clearance. Such pathological features of mutant FUS, which recapitulate the pathological phenotype of the autopsied ALS patient, were specific for patient-derived iNeurons as they do not occur in the patient’s fibroblasts. Our study therefore revealed that iNeurons may provide a reliable model to estimate each patient-specific pathology in ALS-FUS. We used iNeuron models to illuminate the disease pathology in another devastative neurodegenerative disease. In this study, we not only compared iNeurons from Krabbe disease (KD) patients to disease-free healthy control iNeurons, but also added a potent disease-causing factor psychosine to the control iNeurons to establish the causal role of its accumulation in KD [8]. KD is an autosomal recessive neurodegenerative disorder caused by lysosomal enzyme ß-galactosylceramidase (GALC) deficiency. We reported that adult-onset KD iNeurons showed diminished GALC activity and increased levels of psychosine, the toxic substrate that accumulates in KD. Neurite fragmentation along with abnormal lysosomal or mitochondrial function was observed, suggesting autonomous neuronal toxicity in KD pathology. Increase of psychosine levels in healthy iNeurons was sufficient to induce pathology found in the patient iNeurons. This provides compelling evidence for the causal role of neurotoxic psychosine accumulation in KD and highlights autonomous neuronal dysfunction in adult-onset KD. Therefore, use of reliable screening system for sorting out which variants currently considered pathogenic to be actually benign is absolutely important, and vice versa as well. For example, patient-specific iNeuron model provide FUS (p.Q519E) variant considered as benign in non-neuronal cell models to be turned out as pathogenic depending on the pathological features exhibited in more disease-relevant models. Therefore, the variants that were considered benign in less disease-related cell models should be revisited to estimate their pathogenicity in more disease-relevant models. In order to fully elucidate which variants are actually causative for disease will be a challenging task. Before declaring that a variant is pathogenic or non-pathogenic, researchers should hunt for evidence that the variant does or does not provide mechanistic insights into the functional link between the genetic variant and the disease. More rigorous evaluation using multiple approaches to establish the most adequate model to find the genetic causes of disease is therefore needed. Using patient-specific iNeurons, future studies should focus on mediating gene editing in patient iNeurons to correct underlying pathogenic variants and ameliorate disease features or increase cellular survival. This must be done not only to reveal the disease causality but also to help develop precise and personalized medicine for the treatment of a specific genetic defect. Diseases should be dissected at a small scale as well as a large scale to address biological questions in neurodegenerative diseases. High-throughput single neuron analysis and time-series single cell measurements can compare neuron-neuron transcriptional variability to understand cellular heterogeneity in neurological disease. Multicellular culture systems such as the coculture of the supernatant derived from healthy neurons with disease-derived glial cells or multicellular organoids of healthy glial cells with disease-derived neurons will be an efficient path to address long-standing questions regarding multicellular pathogenesis in neurodegenerative diseases. Collectively, iNeurons may be a reliable model for investigating and understanding the genetic causes of neurodegenerative diseases.
  8 in total

1.  Parkinson's disease patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells free of viral reprogramming factors.

Authors:  Frank Soldner; Dirk Hockemeyer; Caroline Beard; Qing Gao; George W Bell; Elizabeth G Cook; Gunnar Hargus; Alexandra Blak; Oliver Cooper; Maisam Mitalipova; Ole Isacson; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Secondary coenzyme Q10 deficiency triggers mitochondria degradation by mitophagy in MELAS fibroblasts.

Authors:  David Cotán; Mario D Cordero; Juan Garrido-Maraver; Manuel Oropesa-Ávila; Angeles Rodríguez-Hernández; Lourdes Gómez Izquierdo; Mario De la Mata; Manuel De Miguel; Juan Bautista Lorite; Eloy Rivas Infante; Sandra Jackson; Plácido Navas; José A Sánchez-Alcázar
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Direct conversion of fibroblasts to neurons by reprogramming PTB-regulated microRNA circuits.

Authors:  Yuanchao Xue; Kunfu Ouyang; Jie Huang; Yu Zhou; Hong Ouyang; Hairi Li; Gang Wang; Qijia Wu; Chaoliang Wei; Yanzhen Bi; Li Jiang; Zhiqiang Cai; Hui Sun; Kang Zhang; Yi Zhang; Ju Chen; Xiang-Dong Fu
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Human iPSC-derived motoneurons harbouring TARDBP or C9ORF72 ALS mutations are dysfunctional despite maintaining viability.

Authors:  Anna-Claire Devlin; Karen Burr; Shyamanga Borooah; Joshua D Foster; Elaine M Cleary; Imbisaat Geti; Ludovic Vallier; Christopher E Shaw; Siddharthan Chandran; Gareth B Miles
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Patient fibroblasts-derived induced neurons demonstrate autonomous neuronal defects in adult-onset Krabbe disease.

Authors:  Su Min Lim; Byung-Ok Choi; Seong-Il Oh; Won Jun Choi; Ki-Wook Oh; Minyeop Nahm; Yuanchao Xue; Jae Hyeok Choi; Ji Young Choi; Young-Eun Kim; Ki Wha Chung; Xiang-Dong Fu; Chang-Seok Ki; Seung Hyun Kim
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-11-15

6.  Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans.

Authors:  Monkol Lek; Konrad J Karczewski; Eric V Minikel; Kaitlin E Samocha; Eric Banks; Timothy Fennell; Anne H O'Donnell-Luria; James S Ware; Andrew J Hill; Beryl B Cummings; Taru Tukiainen; Daniel P Birnbaum; Jack A Kosmicki; Laramie E Duncan; Karol Estrada; Fengmei Zhao; James Zou; Emma Pierce-Hoffman; Joanne Berghout; David N Cooper; Nicole Deflaux; Mark DePristo; Ron Do; Jason Flannick; Menachem Fromer; Laura Gauthier; Jackie Goldstein; Namrata Gupta; Daniel Howrigan; Adam Kiezun; Mitja I Kurki; Ami Levy Moonshine; Pradeep Natarajan; Lorena Orozco; Gina M Peloso; Ryan Poplin; Manuel A Rivas; Valentin Ruano-Rubio; Samuel A Rose; Douglas M Ruderfer; Khalid Shakir; Peter D Stenson; Christine Stevens; Brett P Thomas; Grace Tiao; Maria T Tusie-Luna; Ben Weisburd; Hong-Hee Won; Dongmei Yu; David M Altshuler; Diego Ardissino; Michael Boehnke; John Danesh; Stacey Donnelly; Roberto Elosua; Jose C Florez; Stacey B Gabriel; Gad Getz; Stephen J Glatt; Christina M Hultman; Sekar Kathiresan; Markku Laakso; Steven McCarroll; Mark I McCarthy; Dermot McGovern; Ruth McPherson; Benjamin M Neale; Aarno Palotie; Shaun M Purcell; Danish Saleheen; Jeremiah M Scharf; Pamela Sklar; Patrick F Sullivan; Jaakko Tuomilehto; Ming T Tsuang; Hugh C Watkins; James G Wilson; Mark J Daly; Daniel G MacArthur
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Genetic Variability Overrides the Impact of Parental Cell Type and Determines iPSC Differentiation Potential.

Authors:  Aija Kyttälä; Roksana Moraghebi; Cristina Valensisi; Johannes Kettunen; Colin Andrus; Kalyan Kumar Pasumarthy; Mahito Nakanishi; Ken Nishimura; Manami Ohtaka; Jere Weltner; Ben Van Handel; Olavi Parkkonen; Juha Sinisalo; Anu Jalanko; R David Hawkins; Niels-Bjarne Woods; Timo Otonkoski; Ras Trokovic
Journal:  Stem Cell Reports       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 7.765

8.  Directly converted patient-specific induced neurons mirror the neuropathology of FUS with disrupted nuclear localization in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  Su Min Lim; Won Jun Choi; Ki-Wook Oh; Yuanchao Xue; Ji Young Choi; Sung Hoon Kim; Minyeop Nahm; Young-Eun Kim; Jinhyuk Lee; Min-Young Noh; Seungbok Lee; Sejin Hwang; Chang-Seok Ki; Xiang-Dong Fu; Seung Hyun Kim
Journal:  Mol Neurodegener       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 14.195

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.