Literature DB >> 28031398

Principles of auditory processing differ between sensory and premotor structures of the songbird forebrain.

Efe Soyman1, David S Vicario2.   

Abstract

Sensory and motor brain structures work in collaboration during perception. To evaluate their respective contributions, the present study recorded neural responses to auditory stimulation at multiple sites simultaneously in both the higher-order auditory area NCM and the premotor area HVC of the songbird brain in awake zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). Bird's own song (BOS) and various conspecific songs (CON) were presented in both blocked and shuffled sequences. Neural responses showed plasticity in the form of stimulus-specific adaptation, with markedly different dynamics between the two structures. In NCM, the response decrease with repetition of each stimulus was gradual and long-lasting and did not differ between the stimuli or the stimulus presentation sequences. In contrast, HVC responses to CON stimuli decreased much more rapidly in the blocked than in the shuffled sequence. Furthermore, this decrease was more transient in HVC than in NCM, as shown by differential dynamics in the shuffled sequence. Responses to BOS in HVC decreased more gradually than to CON stimuli. The quality of neural representations, computed as the mutual information between stimuli and neural activity, was higher in NCM than in HVC. Conversely, internal functional correlations, estimated as the coherence between recording sites, were greater in HVC than in NCM. The cross-coherence between the two structures was weak and limited to low frequencies. These findings suggest that auditory communication signals are processed according to very different but complementary principles in NCM and HVC, a contrast that may inform study of the auditory and motor pathways for human speech processing.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Neural responses to auditory stimulation in sensory area NCM and premotor area HVC of the songbird forebrain show plasticity in the form of stimulus-specific adaptation with markedly different dynamics. These two structures also differ in stimulus representations and internal functional correlations. Accordingly, NCM seems to process the individually specific complex vocalizations of others based on prior familiarity, while HVC responses appear to be modulated by transitions and/or timing in the ongoing sequence of sounds.
Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  electrophysiology, songbird; mutual information; sensory-motor structures; stimulus-specific adaptation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28031398      PMCID: PMC5349330          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00462.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  43 in total

1.  Dynamic control of auditory activity during sleep: correlation between song response and EEG.

Authors:  T A Nick; M Konishi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-11-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  State and neuronal class-dependent reconfiguration in the avian song system.

Authors:  Peter L Rauske; Stephen D Shea; Daniel Margoliash
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language.

Authors:  Gregory Hickok; David Poeppel
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2004 May-Jun

Review 4.  Cognitive control and parsing: reexamining the role of Broca's area in sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Jared M Novick; John C Trueswell; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Functional connectivity between auditory areas field L and CLM and song system nucleus HVC in anesthetized zebra finches.

Authors:  Sarita S Shaevitz; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Mammalian-like features of sleep structure in zebra finches.

Authors:  Philip Steven Low; Sylvan S Shank; Terrence J Sejnowski; Daniel Margoliash
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  HVC lesions modify immediate early gene expression in auditory forebrain regions of female songbirds.

Authors:  Kathleen S Lynch; Hayley K Kleitz-Nelson; Gregory F Ball
Journal:  Dev Neurobiol       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 3.964

8.  Gamma oscillations in the entorhinal cortex of the freely behaving rat.

Authors:  J J Chrobak; G Buzsáki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Left-side dominance for song discrimination in Bengalese finches (Lonchura striata var. domestica).

Authors:  K Okanoya; M Ikebuchi; H Uno; S Watanabe
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2001-10-19       Impact factor: 3.084

10.  Global synchronous response to autogenous song in zebra finch HVc.

Authors:  M L Sutter; D Margoliash
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Neuroestrogens rapidly shape auditory circuits to support communication learning and perception: Evidence from songbirds.

Authors:  Daniel M Vahaba; Luke Remage-Healey
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 3.587

2.  Norepinephrine enhances song responsiveness and encoding in the auditory forebrain of male zebra finches.

Authors:  Vanessa Lee; Benjamin A Pawlisch; Matheus Macedo-Lima; Luke Remage-Healey
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  HDAC3 Inhibitor RGFP966 Modulates Neuronal Memory for Vocal Communication Signals in a Songbird Model.

Authors:  Mimi L Phan; Mark M Gergues; Shafali Mahidadia; Jorge Jimenez-Castillo; David S Vicario; Kasia M Bieszczad
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-05

4.  Rapid and long-lasting improvements in neural discrimination of acoustic signals with passive familiarization.

Authors:  Efe Soyman; David S Vicario
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Neuroestrogen synthesis modifies neural representations of learned song without altering vocal imitation in developing songbirds.

Authors:  Daniel M Vahaba; Amelia Hecsh; Luke Remage-Healey
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Unilateral vocal nerve resection alters neurogenesis in the avian song system in a region-specific manner.

Authors:  Jake V Aronowitz; Alice Perez; Christopher O'Brien; Siaresh Aziz; Erica Rodriguez; Kobi Wasner; Sissi Ribeiro; Dovounnae Green; Farhana Faruk; Carolyn L Pytte
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.